Designing synthetic microbial communities for effectual bioremediation: A review

References

• Ahmad F, Anwar S, Firdous S, Da-Chuan Y, Iqbal S. 2018. Biodegradation of bispyribac sodium by a novel bacterial consortium BDAM: optimization of degradation conditions using response surface methodology. J Hazard Mater. 349:272–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad F, Ashraf N, Da-Chuan Y, Jabeen H, Anwar S, Wahla AQ, Iqbal S. 2019. Application of a novel bacterial consortium BDAM for bioremediation of bispyribac sodium in wheat vegetated soil. J Hazard Mater. 374:58–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora PK, Kumar M, Chauhan A, Raghava GP, Jain RK. 2009. OxDBase: a database of oxygenases involved in biodegradation. BMC Res Notes. 2:67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Basharat Z, Bibi M ,Yasmin A. 2020. Implications of molecular docking assay for bioremediation. In: Khosrow-Pour M, editor. Data analytics in medicine: concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. Hershey, PA: IGI Global; pp. 1556–1577.
   Google Scholar
• Ben Said S, Or D. 2017. Synthetic microbial ecology: engineering habitats for modular consortia. Front Microbiol. 8:1125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharagava RN, Purchase D, Saxena G, Mulla SI. 2019. Applications of metagenomics in microbial bioremediation of pollutants: from genomics to environmental cleanup. In: Das S, Dash H, editors. Microbial diversity in the genomic era. Amsterdam: Academic Press; p. 459–477.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatia SK, Bhatia RK, Choi YK, Kan E, Kim YG, Yang YH. 2018. Biotechnological potential of microbial consortia and future perspectives. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 38(8):1209–1229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya M, Guchhait S, Biswas D, Singh R. 2019. Evaluation of a microbial consortium for crude oil spill bioremediation and its potential uses in enhanced oil recovery. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 18:101034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonifay V, Aydin E, Aktas DF, Sunner J, Suflita JM. 2017. Metabolic profiling and metabolomic procedures for investigating the biodegradation of hydrocarbons. In: McGenity TJ, Timmis KN, Nogales B, editors. Hydrocarbon and lipid microbiology protocols: genetic, genomic and system analyses of communities. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; pp. 111–161.
   Google Scholar
• Bordbar A, Monk JM, King ZA, Palsson BO. 2014. Constraint-based models predict metabolic and associated cellular functions. Nat Rev Genet. 15(2):107–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappelletti M, Frascari D, Pinelli D, Mezzetti F, Fedi S, Zannoni D. 2017. Aerobic cometabolism of 1, 1, 2, 2-TeCA by a propane-growing microbial consortium (C2): diversity of alkane monooxygenase genes and design of an on-site bioremediation process. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation. 119:649–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty R, Wu CH, Hazen TC. 2012. Systems biology approach to bioremediation. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 23(3):483–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler DP, Kukhtin A, Mokhiber R, Knickerbocker C, Ogles D, Rudy G, Golova J, Long P, Peacock A. 2010. Monitoring microbial community structure and dynamics during in situ U(VI) bioremediation with a field-portable microarray analysis system. Environ Sci Technol. 44(14):5516–5522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Che S, Men Y. 2019. Synthetic microbial consortia for biosynthesis and biodegradation: promises and challenges. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 46(9–10):1343–1358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damborsky J, Brezovsky J. 2014. Computational tools for designing and engineering enzymes. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 19:8–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dangi AK, Sharma B, Hill RT, Shukla P. 2019. Bioremediation through microbes: systems biology and metabolic engineering approach. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 39(1):79–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lorenzo V. 2008. Systems biology approaches to bioremediation. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 19(6):579–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai C, Pathak H, Madamwar D. 2010. Advances in molecular and “-omics” technologies to gauge microbial communities and bioremediation at xenobiotic/anthropogen contaminated sites. Bioresour Technol. 101(6):1558–1569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias GM, de Sousa Pires A, Grilo VS, Castro MR, de Figueiredo Vilela L, Neves BC. 2019. Comparative genomics of Paraburkholderia kururiensis and its potential in bioremediation, biofertilization, and biocontrol of plant pathogens. Microbiology Open. 8:00801.
   Google Scholar
• Duarte M, Nielsen A, Camarinha Silva A, Vilchez-Vargas R, Bruls T, Wos-Oxley ML, Jauregui R, Pieper DH. 2017. Functional soil metagenomics: elucidation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degradation potential following 12 years of in situ bioremediation. Environ Microbiol. 19(8):2992–3011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flahaut NA, Wiersma A, van de Bunt B, Martens DE, Schaap PJ, Sijtsma L, Dos Santos VA, de Vos WM. 2013. Genome-scale metabolic model for Lactococcus lactis MG1363 and its application to the analysis of flavor formation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 97(19):8729–8739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulekar MH, Sharma J. 2008. Bioinformatics applied in bioremediation. Innov Rom Food Biotechno. 3(28):28–36.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert ES, Walker AW, Keasling JD. 2003. A constructed microbial consortium for biodegradation of the organophosphorus insecticide parathion. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 61(1):77–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goyal P, Basniwal RK. 2017. Environmental bioremediation: biodegradation of xenobiotic compounds. In: Hashmi MZ, Kumar V, Varma A,editors. Xenobiotics in the soil environment. Cham (Switzerland): Springer; pp. 347–371.
   Google Scholar
• Guerra AB, Oliveira JS, Silva-Portela RC, Araújo W, Carlos AC, Vasconcelos AT, Freitas AT, Domingos YS, de Farias MF, Fernandes GJ, et al. 2018. Metagenome enrichment approach used for selection of oil-degrading bacteria consortia for drill cutting residue bioremediation. Environ Pollut. 235:869–880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Z, Gentry TJ, Schadt CW, Wu L, Liebich J, Chong SC, Huang Z, Wu W, Gu B, Jardine P, et al. 2007. GeoChip: a comprehensive microarray for investigating biogeochemical, ecological and environmental processes. Isme J. 1(1):67–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Yang X, Wu Q, Mai S, Chi H. 2019. Application of independent immobilization in benzo[a]pyrene biodegradation by synthetic microbial consortium. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 26(20):21052–21058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iman M, Sobati T, Panahi Y, Mobasheri M. 2017. Systems biology approach to bioremediation of nitroaromatics: constraint-based analysis of 2, 4, 6-trinitrotoluene biotransformation by Escherichia coli. Molecules. 22(8):1242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadeja NB, Moharir P, Kapley A. 2019. Genome sequencing and analysis of strains Bacillus sp. AKBS9 and Acinetobacter sp. AKBS16 for biosurfactant production and bioremediation. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 187(2):518–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafari M, Danesh YR, Ghoosta Y. 2013. Molecular techniques in fungal bioremediation. In: Goltapeh ME, Danesh YR, Ajit Varma A, editors. Fungi as bioremediators. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; pp. 453–465.
   Google Scholar
• Jaiswal S, Sharma B, Shukla P. 2020. Integrated approaches in microbial degradation of plastics. Environ Technol Innov. 17:100567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaiswal S, Shukla P. 2020. Alternative strategies for microbial remediation of pollutants via synthetic biology. Front Microbiol. 11: 808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaiswal S, Singh DK, Shukla P. 2019. Gene editing and systems biology tools for pesticide bioremediation: a review. Front Microbiol. 10:87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns NI, Blazejewski T, Gomes AL, Wang HH. 2016. Principles for designing synthetic microbial communities. Curr Opin Microbiol. 31:146–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapley A, Jadeja NB, Paliwal V, Yadav TC, Purohit HJ. 2016. Microbial genomics and bioremediation of industrial wastewater. In Ram Chandra R, editor. Environmental waste management. London, UK: CRC Press; pp. 199–230.
   Google Scholar
• Khan F, Sajid M, Cameotra SS. 2013. In silico approach for the bioremediation of toxic pollutants. J Pet Environ Biotechnol. 04(06):2.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar Singh P, Shukla P. 2015. Systems biology as an approach for deciphering microbial interactions. Brief Funct Genomics. 14(2):166–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar V, Baweja M, Singh PK, Shukla P. 2016. Recent developments in systems biology and metabolic engineering of Plant-Microbe Interactions. Front Plant Sci. 7:1421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lama P, Zhou X. 2012. Aroma: automated resource allocation and configuration of map reduce environment in the cloud. In: Jose S, editor. Proceedings of the 9th international conference on autonomic computing. New York (NY): ACM; pp. 63–72.
   Google Scholar
• Lee JK, Kalia VC. 2020. Mapping microbial capacities for bioremediation: genes to genomics. Indian J Microbiol. 60(1):45–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang Y, Li G, Van Nostrand JD, He Z, Wu L, Deng Y, Zhang X, Zhou J. 2009. Microarray-based analysis of microbial functional diversity along an oil contamination gradient in oil field. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 70(2):324–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzo V. 2017. Synthetic microbiology: from analogy to methodology. Microbiol Biotechnol. 10:1264–1266.
   Google Scholar
• Mienda BS, Shamsir MS. 2015. An overview of pathway prediction tools for synthetic design of microbial chemical factories. AIMS Bioeng. 2:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandavara A, Sagar AL, Madikonda AK, Siddavattam D. 2016. Proteomics of Sphingobium indicum B90A for a deeper understanding of hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) bioremediation. Rev Environ Health. 31:57–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okino-Delgado CH, Zanutto-Elgui MR, do Prado DZ, Pereira MS, Fleuri LF. 2019. Enzymatic bioremediation: current status, challenges of obtaining process, and applications. In: Microbial metabolism of xenobiotic compounds. Singapore: Springer; pp. 79–101.
   Google Scholar
• Öztürk SE, Göktay M, Has C, Babaoğlu M, Allmer J, Doğanlar S, Frary A. 2018. Transcriptomic analysis of boron hyperaccumulation mechanisms in Puccinellia distans. Chemosphere. 199:390–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paliwal V, Puranik S, Purohit HJ. 2012. Integrated perspective for effective bioremediation. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 166(4 ):903–924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey A, Tripathi PH, Tripathi AH, Pandey SC, Gangola S. 2019. Omics technology to study bioremediation and respective enzymes. In: Bhatt P, editor. Smart bioremediation technologies. Amsterdam: Academic Press; pp. 23–43.
   Google Scholar
• Park JM, Kim TY, Lee SY. 2009. Constraints-based genome-scale metabolic simulation for systems metabolic engineering. Biotechnol Adv. 27(6):979–988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinu FR, Beale DJ, Paten AM, Kouremenos K, Swarup S, Schirra HJ, Wishart D. 2019. Systems biology and multi-omics integration: viewpoints from the metabolomics research community. Metabolites. 9(4):76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian X, Chen L, Sui Y, Chen C, Zhang W, Zhou J, Dong W, Jiang M, Xin F, Ochsenreither K. 2020. Biotechnological potential and applications of microbial consortia. Biotechnol Adv. 40:107500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raimondo EE, Saez JM, Briceño GE, Fuentes MS, Benimeli CS. 2018. Pesticide bioremediation: an approach for environmental cleanup using microbial consortia. In: Fuentes MS, Colin VL, Saez JM, editors. Strategies for bioremediation of organic and inorganic pollutants. London, UK: CRC Press; pp. 108–130.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez A, Castrejón-Godínez ML, Salazar-Bustamante E, Gama-Martínez Y, Sánchez-Salinas E, Mussali-Galante P, Tovar-Sánchez E, Ortiz-Hernández ML. 2020. Omics approaches to pesticide biodegradation. Curr Microbiol. 77(4):519–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankara Subramanian SH, Balachandran KRS, Rangamaran VR, Gopal D, Reme DB. 2019. Tool for rapid prediction of enzymes involved in bioremediation from high-throughput metagenome data sets. J Comput Biol. 27(7):1020–1029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider T, Riedel K. 2010. Environmental proteomics: analysis of structure and function of microbial communities. Proteomics. 10(4):785–798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma B, Dangi AK, Shukla P. 2018. Contemporary enzyme based technologies for bioremediation: a review. J Environ Manage. 210:10–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma V, Kumar R, Sharma VK, Kumar Yadav A, Tiirola M, Sharma PK. 2020. Expression, purification, characterization and in silico analysis of newly isolated hydrocarbon degrading bleomycin resistance dioxygenase. Mol Biol Rep. 47(1):533–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shekhar SK, Godheja J, Modi DR. 2020. Molecular technologies for assessment of bioremediation and characterization of microbial communities at pollutant-contaminated sites. In: Saxena G, Bharagava RN, editors. Bioremediation of industrial waste for environmental safety. Singapore: Springer; pp. 437–474.
