Ductility design of RC columns. Part 1: consideration of axial compression ratio

References

• Standards New Zealand (SNZ). Concrete structure standard-the design of concrete structures (NZS 3101:Part 1:1995). Wellington, New Zealand: SNZ; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Buildings Department (HKBD). Code of practice for structural use of concrete 2004. Hong Kong: The HKSAR Government; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Buildings Department (HKBD). Code of practice for structural use of concrete 2013. Hong Kong: The HKSAR Government; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Park R. Ductile design approach for reinforced concrete frames. Earthq Spectra. 1986;2:565–619. doi: 10.1193/1.1585398
   Google Scholar
• CEN. Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings (EN 1998–1:2004). Brussels: European Committee for Standardization; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• National Standard of the People’s Republic of China. Code for seismic design of buildings (GB 50011-2010). Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Standards New Zealand (SNZ). Concrete structure standard-the design of concrete structures incorporating amendment No. 1 & 2 (NZS 3101:Part 1:2006-A1&A2). Wellington, New Zealand: SNZ; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Paulay T, Priestley MJN. Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley M, Calvi G, Kowalsky M. Displacement-based seismic design of structures. Pavia, Italy: IUSS Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Elwood KJ, Moehle JP. Dynamic collapse analysis for a reinforced concrete frame sustaining shear and axial failures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2008;37:991–1012. doi: 10.1002/eqe.787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sezen H. Seismic response and modeling of lightly reinforced concrete building columns. Berkeley (CA): University of California; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• CEN. Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 3: assessment and retrofitting of buildings (EN 1998-3). Brussels: European Committee for Standardization; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Biskinis D, Fardis M. Flexure-controlled ultimate deformations of members with continuous or lap-spliced bars. Struct Concr. 2010;11:93–108. doi: 10.1680/stco.2010.11.2.93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry M, Parrish M, Eberhard M. PEER structural performance database user’s manual. PEER research report. Berkeley (CA): University of California; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Biskinis DE, Fardis MN. Deformations at flexural yielding of members with continious or lap-spliced bars. Struct Concr. 2010;11:127–138. doi: 10.1680/stco.2010.11.3.127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappos A, Penelis G. Earthquake resistant concrete structures. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Borg RC, Rossetto T. Low cycle fatigue tests of reinforced concrete columns and joints, built with ribbed reinforcement and plain stirrups. 15th World Conf. Earthq Eng Lisbon Port. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Ahn JM, Shin SW. An evaluation of ductility of high-strength reinforced concrete columns subjected to reverse cyclic loads under axial compression. Mag Concr Res. 2007;59:29–44. doi: 10.1680/macr.2007.59.1.29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues H, Arêde A, Varum H, et al. Experimental evaluation of rectangular reinforced concrete column behaviour under biaxial cyclic loading. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2013;42:239–259. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim T, Kim Y, Shin HM. Seismic performance assessment of reinforced concrete bridge columns under variable axial load. Mag Concr Res. 2007;59:87–96. doi: 10.1680/macr.2007.59.2.87
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha S, Roy L. Fundamental tests of reinforced concrete columns subjected to seismic loading. Proc ICE – Struct Build. 2004;157:185–199. doi: 10.1680/stbu.2004.157.3.185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee TK, Chen CC, Pan ADE, et al. Experimental evaluation of large circular RC columns under pure compression. Struct Concr. 2013;14:60–68. doi: 10.1002/suco.201200012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park R. Evaluation of ductility of structures and structural assemblages from laboratory testing. Bull New Zeal Soc Earthq Eng. 1989;22:155–166.
   Google Scholar
• Yuen YP, Kuang JS. Effect of axial compression on ductility design of RC walls. Proc. ICE – Struct Build. 2015;168:554–569. doi: 10.1680/stbu.14.00024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Concrete Institute. Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318–14) and commentary. Farmington Hills (MI): ACI; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Standards New Zealand (SNZ). Structural design actions, Part 5: earthquake actions—New Zealand. Code and supplement. NZS 1170.5 SUPP 1:2004. Wellington, New Zealand: SNZ; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• ASCE. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (FEMA 356). Washington (DC): Building Seismic Safety Council, Federal Emergency Management Agency; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu X, Sato T, Jiang W, et al. Behavior of reinforced concrete column under high axial load. Proc 9th World Conf Earthq Eng. 1988. p. 353–358.
   Google Scholar