Evaluating a suitable level of model complexity for finite element analysis of the intact acetabulum

REFERENCES

• AndersonA, EllisB, WeissJ. 2007. Verification, validation and sensitivity studies in computational biomechanics. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng.10:171–184.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• AndersonA, PetersC, TuttleB, WeissJ. 2005. Subject-specific finite element model of the pelvis: development, validation and sensitivity studies. J Biomech Eng.127:364–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BergmannG, DeuretzbacherG, HellerM, GraichenF, RohlmannA, StraussJ, DudaGN. 2001. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities: including Hip98: data collection of hip joint loading on CD-ROM. J Biomech.34:859–871, ISBN 3980784800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DakinG, ArbelaezR, MolzIV, F, Alonso J, MannK, EberhardtA. 2001. Elastic and viscoelastic properties of the human pubic symphysis joint. J Biomech Eng.123:218–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DalstraM, HuiskesR. 1995. Load transfer across the pelvic bone. J Biomech.28:715–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DalstraM, HuiskesR, OdgaardA, Van ErningL. 1993. Mechanical and textural properties of pelvic trabecular bone. J Biomech.26:523–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DanielM, IglicA, Kralj-IglicV. 2005. The shape of acetabular cartilage optimizes hip contact stress distribution. J Anat.207:85–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DarFH, MeakinJR, AspdenRM. 2002. Statistical methods in finite element analysis. J Biomech.35:1155–1161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DaysalGA, GokerB, GonenE, DemiragMD, HaznedarogluS, OzturkMA, BlockJA. 2007. The relationship between hip joint space width, center edge angle and acetabular depth. Osteoarthr Cartilage. 15:1446–1451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delp S. 1990. Surgery simulation: a computer graphics system to analyze and design musculoskeletal reconstructions of the lower limb. PhD, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Dopico-GonzálezC, NewAM, BrowneM. 2009. Probabilistic finite element analysis of the uncemented hip replacement – effect of femur characteristics and implant design geometry. J Biomech.43:512–520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duda GN. 1996. Influence of muscle forces on the internal loading of the femur during gait [PhD Thesis]. Technische Universitat Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• GoelV, ValliappanS, SvenssonN. 1978. Stresses in the normal pelvis. Comput Biol Med.8:91–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GrayH. 2004. Gray's anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. London: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• HellerMO, BergmannG, DeuretzbacherG, DurselenL, PohlM, ClaesL, HaasNP, DudaGN. 2001. Musculo-skeletal loading conditions at the hip during walking and stair climbing. J Biomech.34:883–893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HsuJ, LaiK, ChenQ, ZobitzM, HuangH, AnK, ChangC. 2006. The relation between micromotion and screw fixation in acetabular cup. Comput Methods Prog Biomed.84:34–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JanssenD, StolkJ, VerdonschotN. 2006. Finite element analysis of the long-term fixation strength of cemented ceramic cups. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med.220:533–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KaminskyJ, RodtT, GharabaghiA, ForsterJ, BrandG, SamiiM. 2005. A universal algorithm for an improved finite element mesh generation. Med Eng Phys.27:383–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KeyakJH, MeagherJM, SkinnerHB, MoteJCD. 1990. Automated three-dimensional finite element modelling of bone: a new method. J Biomed Eng.12:389–397.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KingstonB. 2000. Understanding joints: a practical guide to their structure and function. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• KluessD, SouffrantR, MittelmeierW, WreeA, SchmitzK-P, BaderR. 2009. A convenient approach for finite-element-analyses of orthopaedic implants in bone contact: modeling and experimental validation. Comput Methods Prog Biomed.95:23–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LazPJ, BrowneM. 2010. A review of probabilistic analysis in orthopaedic biomechanics. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med.224:927–943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MajumderS, RoychowdhuryA, PalS. 2007. Simulation of hip fracture in sideways fall using a 3D finite element model of pelvis-femur-soft tissue complex with simplified representation of whole body. Med Eng Phys.29:1167–1178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MantellS, ChandaH, BechtoldJ, KyleR. 1998. A parametric study of acetabular cup design variables using finite element analysis and statistical design of experiments. J Biomech Eng.120:667–675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MburuG. 1999. Optimizing the configuration of cement keyholes for acetabular fixation in total hip replacement using Taguchi experimental design. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf.213:485–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MurthaPE, HafezMA, JaramazB, DigioiaAM. 2008. Variations in acetabular anatomy with reference to total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 90-B:308–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OonishiH, IshaH, HasegawaT. 1983. Mechanical analysis of the human pelvis and its application to the artificial hip joint – by means of the three dimensional finite element method. J Biomech.16:427–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PhillipsA, PankajP, HowieC, UsmaniA, SimpsonA. 2007. Finite element modelling of the pelvis: inclusion of muscular and ligamentous boundary conditions. Med Eng Phys.29:739–748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RadcliffeIAJ, PrescottP, ManHS, TaylorM. 2007. Determination of suitable sample sizes for multi-patient based finite element studies. Med Eng Phys.29:1065–1072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RadcliffeIAJ, TaylorM. 2007. Investigation into the effect of varus-valgus orientation on load transfer in the resurfaced femoral head: a multi-femur finite element analysis. Clin Biomech.22:780–786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShepherdD, SeedhomB.1999a. The ‘instantaneous’ compressive modulus of human articular cartilage in joints of the lower limb. Rhematology38:124–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShepherdD, SeedhomB.1999b. Thickness of human articular cartilage in joints of the lower limb. Ann Rheum Dis.58:27–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShimVB, PittoRP, StreicherRM, HunterPJ, AndersonIA. 2007. The use of sparse CT datasets for auto-generating accurate FE models of the femur and pelvis. J Biomech.40:26–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SiggelkowE, HertigD, WidmerK-H, PloegH. 2004. Construction and validation of a finite element model of a human pelvis. CMBBE 2004. Madrid, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• SpearsI, PfleidererM, SchneiderE, HilleE, MorlockM. 2001. The effect of interfacial parameters on cup-bone relative micromotions. A finite element investigation. J Biomech.34:113–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StansfieldBW, NicolA, PaulJ, KellyI, GrayH, BergmannG. 2003. Direct comparison of calculated hip joint contact forces with those measured using instrumented implants. An evaluation of a three-dimensional mathematical model of the lower limb. J Biomech.36:929–936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TaddeiF, MartelliS, ReggianiB, CristofoliniL, VicecontiM. 2006. Finite-element modelling of bones from CT data: sensitivity to geometry and material uncertainties. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng.53:2194–2200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TaguchiG.1986. Introduction to quality engineering: designing quality into products and processes. Tokyo: Asian productivity Organization.
   Google Scholar
• TannastM, LanglotzU, SiebenrockKA, WieseM, BernsmannK, LanglotzF. 2005. Anatomic referencing of cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Related Res.436:144–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VicecontiM, AffatatoS, BaleaniM, BordiniB, CristofoliniL, TaddeiF. 2009. Pre-clinical validation of joint prostheses: a systematic approach. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater.2:120–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VicecontiM, BrusiG, PancantiA, CristofoliniL. 2006. Primary stability of an anatomical cementless hip stem: a statistical analysis. J Biomech.39:1169–1179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VicecontiM, DavinelliM, TaddeiF, CappelloA. 2004. Automatic generation of accurate subject specific bone finite element models to be used in clinical studies. J Biomech.37:1597–1605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhangQ-H, WangJ-Y, LuptonC, Heaton-AdegbileP, GuoZ-X, LiuQ, TongJ. 2010. A subject-specific pelvic bone model and its application to cemented acetabular replacements. J Biomech.43:2722–2727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhengN, WatsonL, Yong-HingK. 1997. Biomechanical modelling of the human sacroiliac joint. Med Biol Eng Comput.35:77–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar