Social status and individual behavioral differences in juvenile Macrobrachium rosenbergii

References

• Álvarez D, Bell AM. 2007. Sticklebacks from streams are more bold than sticklebacks from ponds. Behav Process. 76:215–217.10.1016/j.beproc.2007.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang A, Deshpande S, Sumana A, Gadagkar R. 2010. Choosing an appropriate index to construct dominance hierarchies in animal societies: a comparison of three indices. Anim Behav. 79:631–636.10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barki A, Karplus I, Goren M. 1991. The agonistic behavior of the three male morphotypes of the freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii (Crustacea, Palaemonidae). Behaviour. 116:253–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barki A, Karplus I, Goren M. 1992. Effects of size and morphotype on dominance hierarchies and resource competition in the freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Anim Behav. 44:547–555.10.1016/0003-3472(92)90064-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr S, Laming PR, Dick JTA, Elwood RW. 2008. Nociception or pain in a decapod crustacean? Anim Behav. 75:745–751.10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer RT. 1989. Decapod crustacean grooming: functional morphology, adaptive value, and phylogenetic significance; [cited 2013 May 14]. Available from: http://decapoda.nhm.org/pdfs/31534/31534.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer RT. 2002. The ineffectiveness of grooming in prevention of body fouling in the red swamp crayfish, Procambarus clarkii. Aquaculture. 208:39–49.10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00794-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman DA, Moore PA. 2003. Field observations of intraspecific agonistic behavior of two crayfish species, Orconectes rusticus and Orconectes virilis, in Different Habitats. Biol Bull. 205:26–35.10.2307/1543442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JH, Ross B, McCauley S, Dance S, Taylor AC, Huntingford FA. 2003. Resting metabolic rate and social status in juvenile giant freshwater prawns, Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Mar Fresh Behav Physiol. 36:31–40.10.1080/1023624021000054307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb JS, Tamm GR, Wang D. 1982. Behavioral mechanisms influencing molt frequency in the American lobster, Homarus americanus Milne Edwards. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 62:185–200.10.1016/0022-0981(82)90200-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins PA. 1997. Daily feeding rhythm of the prawn Macrobrachium borellii. Iheringia Ser Zool. 82:19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Dingemanse NJ, Réale D. 2005. Natural selection and animal personality. Behaviour. 142:1165–1190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gammell MP, de Vries HV, Jennings DJ, Carlin CM, Hayden T. 2003. David’s score: a more appropriate dominance ranking method than Clutton-Brock et al.’s index. Anim Behav. 66:601–605.10.1006/anbe.2003.2226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gareth A, Elwood RW. 2009. Assessment of fighting ability in animal contests. Anim Behav. 77:991–1004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heg D, Bender N, Hamilton I. 2004. Strategic growth decisions in helper cichlids. Proc R Soc Lond B. 271:S505–S508.10.1098/rsbl.2004.0232
   Google Scholar
• Hoogenboom MO, Armstrong JD, Groothuis TGG, Metcalfe NB. 2013. The growth benefits of aggressive behavior vary with individual metabolism and resource predictability. Behav Ecol. 24:253–261.10.1093/beheco/ars161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karplus I. 2005. Social control of growth in Macrobrachium rosenbergii (De Man): a review and prospects for future research. Aquacult Res. 36:238–254.10.1111/are.2005.36.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karplus I, Hulata G, Wohlfarth GW, Halevy A. 1987. The effect of size-grading juvenile Macrobrachium rosenbergii prior to stocking on their population structure and production in polyculture. Aquaculture. 62:85–95.10.1016/0044-8486(87)90313-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karplus I, Hulata G, Zafrir S. 1992. Social control of growth in Macrobrachium rosenbergii. IV. The mechanism of growth suppression in runts. Aquaculture. 106:275–283.10.1016/0044-8486(92)90259-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lammers JH, Warbutton K, Cribb BW. 2009. Diurnal refuge competition in the freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium australiense. J Crustac Biol. 29:476–483.10.1651/08-3093.1
   Google Scholar
• Lammers JH, Warburton K, Cribb BW. 2010. Individual competition and the emergence of density-dependent exposure to predation: how behaviors influence population processes. Adapt Behav. 18:17–182.
   Google Scholar
• De Lima PP, Pontes CS, Arruda MF. 2009. Activity pattern of the marine shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone 1931) in laboratory as a function of different feeding frequencies. Aquacult Res. 41:53–60.10.1111/are.2009.41.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariappan P, Balasundaram C, Schmitz B. 2000. Decapod crustacean chelipeds: an overview. J Biosci. 25:301–313.10.1007/BF02703939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurik LN, Wortham JL. 2011. The grooming behaviors of the hawaiian river shrimp. Macrobrachium grandimanus. J Crustac Biol. 31:617–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda-de la Lama GC, Sepúlveda WS, Montaldo HH, María GA, Galindo F. 2011. Social strategies associated with identity profiles in dairy goats. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 134:48–55.10.1016/j.applanim.2011.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakano S. 1995. Individual differences in resource use, growth and emigration under the influence of a dominance hierarchy in fluvial red-spotted Masu salmon in a natural habitat. J Anim Ecol. 64:75–84.10.2307/5828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patullo BW, Macmillan DL. 2005. Corners and bubble wrap: the structure and texture of surfaces influence crayfish exploratory behaviour. J Exp Biol. 209:567–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patullo BW, Baird HP, Macmillan DL. 2009. Altered aggression in different sized groups of crayfish supports a dynamic social behaviour model. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 120:231–237.10.1016/j.applanim.2009.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontes CS, Arruda MF. 2005. Comportamento de Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone) (Crustácea, Decapoda, Penaeidae) em função da oferta do alimento artificial nas fases clara e escura do período de 24 horas [Behavior of Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone) (Crustacea, Decapoda, Penaeidae) in relation to artificial food offer along light and dark phases in 24 h period]. Rev Bras Zool. 22:648–652. Portuguese.10.1590/S0101-81752005000300019
   Google Scholar
• Ra'Anan Z, Cohen D. 1984. The effect of group interactions on the development of size distribution in Macrobrachium rosenbergii (De Man) juvenile populations. Biol Bull. 166:22–31.10.2307/1541427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riebli T, Avgan B, Bottini A, Duc C, Taborsky M, Heg D. 2011. Behavioural type affects dominance and growth in staged encounters of cooperatively breeding cichlids. Anim Behav. 81:313–323.10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sih A, Bell A, Johnson JJ. 2004. Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol Evol. 19:372–378.10.1016/j.tree.2004.04.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva PF, Medeiros MS, Silva HPA. 2012. A study of feeding in the shrimp Farfantepenaeus subtilis indicates the value of species level behavioral data for optimizing culture management. Mar Fresh Behav Physiol. 45:121–134.10.1080/10236244.2012.693309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wacker S, de Jong K, Forsgren E, Amundsen T. 2012. Large males fight and court more across a range of social environments: an experiment on the two spotted goby Gobiusculus flavescens. J Fish Biol. 81:21–34.10.1111/jfb.2012.81.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar