Different encoding alternatives for the prediction of halogenated polymers glass transition temperature by quantitative structure–property relationships

References

• Van Krevelen, D. W. 1990. Properties of Polymers. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, X. 2010. Support vector machine-based QSPR for the prediction of glass transition temperatures of polymers. Fibers Polym. 11:757–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, S., J. J. Gormley, N. Roman, J. A. Shetter, and W. H. Watanabe. 1965. Glass temperatures of some acrylic polymers. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 3:3573–3586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bicerano, J. 1996. Prediction of Polymer Properties. New York: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Potts, J. R., D. R. Dreyer, C. W. Bielawski, and R. S. Ruoff. 2011. Graphene-based polymer nanocomposites. Polymer 52:5–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, K., Y. Zhang, J. Meng, E. Green, N. Tajaddod, H. Li, and M. Minus. 2013. Structural polymer-based carbon nanotube composite fibers: understanding the processing–structure–performance relationship. Materials 6:2543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, P.-C., N. A. Siddiqui, G. Marom, and J.-K. Kim. 2010. Dispersion and functionalization of carbon nanotubes for polymer-based nanocomposites: A review. Compos. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 41:1345–1367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katritzky, A. R., S. Sild, V. Lobanov, and M. Karelson. 1998. Quantitative structure−property relationship (QSPR) correlation of glass transition temperatures of high molecular weight polymers. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 38:300–304.
   Google Scholar
• Katritzky, A. R., P. Rachwal, K. W. Law, M. Karelson, and V. S. Lobanov. 1996. Prediction of polymer glass transition temperatures using a general quantitative structure−property relationship treatment. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 36:879–884.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, C., and Y. Lin. 2003. Correlation between the glass transition temperatures and repeating unit structure for high molecular weight polymers. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 43:643–650.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mattioni, B. E., and P. C. Jurs. 2002. Prediction of glass transition temperatures from monomer and repeat unit structure using computational neural networks. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 42:232–240.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen, X., L. Sztera, and H. Cartwright. 2008. A neural network approach to prediction of glass transition temperature of polymers. Int. J. Intell. Sys. 23:22–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, W., and C. Cao. 2009. Artificial neural network prediction of glass transition temperature of polymers. Colloid. Polym. Sci. 287:811–818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchowicz, P. R., S. E. Fioressi, D. E. Bacelo, L. M. Saavedra, A. P. Toropova, and A. A. Toropov. 2015. QSPR studies on refractive indices of structurally heterogeneous polymers. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 140:86–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercader, A. G., and P. R. Duchowicz. 2016. Encoding alternatives for the prediction of polyacrylates glass transition temperature by quantitative structure–property relationships. Mater. Chem. Phys. 172:158–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askadskii, A. A. 2003. Computational Materials Science of Polymers. Cambridge: Cambridge International Science Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rojas, C., P. Tripaldi, and P. R. Duchowicz. 2016. A new QSPR study on relative sweetness. Int. J. Quant. Struct.-Prop. Relat. 1:78–93.
   Google Scholar
• Rojas, C., P. R. Duchowicz, P. Tripaldi, and R. Pis Diez. 2015. Quantitative structure–property relationship analysis for the retention index of fragrance-like compounds on a polar stationary phase. J. Chromatogr. A 1422:277–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas, C., P. R. Duchowicz, P. Tripaldi, and R. P. Diez. 2015. QSPR analysis for the retention index of flavors and fragrances on a OV-101 column. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 140:126–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, L., and P. J. Rousseeuw. 2005. Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Tetko, I., J. Gasteiger, R. Todeschini, A. Mauri, D. Livingstone, P. Ertl, V. A. Palyulin, E. V. Radchenko, N. S. Zefirov, A. S. Makarenko, V. Y. Tanchuk, and V. V. Prokopenko. 2005. Virtual computational chemistry laboratory – Design and description. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 19:453–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DRAGON, Release 50 Evaluation Version. Available at: http://wwwdisatunimibit/chm (accessed March 7, 2016)
   Google Scholar
• Mercader, A. G., P. R. Duchowicz, F. M. Fernández, and E. A. Castro. 2011. Advances in the replacement and enhanced replacement method in QSAR and QSPR theories. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 51:1575–1581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A., A. G. Mercader, P. R. Duchowicz, E. A. Castro, and A. B. Pomilio. 2012. QSAR study of the DPPH radical scavenging activity of di(hetero)arylamines derivatives of benzo[b]thiophenes, halophenols and caffeic acid analogues. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 116:33–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercader, A. G., P. R. Duchowicz, F. M. Fernandez, and E. A. Castro. 2008. Modified and enhanced replacement method for the selection of molecular descriptors in QSAR and QSPR theories. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 92:138–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draper, N. R., and H. Smith. 1981. Applied Regression Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Mercader, A. G., P. R. Duchowicz, F. M. Fernandez, and E. A. Castro. 2010. Replacement method and enhanced replacement method versus the genetic algorithm approach for the selection of molecular descriptors in QSPR/QSAR theories. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 50:1542–1548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercader, A G., and P. R. Duchowicz. 2015. Enhanced replacement method integration with genetic algorithms populations in QSAR and QSPR theories. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 149:117–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxena, A. K., and P. Prathipati. 2003. Comparison of MLR, PLS and GA-MLR in QSAR analysis. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 14:433–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le, T., V. C. Epa, F. R. Burden, and D. A. Winkler. 2012. Quantitative structure–property relationship modeling of diverse materials properties. Chem. Rev. 112:2889–2919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wold, S., and L. Eriksson. 1995. Statistical validation of QSAR results. In Chemometrics Methods in Molecular Design, ed. H. V. D. Waterbeemd. Weinheim: VCH, pp. 309–318.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, D. M., S. Basak, and D. Mills. 2003. Assessing model fit by cross-validation. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 43:579–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravichran, V., S. Shalini, K. Sundram, and A. D. Sokkalingam. 2010. QSAR study of substituted 1,3,4-oxadiazole naphthyridines as HIV-1 integrase inhibitors. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 45:2791–2797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, K. 2007. On some aspects of validation of predictive quantitative structure–activity relationship models. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2:1567–1577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramatica, P. 2007. Principles of QSAR models validation: Internal and external. QSAR Comb. Sci. 26:694–701.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, L., J. Jaworska, A. P. Worth, M. T. Cronin, R. M. McDowell, and P. Gramatica. 2003. Methods for reliability and uncertainty assessment and for applicability evaluations of classification- and regression-based QSARs. Environ. Health Perspect. 111:1361–1375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golbraikh, A., and A. Tropsha. 2002. Beware of q2!. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 20:269–276.
   Google Scholar