Interactions of barley α-amylase isozymes with Ca^2 +, substrates and proteinaceous inhibitors

References

• Abe J, Sidenius U, Svensson B. Arginine is essential for the α-amylase inhibitory activity of the α-amylase/subtilisin inhibitor (BASI) from barley seeds. Biochem J 1993; 293: 151–155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajandouz EH, Abe J, Svensson B, Marchis-Mouren G. Barley malt α-amylase. Purification, action pattern and subsite mapping of isozyme 1 and two members of the isozyme 2 subfamily using p-nitrophenylated maltooligosaccharide substrates. Biochim Biophys Acta 1992; 1159: 193–202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bak-Jensen KS, André G, Gottschalk TE, Paës G, Tran V, Svensson B. Tyrosine 105 and threonine 212 at outermost substrate binding subsites −6 and +4 control substrate specificity, oligosaccharide cleavage patterns, and mkultiple binding modes of barley α-amylase 1. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 10093–10102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bønsager BC, Prætorius-Ibba M, Nielsen PK, Svensson B. Purification and characterization of the β-trefoil fold protein barley α-amylase/subtilisin inhibitor overexpressed in Escherichia coli. Protein Express Purif 2003; 30: 185–193
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bønsager BC, Nielsen PK, Abou Hachem M, Prætorius-Ibba M, Svensson B. Mutational analysis of the β-trefoil fold protein barley α-amylase/subtilisin inhibitor probes hot spots for the interaction with barley α-amylase. J Biol Chem 2005; 280: 14855–14864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozonnet S, Kim T-J, Bønsager BC, Kramhøft B, Nielsen PK, Bak-Jensen KS, Svensson B. Engineering of barley α-amylase. Biocatal Biotrans 2003; 21: 209–214
   Google Scholar
• Brzozowski AM, Lawson DM, Turkenberg JP, Bisgård-Frantzen H, Svendsen A, Borchert TV, Dauter Z, Wilson KS, Davies G. Structural analysis of a chimeric bacterial alpha-amylase. High-resolution analysis of native and ligand complexes. Biochemistry 2000; 39: 9099–9107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush DA, Sticher L, Van Huystee RB, Wagner D, Jones RL. The calcium requirement for stability and enzymatic activity of two isoforms of barley α-amylase. J Biol Chem 1989; 264: 19392–19398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad B, Hoang V, Polley A, Hofemeister J. Hybrid Bacillus amyloliquefaciens X Bacillus licheniformis α-amylases: construction, properties and sequence determinants. Eur J Biochem 1995; 230: 481–490
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crameri A, Raillard SA, Bermudez E, Stemmer WP. DNA shuffling of a family of genes from diverse species accelerates directed evolution. Nature 1998; 391: 288–291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauter Z, Dauter M, Brzozowski AM, Christensen S, Borchert TV, Beier L, Wilson KS, Davies GJ. X-ray structure of Novamyl, the five-domain “maltogenic” alpha-amylase from Bacillus stearothermophilus: maltose and acarbose complexes at 1.7A resolution. Biochemistry 1999; 38: 8385–8392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitter J, Haber-Pohlmeier S. Structural stability and unfolding properties of thermostable bacterial alpha-amylases: a comparative study of homologous enzymes. Biochemistry 2004; 43: 9589–9599
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Franco OL, Rigden DJ, Melo FR, Grossi-de-Sà MF. Plant α-amylase inhibitors and their interaction with insect α-amylases. Structure, function and potential for crop protection. Eur J Biochem 2002; 269: 397–412
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fukuda, K, Jensen, MH, Aghajari, N, Haser, R, Svensson, B. (2005). Biased mutagenesis in the N-terminal region by degenerate oligonucleotide gene shuffling enhances secretory expression of barley α-amylase 2 in yeast. Protein Eng Des Sel, 18:515–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giardina T, Gunning AP, Juge N, Faulds CB, Furniss CSM, Svensson B, Morris VJ, Williamson G. Both binding sites of the starch-binding domain of Aspergillus niger glucoamylase are essential for inducing a conformational change in amylose. J Mol Biol 2001; 313: 1149–1159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson RM, Svensson B. Identification of tryptophanyl residues involved in binding of carbohydrate ligands to barley α-amylase 2. Carlsberg Res Commun 1987; 52: 373–379
   Google Scholar
• Gottschalk TE, Tull D, Aghajari N, Haser R, Svensson B. Specificity modulation of barley α-amylase through biased random mutagenesis involving a conserved tripeptide in β→α loop 7 of the catalytic (β/α)8-barrel domain. Biochemistry 2001; 40: 12844–12854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janecek S, Svensson B, MacGregor EA. Relation between domain evolution, specificity, and taxonomy of the α-amylase family members containing a C-terminal starch-binding domain. Eur J Biochem 2003; 270: 635–645
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jensen MT, Gottschalk TE, Svensson B. Differences in conformational stability of barley α-amylase isozymes 1 and 2. Role of charged groups and isozyme 2 specific salt-bridges. J Cereal Sci 2003; 38: 289–300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao J-A, Yee BC, Wong JH, Kobrehel K, Buchanan BB. Thioredoxin-linked changes in regulatory properties of barley α-amylase/subtilisin inhibitor protein. Plant Physiol Biochem 1993; 31: 799–804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juge N, Andersen JS, Tull D, Roepstorff P, Svensson B. Overexpression, purification, and characterization of recombinant barley α-amylase 1 and 2 secreted by the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. Protein Expr Purif 1996; 8: 204–214
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Juge N, Le Gal-Goëffet M-F, Furniss CSM, Gunning AP, Kramhøft B, Morris VJ, Williamson G, Svensson B. The starch binding domain of glucoamylase from Aspergillus niger: overview of its structure, function, and role in raw-starch degradation. Biologia 2002; 57/Suppl. 11: 239–245
   Google Scholar
• Juge N, Rodenburg KW, Guo X-J, Chaix J-C, Svensson B. Isozyme-hybrids within the protruding third loop domain of the barley α-amylase (β/α)8-barrel: implication for BASI sensitivity and substrate affinity. FEBS Lett 1995; 363: 299–303
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Juge N, Søgaard M, Chaix J-C, Martin-Eauclaire M-F, Svensson B, Marchis-Mouren G, Guo X-J. Comparison of barley malt α-amylase isozyme 1 and 2: Construction of cDNA hybrids by in vivo recombination, characterization and expression in yeast. Gene 1993; 130: 159–166
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kadziola A, Abe J, Svensson B, Haser R. Crystal and molecular structure of barley α-amylase. J Mol Biol 1994; 239: 104–121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadziola A, Søgaard M, Svensson B, Haser R. Molecular structure of a barley α-amylase-inhibitor complex: implications for starch binding and catalysis. J Mol Biol 1998; 278: 205–217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandra L, Gyemant G, Remenyik J, Hovanszki G, Liptak A. Action pattern and subsite mapping of Bacillus licheniformis alpha-amylase (BLA) with modified maltooligosaccharide substrates. FEBS Lett 2002; 518: 79–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, T-J, Bozonnet, S, Nielsen, PK, Svensson, B. 2003. Changes in enzymatic properties of barley α-amylase isozymes by chimerization. Proceedings 2003 Agricultural Biotechnology Symposium “Carbohydrate: Enzymes and Food Functionality” Seoul National University) pp 9–17.
   Google Scholar
• Kramhøft B, Bak-Jensen KS, Mori H, Juge N, Nøhr J, Svensson B. Multiple attack, kinetic parameters, and product profiles in amylose hydrolysis by barley α-amylase 1 variants. Biochemistry 2005; 44: 1824–1832
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larson SB, Greenwood A, Cascio D, Day J, McPherson A. Refined molecular structure of pig pancreatic alpha-amylase at 2.1 A resolution. J Mol Biol 1994; 235: 1560–1584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGregor EA. The proteinaceous inhibitor of limit dextrinase in barley and malt. Biochim Biophys Acta 2004; 1696: 165–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGregor EA, Janecek S, Svensson B. Relationship of sequence and structure to specificity in the α-amylase family of enzymes. Biochim Biophys Acta 2001; 1546: 1–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeda, K, Finnie, C, Svensson, B. (2005). Identification of thioredoxin h-reducible disulphides in proteomes by differential labeling of cysteines: Insight into recognition of proteins in barley seeds by thioredoxin h. Proteomics, 5:1634–1644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsui I, Svensson B. Improved activity and modulated action pattern obtained by random mutagenesis at the fourth β-α loop involved in substrate binding to the catalytic (β/α)8-barrel domain of barley α-amylase 1. J Biol Chem 1997; 272: 22456–22463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori H, Bak-Jensen KS, Gottschalk TE, Motawia MS, Damager I, Møller BL, Svensson B. Modulation of activity and substrate binding modes by single and double subsites +1/ + 2 and −5/ − 6 mutation of barley α-amylase 1. Eur J Biochem 2001; 268: 6545–6558
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mori H, Bak-Jensen KS, Svensson B. Barley α-amylase Met53 situated at the high-affinity subsite −2 belongs to a substrate binding motif in the β→α loop 2 of the catalytic (β/α)₈-barrel and is critical for activity and substrate specificity Eur J Biochem 2002; 269: 5377–5390
   Google Scholar
• Morris VJ, Gunning AP, Faulds CB, Williamson G, Svensson B. AFM images of complexes between amylose and Aspergillus niger glucoamylase mutants, native and mutant starch binding domains: a model for the action of glucoamylase. Starch 2005; 57: 1–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mundy J, Svendsen I, Hejgaard J. Barley α-amylase/subtilisin inhibitor. Isolation and characterization. Carlsberg Res Commun 1983; 48: 81–90
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen AD, Fuglsang CC, Westh P. Effect of calcium ions on the irreversible denaturation of a recombinant Bacillus halmapalus alpha-amylase: a calorimetric investigation. Biochem J 2003a; 373: 337–343
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nielsen PK, Bønsager BC, Berland CR, Sigurskjold BW, Svensson B. Kinetics and energetics of the binding between barley α-amylase/subtilisin inhibitor and barley α-amylase 2 analyzed by surface plasmon resonance and isothermal titration calorimetry. Biochemistry 2003b; 42: 1478–1487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohdan K, Kuriki T, Takata H, Kaneko H, Okada S. Introduction of raw starch-binding domains into Bacillus subtilis α-amylase by fusion with the starch-binding domain of Bacillus cyclomaltodextrin glucanotransferase. Appl Environ Microbiol 2000; 66: 3058–3064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penninga D, van der Veen BA, Knegtel RM, van Hijum SA, Rozeboom HJ, Kalk KH, Dijkstra BW, Dijkhuizen L. The raw starch binding domain of cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase from Bacillus circulans strain 251. J Biol Chem 1996; 271: 32777–32784
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert X, Gottschalk TE, Haser R, Svensson B, Aghajari N. Expression, purification and preliminary crystallographic studies of α-amylase isozyme 1 from barley seeds. Acta Cryst. 2002a; D58: 683–686
   Google Scholar
• Robert, X, Haser, R, Svensson, B, Aghajari, N. (2002b). Comparison of crystal structures of barley α-amylase 1 and 2: implications for isozyme differences in stability and activity. Biologia 57/Suppl. 11, 59–70.
   Google Scholar
• Robert X, Haser R, Gottschalk TE, Ratajczak F, Driguez H, Svensson B, Aghajari N. The structure of barley α-amylase 1 reveals a novel role of domain C in substrate recognition and binding: “A pair of sugar tongs”. Structure 2003; 11: 973–984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robyt JF, French D. Multiple attack hypothesis of α-amylase action: action of porcine pancreatic, human salivary, and Aspergillus oryzae α-amylase. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1967; 122: 8–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodenburg KW, Juge N, Guo X-J, Søgaard M, Chaix J-C, Svensson B. Domain B protruding at the third β-strand of the α/β-barrel in barley α-amylase confers distinct isozyme-specific properties. Eur J Biochem 1994; 221: 277–284
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rodenburg KW, Vallée F, Juge N, Aghajari N, Guo X-J, Haser R, Svensson B. Specific inhibition of barley α-amylase 2 by barley α-amylase/subtilisin inhibitor depends on charge interactions and can be conferred to isozyme 1 by mutation. Eur J Biochem 2000; 267: 1019–1029
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Savchenko A, Vieille C, Kang S, Zeikus JG. Pyrococcus furiosus α-amylase is stabilized by calcium and zinc. Biochemistry 2002; 41: 6193–6201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidenius U, Olsen K, Svensson B, Christensen U. Stopped-flow kinetics of the reaction of barley α-amylase/subtilisin inhibitor and the high pI barley α-amylase. FEBS Lett 1995; 361: 320–254
   Google Scholar
• Skov LK, Mirza O, Sprogøe D, Dar I, Remaud-Simeon M, Albenne C, Monsan P, Gajhede M. Oligosaccharide and sucrose complexes of amylosucrase. Structural implications for the polymerase activity. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 47741–47747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Søgaard M, Kadziola A, Haser R, Svensson B. Site-directed mutagenesis of histidine 93, aspartic acid 180, glutamic acid 205, histidine 290, and aspartic acid 291 at the active site and tryptophan 279 at the raw starch binding site in barley α-amylase 1. J Biol Chem 1993; 268: 22480–22484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Søgaard M, Svensson B. Expression of cDNAs encoding barley α-amylase 1 and 2 in yeast and characterization of the secreted proteins. Gene 1990; 94: 173–179
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sorimachi K, Le Gal-Coëffet M-F, Willamson G, Archer DB, Williamson MP. Solution structure of the granular starch binding domain of glucoamylase from Aspergillus niger bound to β-cyclodextrin. Structure 1997; 5: 647–661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strokopytov B, Knegtel RM, Penninga D, Rozeboom HJ, Kalk KH, Dijkhuizen L, Dijkstra BW. Structure of cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase complexed with a maltononaose inhibitor at 2.6 angstrom resolution. Implications for product specificity. Biochemistry 1996; 35: 4241–4249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson B, Fukuda K, Nielsen PK, Bønsager BC. Proteinaceous α-amylase inhibitors. Biochim Biophys Acta 2004; 1696: 145–156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson B, Mundy J, Gibson RM, Svendsen I. Partial amino acid sequences of α-amylase isozymes from barley malt. Carlsberg Res Commun 1985; 50: 15–22
   Google Scholar
• Tranier, S, Deville, K, Robert, X, Bozonnet, S, Haser, R, Svensson, B, Aghajari, N. 2005. Insights into the “pair of sugar tongs” surface binding site in barley α-amylase isozymes and crystallization of appropriate sugar tongs mutants. Biologia, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Vallée F, Kadziola A, Bourne Y, Juy M, Rodenburg KW, Svensson B, Haser R. Barley α-amylase inhibitor bound to its endogenous protein inhibitor BASI: crystal structure of the complex at 1.9 Å resolution. Structure 1998; 6: 649–659
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yuuki T, Nomura T, Tezuka H, Tsuboi A, Yamagata H, Tsukagoshi N, Udaka S. Complete nucleotide sequence of a gene coding of heat- and pH-stable α-amylase of Bacillus licheniformis: comparison of the amino acid sequences. J Biochem (Tokyo) 1985; 98: 1147–1156
   PubMedGoogle Scholar