Bodies as machines. Machines as bodies

References

• Abbate, Tindara, Marilena Vecco, Carlo Vermiglio, Vincenzo Zarone, and Mirko Perano. 2022. “Blockchain and Art Market: Resistance or Adoption?” Consumption Markets & Culture 25: 105–123. doi:10.1080/10253866.2021.2019026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Airoldi, Massimo, and Joonas Rokka. 2022. “Algorithmic Consumer Culture.” Consumption Markets & Culture 25: 411–428. doi:10.1080/10253866.2022.2084726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcaraz, Aleksandra Łukaszewicz. 2019. Cyborg Persons or Selves. Poland: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Malarstwa i Nowych Medi w Akademii Sztuki w Szczecinie.
   Google Scholar
• Alcaraz, Aleksandra Łukaszewicz. 2021. Are Cyborgs Persons?, Cyborg Persons or Selves. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Anders, Günther. 1980. “The Obsolescence of Man: On the Destruction of Life in the Epoch of the Third Industrial Revolution.” II.
   Google Scholar
• Bajde, Domen. 2013. “Consumer Culture Theory (Re)visits Actor–Network Theory.” Marketing Theory 13 (2): 227–242. doi:10.1177/1470593113477887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, David. 2016. Metric Power. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Belk, Russell W. 1988. “Possessions and the Extended Self.” Journal of Consumer Research 15 (2): 139–168. doi:10.1086/209154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, Russell W. 1992. “Me and Thee Versus Mine and Thine: How Perceptions of the Body Influence Organ Donation and Transplantation.” In Organ Donation and Transplantation: Psychological and Behavioral Factors, edited by J. Shanteau, and R. J. Harris, 139–149. Washington: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Belk, Russell W. 2013. “Extended Self in a Digital World: Table 1..” Journal of Consumer Research 40 (3): 477–500. doi:10.1086/671052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, Russell W. 2014. “If You Prick us Do We Not Bleed? Humanoid Robots and Cyborgs as Consuming Subjects and Consumed Objects.” Advances in Consumer Research, Latin America, Duluth.
   Google Scholar
• Belk, Russell W. 2022. “Artificial Emotions and Love and Sex Doll Service Workers.” Journal of Service Research 25: 521–536. doi:10.1177/10946705211063692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, Russell, and Maria Kniazeva. 2018. “Morphing Anthropomorphism: An Update.” Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science 28 (3): 239–247. doi:10.1080/21639159.2018.1466659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, Daniel. 2014. Embodiment and Mechanization: Reciprocal Understandings of Body and Machine from the Renaissance to the Present. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bode, Matthias, and Dorthe Brogård Kristensen. 2016. “The Digital Doppelgänger Within: A Study on Self Tracking and the Quantified Self Movement.” In Assembling Consumption: Researching Actors, Networks and Markets, edited by Robin Canniford, and Domen Bajde, 119–135. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bongard, Joshua, and Michael Levin. 2021. “Living Things Are Not (20th Century) Machines: Updating Mechanism Metaphors in Light of the Modern Science of Machine Behavior.” Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 9. doi:10.3389/fevo.2021.650726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borck, Cornelius. 2007. “Communicating the Modern Body: Fritz Kahn’s Popular Images of Human Physiology as an Industrialized World.” Canadian Journal of Communication 32 (2007): 495–520. doi:10.22230/cjc.2007v32n3a1876.
   Google Scholar
• Broderick, Alicia A., and Ari Ne’eman. 2008. “Autism as Metaphor: Narrative and Counter-Narrative.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 12 (5-6): 459–476. doi:10.1080/13603110802377490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caporael, L. R. 1986. “Anthropomorphism and Mechanomorphism: Two Faces of the Human Machine.” Computers in Human Behavior 2 (3): 215–234. doi:10.1016/0747-5632(86)90004-X.
   Google Scholar
• Carnot, Sadi. 2005. Reflections on the Motive Power of Fire: And Other Papers on the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Mineola: Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cascio, Jamais. 2007. “The Second Uncanny Valley.” In OpentheFuture.
   Google Scholar
• Castelo, Noah, Bernd Schmitt, and Miklos Sarvary. 2019. “Human or Robot? Consumer Responses to Radical Cognitive Enhancement Products.” Journal of the Association for Consumer Research 4 (3): 217–230. doi:10.1086/703462.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, S. 2009. “Should we Enhance Animals?” Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (11): 678–683. doi:10.1136/jme.2009.029512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cilia, Nicole Dalia, and Luca Tonetti. 2017. “Introduction.” In Wired Bodies: New Perspectives on the Machine-Organism Analogy, edited by Nicole Dalia Cilia, and Luca Tonetti, 13–26. Roma: CNR Edizioni.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Andy. 2004. Natural-Born Cyborgs: Minds, Technologies, and the Future of Human Intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clynes, M., and N. Kline. 1960. “Cyborgs and Space.” Astronautics (September): 26–75.
   Google Scholar
• Coffin, Jack. 2021. “Machines Driving Machines: Deleuze and Guattari’s Asignifying Unconscious.” Marketing Theory 21 (4): 501–516. doi:10.1177/14705931211035160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Leonora D. 1936. “Descartes and Henry More on the Beast-Machine—A Translation of Their Correspondence Pertaining to Animal Automatism.” Annals of Science 1 (1): 48–61. doi:10.1080/00033793600200051.
   Google Scholar
• DAIC. 2021. “First Woman in World Receives New Type of Artificial Heart.” DAIC. Accessed February 20, 2022. https://www.dicardiology.com/content/first-woman-world-receives-new-type-artificial-heart.
   Google Scholar
• Danforth, Scot, and Srikala Naraian. 2007. “Use of the Machine Metaphor Within Autism Research.” Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities 19 (3): 273–290. doi:10.1007/s10882-007-9061-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLanda, Manuel. 2002. Intensive Science and Virtual Philosophy. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• de Leeuw, Marc, and Sonja Van Wichelen. 2020. Personhood in the Age of Biolegality. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Descartes, Réne. 1999. Discourse on Method and Related Writings. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• DuFault, Beth Leavenworth, and John W. Schouten. 2020. “Self-quantification and the Datapreneurial Consumer Identity.” Consumption Markets & Culture 23 (3): 290–316. doi:10.1080/10253866.2018.1519489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrando, Francesca. 2019. Philosophical Posthumanism. London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
   Google Scholar
• Foerst, Anne. 2004. God in the Machine: What Robots Teach us About Humanity and God. New York: Dutton.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 2006. “Utopian Body.” In Sensorium: Embodied Experience, Technology, and Contemporary Art, edited by Caroline A. Jones, 229–234. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, Chris. 2004. The Archaeology of Personhood: An Anthropological Approach. Longon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, Steve. 2021. “Cyborg Persons: Humanity Played in a Different Key.” Postdigital Science and Education 3 (3): 668–677. doi:10.1007/s42438-020-00214-4.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, Shaun. 2013. “A Pattern Theory of Self.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7 (Jul): 1–7. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00443.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garber, Daniel. 2002. “Descartes Mechanics and the Mechanical Philosophy.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 26: 185–204. doi:10.1111/1475-4975.261061.
   Google Scholar
• Giesler, Markus. 2004. “Consuming Cyborgs: Researching Posthuman Consumer Culture.” Advances in Consumer Research, Valdosta.
   Google Scholar
• Gleyse, J., C. Pigeassou, A. Marcellini, E. De Léséleuc, and G. Bui-Xuân. 2010. “Physical Education as a Subject in France (School Curriculum, Policies and Discourse): The Body and the Metaphors of the Engine–Elements Used in the Analysis of a Power and Control System during the Second Industrial Revolution.” Sport, Education and Society 7 (1): 5–23. doi:10.1080/13573320120113549.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, Elaine. 2002. Representations of the Posthuman: Monsters, Aliens and Others in Popular Culture. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 2003. The Future of Human Nature. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hables-Gray, Chris, Heidi J. Figueroa-Sarriera, and Steven Mentor. 2021. Modified: Living as a Cyborg. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 1985. “A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s.” Socialist Review 80: 65–108.
   Google Scholar
• Haslam, Nick. 2006. “Dehumanization: An Integrative Review.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 10 (3): 252–264. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayles, N. Katherine. 1999. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, Martin. 1977. The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. New York: Harper Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten, Dorothea N. Aliman, Alina M. Herting, Gerrit P. Cziehso, Marc Linder, and Raoul V. Kübler. 2022. “Social Interactions in the Metaverse: Framework, Initial Evidence, and Research Roadmap.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. doi:10.1007/s11747-022-00908-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindi, Nir. 2020. “Shaping Business Minds Through Art.” In The Artian Podcast.
   Google Scholar
• Hirn, Gustave. 1862. Exposition Analytique et Expérimentale de la Théorie de la Chaleur. Paris: Mallet Bachelier.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, Donna L., and Thomas P. Novak. 2018. “Consumer and Object Experience in the Internet of Things: An Assemblage Theory Approach.” Journal of Consumer Research 44 (6): 1178–1204. doi:10.1093/jcr/ucx105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, Fritz. 1926. Das Leben des Menschen: Eine volkstümliche Anatomie, Biologie, Physiologie und ntwicklungsgeschichte des Menschen. Vol. 3. Stuttgart: Kosmos Franckh’sche Verlagshandlung.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, Robert V. 2008. “Technology/Ideology: How Ideological Fields Influence Consumers’ Technology Narratives.” Journal of Consumer Research 34 (6): 865–881. doi:10.1086/523289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinets, Robert V., Anthony Patterson, and Rachel Ashman. 2017. “Networks of Desire: How Technology Increases Our Passion to Consume.” Journal of Consumer Research 43 (5): 659–682. doi:10.1093/jcr/ucw061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurzweil, Ray. 2005. The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. London, UK: Penguin Group.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic.
   Google Scholar
• Lima, Vitor M., and Russel W. Belk. 2022. “Human Enhancement Technologies and the Future of Consumer Well-Being.” Journal of Services Marketing, 36: 885–894. doi:10.1108/JSM-09-2021-0363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima, Vitor M, Luís Alexandre Grubits de Paula Pessôa, and Russell W. Belk. 2022. “The Promethean Biohacker: On Consumer Biohacking as a Labour of Love.” Journal of Marketing Management 38 (5-6): 483–514. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2022.2070239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodewick, Colin. 2022. “Google’s Suspended AI Engineer Corrects the Record: He Didn’t Hire an Attorney for the ‘Sentient’ Chatbot, he Just Made Introductions — the Bot Hired the Lawyer.” Fortune. Accessed July 28. https://fortune.com/2022/06/23/google-blade-lemoine-ai-lamda-wired-attorney/.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, Deborah. 1995. “The Embodied Computer/User.” In Cyberspace/Cyberbodies/Cyberpunk: Cultures of Technological Embodiment, edited by Mike Featherstone, and Roger Burrows, 97–113. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, Calvin, and Tracy J. Trothen. 2021. Religion and the Technological Future: An Introduction to Biohacking, Artificial Intelligence, and Transhumanism. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mick, David Glen, and Susan Fournier. 1998. “Paradoxes of Technology: Consumer Cognizance, Emotions, and Coping Strategies.” Journal of Consumer Research 25 (September): 123–143. doi:10.1086/209531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori, Masahiro. 1970. “The Uncanny Valley.” Energy 7 (4): 33–35.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Christopher John. 2016. Prometheanism: Technology, Digital Culture and Human Obsolescence. London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Müllner, Rudolf. 2014. “Discourses on the Production of the Athletic Lean Body in Central Europe Around 1900.” The International Journal of the History of Sport 31 (15): 1896–1908. doi:10.1080/09523367.2014.913238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, Thomas P., and Donna L. Hoffman. 2022. “Automation Assemblages in the Internet of Things: Discovering Qualitative Practices at the Boundaries of Quantitative Change.” Journal of Consumer Research 49: 811–837. doi:10.1093/jcr/ucac014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantzar, Mika, and Minna Ruckenstein. 2015. “The Heart of Everyday Analytics: Emotional, Material and Practical Extensions in Self-Tracking Market.” Consumption Markets & Culture 18 (1): 92–109. doi:10.1080/10253866.2014.899213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papanelopoulou, Faidra. 2006. “Gustave-Adolphe Hirn (1815–90): Engineering Thermodynamics in Mid-Nineteenth-Century France.” The British Journal for the History of Science 39 (2): 231–254. doi:10.1017/S0007087406007989.
   Google Scholar
• Pelegrín-Borondo, Jorge, Mario Arias-Oliva, Kiyoshi Murata, and Mar Souto-Romero. 2020. “Does Ethical Judgment Determine the Decision to Become a Cyborg?” Journal of Business Ethics 161 (1): 5–17. doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3970-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preece, Chloe, Laryssa Whittaker, and Stephanie Janes. 2022. “Choose Your Own Future: The Sociotechnical Imaginaries of Virtual Reality.” Journal of Marketing Management 38 (15-16): 1777–1795. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2022.2112610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puntoni, Stefano, Rebecca Walker Reczek, Markus Giesler, and Simona Botti. 2021. “Consumers and Artificial Intelligence: An Experiential Perspective.” Journal of Marketing 85 (1): 131–151. doi:10.1177/0022242920953847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riskin, Jessica. 2010. “Machines in the Garden.” Republics of Letters 1 (2). Accessed May 2, 2022. http://arcade.stanford.edu/rofl/atificial-menalchemy-transubstantiation-and-homunculus.
   Google Scholar
• Robert-Demontrond, Philippe. 2022. “Contributions of Post-Phenomenology to the Study of the Consumption of Technical Objects: Principles and Applicative Perspectives – Illustrated by the Case of Self-Tracking.” Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition) 37 (4): 99–121. doi:10.1177/20515707221138413.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, Thomas Derek, and Eric Arnould. 2020. “Portable Technology and Multi-Domain Energy Practices.” Marketing Theory 20 (1): 3–22. doi:10.1177/1470593119870226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rorty, Amélie. 1976. “A Literary Postscript: Characters, Persons, Selves, Individuals.” In The Identities of Persons, edited by Amélie Rorty, 301–323. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roux, Dominique, and Russell W. Belk. 2019. “The Body as (Another) Place: Producing Embodied Heterotopias Through Tattooing.” Journal of Consumer Research 46 (3): 483–507. doi:10.1093/jcr/ucy081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rust, Roland, and Ming-Hui Huang. 2021. The Feeling Economy: How Artificial Intelligence is Creating the Era of Empathy. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schaffer, Simon. 1999. “Enlightened Automata.” In The Sciences in Enlightened Europe, edited by William Clark, Jan Golinski, and Simon Schaffer, 127–165. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, Bernd. 2019. “From Atoms to Bits and Back: A Research Curation on Digital Technology and Agenda for Future Research.” Journal of Consumer Research 46 (4): 825–832. doi:10.1093/jcr/ucz038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, Bernd. 2020. “Speciesism: An Obstacle to AI and Robot Adoption.” Marketing Letters 31 (1): 3–6. doi:10.1007/s11002-019-09499-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott-Morgan, Peter. 2021. Peter 2.0 – The Human Cyborg. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, Rebecca, Julien Cayla, and Bernard Cova. 2017. “Selling Pain to the Saturated Self.” Journal of Consumer Research 44 (1): 22–43. doi:10.1093/jcr/ucw071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seltzer, Mark. 1992. Bodies and Machines. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sherry, John F. 2000. “Place, Technology, and Representation.” Journal of Consumer Research 27 (2): 273–278. doi:10.1086/314325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelarc. 2008. “Stelarc.” Accessed March 18. http://stelarc.org/projects.php.
   Google Scholar
• Synnott, Anthony. 1992. “Tomb, Temple, Machine and Self: The Social Construction of the Body.” The British Journal of Sociology 43 (1): 79–110. doi:10.2307/591202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takhar, Jennifer, H. Rika Houston, and Nikhilesh Dholakia. 2022. “Live Very Long and Prosper? Transhumanist Visions and Ambitions in 2021 and Beyond … .” Journal of Marketing Management 38 (5-6): 399–422. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2022.2069953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takhar, Jennifer, and Kelly Pemberton. 2018. “Reproducing “Rhetrickery” in Online Fertility Marketing: Harnessing the ‘Rhetoric of the Possible’.” Consumption Markets & Culture 22 (4): 314–336. doi:10.1080/10253866.2018.1512239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoms, Ulrike. 2009. “Physical Reproduction, Eating Culture and Communication at the Workplace. The Case of Industrial Canteens in Germany 1850–1950.” Food and History 7 (2): 119–153. doi:10.1484/J.FOOD.1.100653.
   Google Scholar
• Tomas, David. 1995. “Feedback and Cybernetics: Reimaging the Body in the Age of the Cyborg.” Body & Society 1 (3-4): 21–43. doi:10.1177/1357034X95001003002.
   Google Scholar
• Vita-More, Natasha. 2021. “The Body Vehicle: An Argument for Transhuman Bodies.” In Modified: Living as a Cyborg, edited by Chris Hables Gray, Heidi J. Figueroa-Sarriera, and Steven Mentor, 34–44. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Warwick, Kevin. 2021. “Experiments with Cyborg Technology.” In Modified: Living as a Cyborg, edited by Chris Hables Gray, Heidi J. Figueroa-Sarriera, and Steven Mentor, 50–57. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weihrauch, Andrea, and Szu-Chi Huang. 2021. “Portraying Humans as Machines to Promote Health: Unintended Risks, Mechanisms, and Solutions.” Journal of Marketing 85 (3): 184–203. doi:10.1177/0022242920974986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, Norbert. 1948. “Cybernetics.” Scientific American 179: 14–19. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1148-14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yao, C. G., and P. N. Martins. 2020. “Nanotechnology Applications in Transplantation Medicine.” Transplantation 104 (4): 682–693. doi:10.1097/TP.0000000000003032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar