In total smartness: the institutional logics perspective on the Internet of things and people

References

• Aggarwal, P. 2004. “The Effects of Brand Relationship Norms on Consumer Attitudes and Behavior.” Journal of Consumer Research 31 (1): 87–101. doi:10.1086/383426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansari, S., and N. Phillips. 2011. “Text Me! New Consumer Practices and Change in Organizational Fields.” Organization Science 22 (6): 1579–1599. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aquino, S. 2021. “The AmazonBasics Microwave with Alexa Shows How Gimmicks Are Gold.” Forbes.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, R. S. 2005. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 37: 219–253
   Google Scholar
• Bataineh, A. S., R. Mizouni, J. Bentahar, and M. El Barachi. 2020. “Toward Monetizing Personal Data: A Two-Sided Market Analysis.” Future Generation Computer Systems 111: 435–459. doi:10.1016/j.future.2019.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudier, P., C. Ammi, and M. Deboeuf-Rouchon. 2020. “Smart Home: Highly-Educated Students’ Acceptance.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 153: 119355. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R. 2019. “Machines and Artificial Intelligence.” Journal of Marketing Behavior 4 (1): 11–30. doi:10.1561/107.00000058.
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R., and M. Kniazeva. 2018. “Morphing Anthropomorphism: An Update.” Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science 28 (3): 239–247. doi:10.1080/21639159.2018.1466659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R., H. Weijo, and R. V. Kozinets. 2021. “Enchantment and Perpetual Desire: Theorizing Disenchanted Enchantment and Technology Adoption.” Marketing Theory 21 (1): 25–52. doi:10.1177/1470593120961461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benard, S., and L. Doan. 2011. “The Conflict–Cohesion Hypothesis: Past, Present, and Possible Futures.” In Advances in Group Processes, edited by S. R. Thye, and E. J. Lawler, Vol. 28, 189–225. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bernal, N., and T. Hoggins. 2019. “Rage against the Machine: How Employees Are Fighting Back against Robot ‘Colleagues.’” The Guardian.
   Google Scholar
• Besharov, M. L., and W. K. Smith. 2014. “Multiple Institutional Logics in Organizations: Explaining Their Varied Nature and Implications.” Academy of Management Review 39: 364–381. doi:10.5465/amr.2011.0431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettany, S., and B. Kerrane. 2011. “The (Post-Human) Consumer, the (Post-Avian) Chicken and the (Post-Object) Eglu: Towards a Material-Semiotics of Anti-Consumption.” European Journal of Marketing 45 (11/12): 1746–1756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjerregaard, T., and C. Jonasson. 2014. “Managing Unstable Institutional Contradictions: The Work of Becoming.” Organization Studies 35: 1507–1536. doi:10.1177/0170840614530913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, M., and W. Gardner. 1996. “Who Is This ‘We’? Levels of Collective Identity and Self Representations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71: 83–93. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunduchi, R., A. Smart, K. Charles, L. McKee, and A. Azura-Blanco. 2015. “When Innovation Fails: An Institutional Perspective of the (Non)Adoption of Boundary Spanning IT Innovation.” Information & Management 52: 563–576. doi:10.1016/j.im.2015.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canniford, R., and D. Bajde, eds. 2016. Assembling Consumption: Researching Actors, Networks and Markets. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carrington, M. J., and J. L. Ozanne. 2022. “Becoming through Contiguity and Lines of Flight: The Four Faces of Celebrity-Proximate Assemblages.” Journal of Consumer Research 48 (5): 858–884. doi:10.1093/jcr/ucab026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castelo, N., M. W. Bos, and D. R. Lehmann. 2019. “Task-Dependent Algorithm Aversion.” Journal of Marketing Research 56 (5): 809–825. doi:10.1177/0022243719851788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuah, S., P. A. Rauschnabel, N. Krey, B. Nguyen, T. Ramayah, and S. Lade. 2016. “Wearable Technologies: The Role of Usefulness and Visibility in Smartwatch Adoption.” Computers in Human Behavior 65: 276–284. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, T., R. Montoya, and C. Insko. 2006. “Group Morality and Intergroup Relations: Cross-Cultural and Experimental Evidence.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32: 1559–1572. doi:10.1177/0146167206291673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, K. 2021. The Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and C. N. Poth. 2018. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. Choosing Among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Darmody, A., and D. Zwick. 2020. “Manipulate to Empower: Hyper-Relevance and the Contradictions of Marketing in the Age of Surveillance Capitalism.” Big Data & Society 7 (1). doi:10.1177/2053951720904112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dastin, J. 2018. “Amazon Scraps Secret AI Recruiting Tool That Showed Bias against Women.” Reuters.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schitzophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Vaujany, F. X., A. Adrot, E. Boxenbaum, and B. Leca. 2019. Materiality in Institutions: Spaces, Embodiment and Technology in Management and Organization. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J. 1983. Explaining Technical Change: A Case Study in the Philosophy of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, M., and A. W. Mathews. 2019. “Researchers Find Racial Bias in Hospital Algorithm.” The Wall Street Journal.
   Google Scholar
• Faik, I., M. Barrett, and E. Oborn. 2020. “How Information Technology Matters in Societal Change: An Affordance-Based Institutional Perspective.” MIS Quarterly 44: 1359–1390. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2020/14193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fell, J., T. Greene, J. C. Wang, and P. Y. Kuo. 2020. “Beyond Human-Centered Design: Proposing a Biocentric View on Design Research Involving Vegetal Subjects.” Companion Publication of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference 209–214.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, G. 1973. Traditional Societies and Technological Change. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Fournier, S. 1998. “Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research.” Journal of Consumer Research 24 (4): 343–353. doi:10.1086/209515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fournier, S., and C. Alvarez. 2012. “Brands as Relationship Partners: Warmth, Competence, and in-between.” Journal of Consumer Psychology 22 (2): 177–185. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2011.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco, P., R. Canniford, and M. Phipps. 2022. “Object-Oriented Marketing Theory.” Marketing Theory 22: 401–420. doi:10.1177/14705931221079407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, C., and F. Louça. 2001. As Time Goes by: The Information Revolution and the Industrial Revolutions in Historical Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedland, R. 2018. “Moving Institutional Logics Forward: Emotion and Meaningful Material Practice.” Organization Studies 39 (4): 515–542. doi:10.1177/0170840617709307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedland, R., and R. Alford. 1991. “Bringing Society Back in: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by W. Powell, and P. DiMaggio, 232–263. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ghaffari, M., A. Jafari, and O. Sandikci. 2019. “The Role of Mundane and Subtle Institutional Work in Market Dynamics: A Case of Fashion Clothing Market.” Journal of Business Research 105: 434–442. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosain, S. 2004. “Enterprise Information Systems as Objects and Carriers of Institutional Forces: The New Iron Cage?” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 5: 151–182. doi:10.17705/1jais.00049.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, D. 2014. Doing Research in the Real World. 3rd ed. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, T. 2013. “The Rise of the ‘Quantified Self’ in Health Care.” Wall Street Journal.
   Google Scholar
• Hern, A. 2015. “Computers Now Better Than Humans at Recognising and Sorting Images.” The Guardian.
   Google Scholar
• Hern, A. 2018. “Google’s ‘Deceitful’ AI Assistant to Identify Itself as a Robot during Calls.” The Guardian.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, K. 2011. “Adventures in Self-Surveillance, aka the Quantified Self, aka Extreme Navel-Gazing.” Forbes.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, D. L., and T. P. Novak. 2018. “Consumer and Object Experience in the Internet of Things: An Assemblage Theory Approach.” Journal of Consumer Research 44 (6): 1178–1204. doi:10.1093/jcr/ucx105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, N. 2020. “Internet of Things: Smart Cities Pick Up the Pace.” Financial Times.
   Google Scholar
• Huff, A. D., A. Humphreys, and S. J. Wilner. 2021. “The Politicization of Objects: Meaning and Materiality in the U.S. Cannabis Market.” Journal of Consumer Research 48 (1): 22–50. doi:10.1093/jcr/ucaa061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humayun, M., and R. Belk. 2020. “The Analogue Diaries of Postdigital Consumption.” Journal of Marketing Management 36 (7-8): 633–659. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2020.1724178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, A. 2010a. “Megamarketing: The Creation of Markets as a Social Process.” Journal of Marketing 74 (2): 1–19. doi:10.1509/jm.74.2.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, A. 2010b. “Semiotic Structure and the Legitimation of Consumption Practices: The Case of Casino Gambling.” Journal of Consumer Research 37 (3): 490–510. doi:10.1086/652464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indsetviken. 2020. Kutter strømmen til de som ikke vil bytte måler – Hanne har allerede vært uten strøm ett år. NRK.
   Google Scholar
• Ishowo-Oloko, F., J. Bonnefon, Z. Soroye, et al. 2019. “Behavioural Evidence for a Transparency–Efficiency Tradeoff in Human–Machine Cooperation.” Nature Machine Intelligence 1: 517–521. doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0113-5.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, T. B., A. Kjærgaard, and P. Svejvig. 2009. “Using Institutional Theory with Sensemaking Theory: A Case Study of Information System Implementation in Healthcare.” Journal of Information Technology 24: 343–353. doi:10.1057/jit.2009.11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen, C. B., and S. B. Waldorff. 2017. “What Are Institutional Logics and Where Is the Perspective Taking Us?” In New Themes in Institutional Analysis, edited by G. Krücken, C. Mazza, R. E. Meyer, and P. Walgenbach, 51–76. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C. 2019. “Postface: Exploring the Material in Institutional Theory.” In Materiality in Institutions. Technology, Work and Globalization, edited by F. X. de Vaujany, A. Adrot, E. Boxenbaum, and B. Leca, 383–395. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C., E. Boxenbaum, and C. Anthony. 2013. “The Immateriality of Material Practices in Institutional Logics.” In Institutional Logics in Action, edited by M. Lounsbury, and E. Boxenbaum, Vol. 39, Part A, 51–75. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C., and F. G. Massa. 2013. “From Novel Practice to Consecrated Exemplar: Unity Temple as a Case of Institutional Evangelizing.” Organization Studies 34: 1099–1136. doi:10.1177/0170840613492073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C., R. Meyer, D. Jancsary, and M. Höllerer. 2017. “The Material and Visual Basis of Institutions.” In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, and R. E. Meyer, 2nd ed., 621–646. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, D. L. 1989. Participant Observation: A Methodology for Human Studies. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kelman, H. 2006. “Interests, Relationships, Identities: Three Central Issues for Individuals and Groups in Negotiating Their Social Environment.” Annual Review of Psychology 57: 1–26. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesler, S., L. Sproull, and K. Waters. 1996. “A Prisoner’s Dilemma Experiment on Cooperation with People and Human-Like Computers.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 (1): 47–65. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. J., and D.-H. Shin. 2015. “An acceptance Model for Smart Watches: Implications for the Adoption of Future Wearable Technology.” Internet Research 25: 527–541. doi:10.1108/IntR-05-2014-0126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. 2008. “Technology/Ideology: How Ideological Fields Influence Consumers’ Technology Narratives.” Journal of Consumer Research 34 (6): 865–881. doi:10.1086/523289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V., D. A. Ferreira, and P. Chimenti. 2021. “How Do Platforms Empower Consumers? Insights from the Affordances and Constraints of Reclame Aqui.” Journal of Consumer Research 48 (3): 428–455. doi:10.1093/jcr/ucab014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V., and U. Gretzel. 2021. “Commentary: Artificial Intelligence: The Marketer’s Dilemma.” Journal of Marketing 85 (1): 156–159. doi:10.1177/0022242920972933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R., A. Patterson, and R. Ashman. 2017. “Networks of Desire: How Technology Increases Our Passion to Consume.” Journal of Consumer Research 43 (5): 659–682. doi:10.1093/jcr/ucw061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusiak, A. 2018. “Smart manufacturing.” International Journal of Production Research 56 (1-2): 508–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, D. J., J. van Doorn, I. C. Ng, S. Stieglitz, A. Lazovik, and A. Boonstra. 2021. “The Internet of Everything: Smart Things and Their Impact on Business Models.” Journal of Business Research 122: 853–863. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B., and G. Dover. 2015. “Place and Institutional Work: Creating Housing for the Hard-to-House.” Administrative Science Quarterly 60 (3): 371–410. doi:10.1177/0001839215589813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B., C. Hardy, and N. Phillips. 2002. “Institutional Effects of Interorganizational Collaboration: The Emergence of Proto-Institutions.” The Academy of Management Journal 45: 281–290. doi:10.5465/3069297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, E., G. Paolacci, and S. Puntoni. 2018. “Man versus Machine: Resisting Automation in Identity-Based Consumer Behavior.” Journal of Marketing Research 55 (6): 818–831. doi:10.1177/0022243718818423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, X., S. Tong, Z. Fang, and Z. Qu. 2019. “Frontiers: Machines vs. Humans: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Disclosure on Customer Purchases.” Marketing Science 38 (6): 937–947. doi:10.1287/mksc.2019.1192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makortoff, K. 2022. “‘Risks Posed by AI Are Real’: EU Moves to Beat the Algorithms That Ruin Lives.” The Guardian.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, D. M., and J. W. Schouten. 2014. “Consumption-Driven Market Emergence.” Journal of Consumer Research 40 (5): 855–870. doi:10.1086/673196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, P., D. Volland, F. Thiesse, and E. Fleisch. 2011. “User Acceptance of ‘Smart Products': An Empirical Investigation.” Wirtschaftsinformatik Proceedings 2011.
   Google Scholar
• McCracken, G. 1988. The Long Interview. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mende, M., M. L. Scott, J. van Doorn, D. Grewal, and I. Shanks. 2019. “Service Robots Rising: How Humanoid Robots Influence Service Experiences and Elicit Compensatory Consumer Responses.” Journal of Marketing Research 56 (4): 535–556. doi:10.1177/0022243718822827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mick, D. G., and S. Fournier. 1998. “Paradoxes of Technology: Consumer Cognizance, Emotions, and Coping Strategies.” Journal of Consumer Research 25 (2): 123–143. doi:10.1086/209531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteiro, P., and D. Nicolini. 2015. “Recovering Materiality in Institutional Work: Prizes as an Assemblage of Human and Material Entities.” Journal of Management Inquiry 24: 61–81. doi:10.1177/1056492614546221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, I. C., and S. Y. Wakenshaw. 2017. “The Internet-of-Things: Review and Research Directions.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 34 (1): 3–21. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nigam, A., and W. Ocasio. 2010. “Event Attention, Environmental Sensemaking, and Change in Institutional Logics: An Inductive Analysis of the Effects of Public Attention to Clinton's Health Care Reform Initiative.” Organization Science 21 (4): 823–841. doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, T. P., and D. L. Hoffman. 2019. “Relationship Journeys in the Internet of Things: A New Framework for Understanding Interactions between Consumers and Smart Objects.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 47 (2): 216–237. doi:10.1007/s11747-018-0608-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nysveen, H., P. E. Pedersen, and S. Skard. 2020. “Ecosystem Adoption of Practices Over Time (EAPT): Toward an Alternative View of Contemporary Technology Adoption.” Journal of Business Research 116: 542–551. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Leary, D. 2013. “‘Big Data’, the ‘Internet of Things’ and the ‘Internet of Signs’.” Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management 20: 53–65. doi:10.1002/isaf.1336.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W., and S. Barley. 2001. “Technology and Institutions: What Can Research on Information Technology and Research on Organizations Learn from Each Other?” MIS Quarterly 25: 145–165. doi:10.2307/3250927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahnke, E. C., R. Katila, and K. M. Eisenhardt. 2015. “Who Takes You to the Dance? How Partners’ Institutional Logics Influence Innovation in Young Firms.” Administrative Science Quarterly 60 (4): 596–633. doi:10.1177/0001839215592913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, J., J. Bettman, and E. Johnson. 1993. The Adaptive Decision Maker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pearl, R. 2019. New Study Blames Algorithm For Racial Discrimination, Ignores Physician Bias. Forbes.
   Google Scholar
• Pels, D. 1995. “Have We Never Been Modem? Towards a Demontage of Latour’s Modern Constitution.” History of the Human Sciences 8 (3): 129–141. doi:10.1177/095269519500800307.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., and J. A. Colyvas. 2008. “Microfoundations of Institutional Theory.” In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, and R. Suddaby, 276–298. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Puyou, F.-R., and P. Quattrone. 2018. “The Visual and Material Dimensions of Legitimacy: Accounting and the Search for Socie-ties.” Organization Studies 39 (5-6): 721–746. doi:10.1177/0170840618765013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raaijmakers, A., P. Vermeulen, and M. Meeus. 2018. “Children without Bruised Knees: Responding to Material and Ideational (Mis)Alignments.” Organization Studies 39 (5-6): 811–830. doi:10.1177/0170840617743298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raff, S., D. Wentzel, and N. Obwegeser. 2020. “Smart Products: Conceptual Review, Synthesis, and Research Directions.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 37 (5): 379–404. doi:10.1111/jpim.12544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raisamo, R., I. Rakkolainen, P. Majaranta, K. Salminen, J. Rantala, and A. Farooq. 2019. “Human Augmentation: Past, Present and Future.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 131: 131–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez Lopez, L. J., and A. I. Grijalba Castro. 2021. “Sustainability and Resilience in Smart City Planning: A Review.” Sustainability 13 (1): 181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, H., P. Monin, and R. Durand. 2003. “Institutional Change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle Cuisine as an Identity Movement in French Gastronomy.” American Journal of Sociology 108: 795–843. doi:10.1086/367917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reay, T., and C. Jones. 2016. “Qualitatively Capturing Institutional Logics.” Strategic Organization 14: 441–454. doi:10.1177/1476127015589981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, A. 2016. “Against Object Agency. A Counter Reaction to Sørensen's ‘Hammers and Nails.” Archaeological Dialogues 23 (2): 229–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijsdijk, S., and E. Hultink. 2009. “How Today’s Consumers Perceive Tomorrow’s Smart Products.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 26: 24–42. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00332.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijsdijk, S., E. Hultink, and A. Diamantopoulos. 2007. “Product Intelligence: Its Conceptualization, Measurement and Impact on Consumer Satisfaction.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 35: 340–356. doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0040-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayes, E. 2014. “Actor–Network Theory and Methodology: Just What Does It Mean to Say That Nonhumans Have Agency?” Social Studies of Science 44 (1): 134–149. doi:10.1177/0306312713511867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneiberg, M., and M. Lounsbury. 2008. “Social Movements and Institutional Analysis.” In SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, and K. Sahlin-Anderson, 648–670. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, F., R. Belk, W. Jordan, and M. Ortner. 2019. “Servant, Friend or Master? The Relationships Users Build with Voice-Controlled Smart Devices.” Journal of Marketing Management 35 (7-8): 693–715. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2019.1596970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, R. 2014. Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sharon, T. 2017. “Self-Tracking for Health and the Quantified Self: Re-Articulating Autonomy, Solidarity, and Authenticity in an Age of Personalized Healthcare.” Philosophy & Technology 30 (1): 93–121. doi:10.1007/s13347-016-0215-5.
   Google Scholar
• Shipilov, A., H. Greve, and R. Rowley. 2010. “When Do Interlocks Matter? Institutional Logics and the Diffusion of Multiple Corporate Governance Practices.” Academy of Management Journal 53: 846–864. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.52814614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slimane, K. B., D. Chaney, A. Humphreys, and B. Leca. 2019. “Bringing Institutional Theory to Marketing: Taking Stock and Future Research Directions.” Journal of Business Research 105: 389–394. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smets, M., T. Morris, and R. Greenwood. 2012. “From Practice to Field: A Multilevel Model of Practice-Driven Institutional Change.” Academy of Management Journal 55: 877–904. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spicer, A., and G. Sewell. 2010. “From National Service to Global Player: Transforming the Organizational Logic of a Public Broadcaster.” Journal of Management Studies 47 (6): 913–943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, J., and Z. Spire. 2020. “The Role of Informal Conversations in Generating Data, and the Ethical and Methodological Issues They Raise.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 21 (1): Art. 10. doi:10.17169/fqs-21.1.3344.
   Google Scholar
• Swedberg, R. 2005. The Max Weber Dictionary: Key Words and Central Concepts. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. 1982. “Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations.” Annual Review of Psychology 33: 1–39. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. 2004. Markets from Culture: Institutional Logics and Organizational Decisions in Higher Education Publishing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., C. Jones, and K. Kury. 2005. “Institutional Logics and Institutional Change in Organizations: Transformation in Accounting, Architecture, and Publishing.” In Transformation in Cultural Industries, edited by C. Jones and P. H. Thornton, 125–170. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., and W. Ocasio. 1999. “Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations: Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry.” American Journal of Sociology 105 (3): 801–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, P., and W. Ocasio. 2008. “Institutional Logics.” In SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, and K. Sahlin-Anderson, 99–129. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P., W. Ocasio, and M. Lounsbury. 2012. The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weise, K. 2018. “Hey, Alexa, Why Is Amazon Making a Microwave.” The New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Weiser, M. 1991. “The Computer for the 21st Century.” Scientific American 265: 94–104. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0991-94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, S. M. 2019. “Data Capitalism: Redefining the Logics of Surveillance and Privacy.” Business & Society 58 (1): 20–41. doi:10.1177/0007650317718185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, H. S. 2018. “Asking More of Siri and Alexa: Feminine Persona in Service of Surveillance Capitalism.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 35 (4): 334–349. doi:10.1080/15295036.2018.1488082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, H., H. Lee, and H. Zo. 2017. “User Acceptance of Smart Home Services: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior.” Industrial Management & Data Systems 117: 68–89. doi:10.1108/IMDS-01-2016-0017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanette, M. C., and D. Scaraboto. 2019. ““To Spanx or Not to Spanx”: How Objects That Carry Contradictory Institutional Logics Trigger Identity Conflict for Consumers.” Journal of Business Research 105: 443–453. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zilber, T. 2002. “Institutionalization as an Interplay Between Actions, Meanings, and Actors: The Case of a Rape Crisis Center in Israel.” Academy of Management Journal 45: 234–254. doi:10.2307/3069294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zilber, T. B. 2016. “How Institutional Logics Matter: A Bottom-up Exploration.” In How Institutions Matter!, edited by J. Gehman, M. Lounsbury, and R. Greenwood, 137–155. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. London: Profile Books.
   Google Scholar