   Google Scholar
• Shukla N. 2017. Bioinformatics in environmental bioremediation-a review. Int J Sci Res Sci Eng Technol. 3:195–205.
   Google Scholar
• Singh RP, Manchanda G, Li ZF, Rai AR. 2017. Insight of proteomics and genomics in environmental bioremediation. In Bhakta JN, editor. Handbook of research on inventive bioremediation techniques. Hershey, PA: IGI Globall; pp. 46–69.
   Google Scholar
• Singh OV, Nagaraj NS. 2006. Transcriptomics, proteomics and interactomics: unique approaches to track the insights of bioremediation. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic. 4(4):355–362.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Singh NS, Sharma R, Singh DK. 2019. Identification of enzyme(s) capable of degrading endosulfan and endosulfan sulfate using in silico techniques. Enzyme Microb Technol. 124:32–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan S, Sadasivam SK. 2018. Exploring docking and aerobic-microaerophilic biodegradation of textile azo dye by bacterial systems. J Water Process Eng. 22:180–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan S, Sadasivam SK, Gunalan S, Shanmugam G, Kothandan G. 2019. Application of docking and active site analysis for enzyme linked biodegradation of textile dyes. Environ Pollut. 248:599–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Techtmann SM, Hazen TC. 2016. Metagenomic applications in environmental monitoring and bioremediation. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 43(10):1345–1354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toya Y, Shimizu H. 2013. Flux analysis and metabolomics for systematic metabolic engineering of microorganisms. Biotechnol Adv. 31(6):818–826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathi M, Singh DN, Vikram S, Singh VS, Kumar S. 2018. Metagenomic approach towards bioprospection of novel biomolecule (s) and environmental bioremediation. ARRB. 22(2):1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Verma S, Kuila A. 2019. Bioremediation of heavy metals by microbial process. Environ Technol Inno. 14:100369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viant MR, Sommer U. 2013. Mass spectrometry based environmental metabolomics: a primer and review. Metabolomics. 9(S1):144–158.
   Google Scholar
• Vinas M, Grifoll M, Sabate J, Solanas AM. 2002. Biodegradation of a crude oil by three microbial consortia of different origins and metabolic capabilities. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 28(5):252–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whicher JR, Smaga SS, Hansen DA, Brown WC, Gerwick WH, Sherman DH, Smith JL. 2013. Cyanobacterial polyketide synthase docking domains: a tool for engineering natural product biosynthesis. Chem Biol. 20(11):1340–1351.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yadav S, Bhardwaj Y, Singh A. 2019. Functional genomics and system biology approach in bioremediation of soil and water from organic and inorganic pollutants. In: Tripathi V, Kumar P, Tripathi P, Kishore A, editors. Microbial genomics in sustainable agroecosystems. Singapore: Springer; pp. 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Yan DZ, Mao LQ, Li CZ, Liu J. 2015. Biodegradation of hexachlorobenzene by a constructed microbial consortium. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 31(2):371–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye S, Zeng G, Wu H, Liang J, Zhang C, Dai J, Xiong W, Song B, Wu S, Yu J. 2019. The effects of activated biochar addition on remediation efficiency of co-composting with contaminated wetland soil. Resour Conserv Recycl. 140:278–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye S, Zeng G, Wu H, Zhang C, Dai J, Liang J, Yu J, Ren X, Yi H, Cheng M, et al. 2017. Biological technologies for the remediation of co-contaminated soil. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 37(8):1062–1076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar