Spatial variation of permittivity of an electrolyte solution in contact with a charged metal surface: a mini review

REFERENCES

• AdamsDJ. Theory of the dielectric constant of ice. Nature. 293(5832):447–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ArsovZ, RappoltM, GrdodolnikJ. 2009. Weakened hydrogen bonds in water confined between lipid bilayers: the existence of a long-range attractive hydration force. Chem Phys Chem. 10(9–10):1438–1441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BarberoG, EvangelistaLR, OliveroD. 2000. Asymmetric ionic adsorption and cell polarization in liquid crystals. J Appl Phys. 87(5):2646–2648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BazantMZ, KilicMS, StoreyB, AjdariA. 2009. Towards an understanding of induced-charge electrokinetics at large applied voltages in concentrated solutions. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 152(1–2):48–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BiesheuvelPM, van SoestbergenM. 2007. Counterion volume effects in mixed electrical double layers. J Coll Int Sci. 316(2):490–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BikermanJJ. 1942. Structure and capacity of the electrical double layer. Phil Mag. 33:384–397.
   Google Scholar
• BivasI. 2006. Electrostatic and mechanical properties of a flat lipid bilayer containing ionic lipids. Coll Surf A. 282–283(1):423–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BivasI, ErmakovYA. 2007. Elasticity and electrostatics of amphiphilic layers. In: Leitmannova LiuA, editor. Advances in planar lipid bilayers and liposomes. Vol. 5. Amsterdam: Elsevier. p. 313–343.
   Google Scholar
• BoothF. 1951. The dielectric constant of water and the saturation effect. J Chem Phys. 19(4):391–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BoulbitchA, GuttenbergZ, SackmannE. 2001. Kinetics of membrane adhesion mediated by ligand receptor interaction studied with a biomimetic system. Biophys J. 81(5):2743–2751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ButtHJ, GrafK, KapplM. 2003. Physics and chemistry of interfaces. 1st ed.Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• CevcG. 1990. Membrane electrostatics. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1031(3):311–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChapmanDL. 1913. A contribution to the theory of electrocapillarity. Philos Mag. 25(148):475–481.
   Google Scholar
• CoalsonRD, DuncanA. 1996. Statistical mechanics of a multipolar gas: a lattice field theory approach. J Phys Chem. 100(7):2612–2620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DillKA, BrombergS. 2003. Molecular driving forces. New York and London: Garland Science.
   Google Scholar
• DuttaM, SenguptaM. 1954. A theory of strong electrolytes in solution based on new statistics. Proc Natl Inst Scif India. 20:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• EigenM, WickeE. 1954. The thermodynamics of electrolytes at higher concentrations. J Phys Chem. 58(9):702–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EvansDF, WennerströmH. 1994. The colloidal domain: where physics, chemistry, biology, and technology meet, Advances in artificial engineering series. New York: Wiley-VHC.
   Google Scholar
• FranksF. 1972. Water. A comprehensive treatise. In: The physics and physical chemistry of water. Vol. 1. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• FreiseV. 1952. Zur Theorie der Diffusendoppelschicht. Z Elektrochem. 56:822–827.
   Google Scholar
• FröhlichH. 1964. Theory of dielectrics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• GongadzeE, IgličA. 2012. Decrease of permittivity of an electrolyte solution near a charged surface due to saturation and excluded volume effects. Bioelectrochemistry, 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2011.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GongadzeE, BohincK, van RienenU, Kralj-IgličV, IgličA. 2010. Spatial variation of permittivity near a charged membrane in contact with electrolyte solution. In: IgličA, editor. APLBL. Vol. 11. Amsterdam: Elsevier. p. 101–126.
   Google Scholar
• GongadzeE, van RienenU, Kralj-IgličV, IgličA. 2011a. Langevin Poisson–Boltzmann equation: point-like ions and water dipoles near charged membrane surface. Gen Physiol Biophys. 30(2):130–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GongadzeE, KabasoD, BauerS, SlivnikT, SchmukiP, van RienenU, IgličA. 2011b. Adhesion of osteoblasts to a nanorough titanium implant surface. Int J Nanomed. 6:1801–1816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GongadzeE, van RienenU, Kralj-IgličV, IgličA. 2011c. Generalized Stern models of an electric double layer considering the spatial variation of permittivity and finite size of ion in saturation regime. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 16(4):576–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GouyMG. 1910. Sur la constitution de la charge electrique a la surface d'un electrolyte. J Physique (France). 9(1):457–468.
   Google Scholar
• GrimleyTB. 1950. The contact between a solid and an electrolyte. Proc R Soc Lond A. 201(1064):40–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GrimleyTB, MottNF. 1947. The contact between a solid and a liquid electrolyte. Discuss Faraday Soc. 1:3–11.
   Google Scholar
• GruenDWR, MarčeljaS. 1983. Spatially varying polarization in water. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans. II. 79(2):225–242.
   Google Scholar
• HelmholtzH. 1879. Studien über elektrische Grenzschichten. Ann Phys. 7:337–382.
   Google Scholar
• HianikT, PassechnikVI. 1995. Bilayer lipid membranes: structure and mechanical properties. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. p. 138–157.
   Google Scholar
• HillTL. 1986. An introduction to statistical thermodynamics. New York: Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ibarra-ArmentaJG, Martin-MolinaA, Quesada-PerezM. 2009. Testing a modified model of the Poisson–Boltzmann theory that includes ion size effects through Monte Carlo simulations. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 11(2):309–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IgličA, Kralj-IgličV. 1994. Influence of finite size of ions on electrostatic properties of electric double layer. Electrotecnical Rev. 61(3):127–133.
   Google Scholar
• IgličA, GongadzeE, BohincK. 2010. Excluded volume effect and orientational ordering near charged surface in solution of ions and Langevin dipoles. Bioelectrochemistry. 79(2):223–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IsraelachviliJN, WennerströmH. 1996. Role of hydration and water structure in biological and colloidal interactions. Nature. 379(6562):219–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JacksonJD. 1999. Classical electrodynamics. New York: Wiley and Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• KabasoD, GongadzeE, PerutkováŠ, Kralj-IgličV, MatschegewskiC, BeckU, van RienenU, IgličA. 2011. Mechanics and electrostatics of the interactions between osteoblasts and titanium surface. Comput Meth Biomech Biomed Eng. 14(5):469–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KirkwoodJG. 1939. The dielectric polarization of polar liquids. J Chem Phys. 7(10):911–919.
   Google Scholar
• Kralj-IgličV, IgličA. 1996. A simple statistical mechanical approach to the free energy of the electric double layer including the excluded volume effect. J Phys II France. 6(4):477–491.
   Google Scholar
• LamperskiS, OuthwaiteCW. 2002. Volume term in the inhomogeneous Poisson–Boltzmann theory for high surface charge. Langmuir. 18(9):3423–3424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ManciuM, RuckensteinE. 2002. Lattice site exclusion effect on the double layer interaction. Langmuir. 18(13):5178–5185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ManciuM, RuckensteinE. 2004. The polarization model for hydration/double layer interactions: the role of the electrolyte ions. Adv Coll Int Sci. 112(1–3):109–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlinS. 1989. The electrostatic properties of membranes. Ann Rev Biophys Chem. 18:113–136.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• OghakiM, KizukiT, KatsuraM, YamashitaK. 2001. Manipulation of selective cell adhesion and growth by surface charges of electrically polarized hydroxyapatite. J Biomed Mater Res. 57(3):366–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OnsagerL. 1936. Electric moments of molecules in liquids. J Am Chem Soc. 58(8):1486–1493.
   Google Scholar
• OuthwaiteCW. 1976. A treatment of solvent effect in the potential theory of electrolyte solution. Mol Phys. 31(5):1345–1357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OuthwaiteCW. 1983. Towards a mean electrostatic potential treatment of an ion-dipole mixture or a dipolar system next to a plane wall. Mol Phys. 48(3):599–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SafranS. 1994. Statistical thermodynamics of surfaces, interfaces, and membranes. Reading (MA): Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• SmithIO, BaumannMJ, McCabeLR. 2004. Electrostatic interactions as a predictor for osteoblast attachment to biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res A. 70(3):436–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SternO. 1924. Zur Theorie der elektrolytischen Doppelschicht. Z Elektrochemie. 30:508–516.
   Google Scholar
• TengNC, NakamuraS, TakagiY, YamashitaY, OhgakiM, YamashitaK. 2000. A new approach to enhancement of bone formation by electrically polarized hydroxyapatite. J Dent Res. 80(10):1925–1929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TressetG. 2008. Generalized Poisson–Fermi formalism for investigating size correlation effects with multiple ions. Phys Rev E. 78(6):061506.
   Google Scholar
• TrizacE, RaimbaultJL. 1999. Long-range electrostatic interactions between like-charged colloids: steric and confinement effects. Phys Rev E. 60(6):6530–6533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WiegelFW, StratingP. 1993. Distribution of electrolytes with excluded volume around a charged DNA molecule. Mod Phys Lett B. 7(7):483–490.
   Google Scholar
• ZelkoJ, IgličA, Kralj-IgličV, KumarPBS. 2010. Effects of counterion size on the attraction between similarly charged surfaces. J Chem Phys. 133(20):204901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar