Determination of expander apparatus displacements and contact pressures on the mucosa using FEM modelling considering mandibular asymmetries

REFERENCES

• BindoMJF, NakamaeAEM, SantosLB, IshikawaKH, GuarnieriTC, TamakiR. 2009. Study of the surface hardness and modulus of elasticity of conventional and microwave-cured acrylic resins. Braz Oral Res. 23(1):68–75.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BorchersL, ReichartP. 1983. Three-dimensional stress distribution around a dental implant at different stages of interface development. J Dent Res.62:155–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BoryorAN, GeigerM, HohmannA, WunderlichA, SanderC, SanderMF, SanderGF. 2008. Stress distribution and displacement analysis during an intermaxillary disjunction – a three-dimensional FEM study of a human skull. J Biomech. 41:376–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BoryorAN, HohmannaA, WunderlichA, GeigerM, KilicF, SanderM, SanderC, BöckersT, GünterFS. 2010. In-vitro results of rapid maxillary expansion on adults compared with finite element simulations. J Biomech. 43:1237–1242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BragaIMU, RochaDN, FilgueirasP, Las CasasEB, AndradeRM, JorgeRN, MartinsPALS. 2009. Biomechanical study of changes in buccal bone structure induced by expansion screw. In: Biodental engineering. Leiden: CRC Press/Balkema. p. 17–21.
   Google Scholar
• CattaneoPM, DalstraM, MelsenB. 2005. The finite element method: a tool to study orthodontic tooth movement. J Dent Res. 84(5):428–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CookSD, WeinsteinAM, KlawitterJJ. 1982. A three-dimensional finite element analysis of a porous rooted Co–Cr–Mo alloy dental implant. J Dent Res. 61:25–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CozzaP, BaccettiT, FranchiL, ToffolL, McNamaraJA. 2006. Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Classe II malocclusions: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 129(5):599.el–599.e12.
   Google Scholar
• EmrichRE, BrodieAG, BlayneyJR. 1965. Prevalence of Class I, Class II, and Class III malocclusions (angle) in a urban population. An epidemiological study. J Dent Res. 44(5):947–953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GengJP, TanKBC, LiuGR. 2001. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of literature. J Prosthet Dent. 85(6):585–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HaasAJ. 1970. Palatal expansion: just the beginning of the dentofacial orthopedics. Am J Orthod. 57(3):219–255.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HamulaW. 1993. Modified mandibular Schwarz appliance. J Clin Orthod. 27:89–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HartRT, HemebelVV, ThongpredaN, BuskirkWC, AndersonRC. 2006. Modeling the biomechanics of the mandible: a three-dimensional finite element study. J Biomech. 25:261–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HousleyJA, NandaRS, CurrierGF, McCuneDE. 2003. Stability of transverse expansion in the mandibular arch. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 124:184–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KatadaH, KatadaA, YasushigeI. 2005. Changes in orthodontic cephalometric reference points on application of orthopedic force to jaw: three-dimensional finite element analysis. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 46(3):59–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KawasakiK, TakayamaT, YamadaEK, NotamiE. 2001. Relationship between the stress distribution and the shape of the alveolar residual ridge-three-dimensional behavior of a lower complete denture. J Rehabil. 28:950–957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamaraJA, BrudonWL. 1993. Orthodontic and orthopedic treatment in mixed dentition. Ann Arbor, MI: Needham Press. p. 171–178.
   Google Scholar
• MiddletonJ, JonesM, WilsonA. 1996. The role of the periodontal ligament in bone modeling the initial development of a time-dependent finite element model. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 109:155–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miguel NetoAB, NishioC, MuchaJN. 2010. Agreement evaluation of a newly proposed system for malocclusion classification. Int J Odontostomat. 4(1):33–41.
   Google Scholar
• MotoyoshiM, HirabayashiM, ShimazakiT. 2002. An experimental study on mandibular expansion: increases in arch width and perimeter. Eur J Orthod. 24(2):125–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MotoyoshiM, ShiraiS, YanoS, NakanishiS. 2005. Permissible limits for mandibular expansion. Eur J Orthod. 27(2):115–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NordinM, FrankelVH. 1989. Biomechanics of bone (Chap. 1). In: NordinM, FrankelVH, editors. Basic biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system. 2nd ed.Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger. p. 323–325.
   Google Scholar
• OgiharaK, NakaharaR, KoyanagiS, SudaM. 1998. Treatment of a Brodie bite by lower lateral expansion: a case report and fourth year follow-up. J Clin Pediat Dent. 23:17–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• OréficeRL, PereiraMM, MansurHS. 2005. Biomateriais: Fundamentos e Aplicações. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Cultura Médica. p. 538.
   Google Scholar
• ÖzkayaN, NordinM. 1999. Fundamentals of biomechanics: equilibrium, motion, and deformation. 2nd ed.New York: Springer Verlag. p. 393–395.
   Google Scholar
• PerilloL, CanavaleR, FerroF, MasucciC, ChiodinniP, BaccettiT. 2010. Meta analisys of skeletal mandibular changes during Frankell appliance treatment. Eur J Orthod. 2:115–120.
   Google Scholar
• PhillipsRW. 1993. Materiais Dentários de Skinner. 9th ed.Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan. p. 123–124.
   Google Scholar
• ReitanK. 1960. Tissue behavior during orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod. 46:881–900.
   Google Scholar
• SandyJR, FardaleRW, MeikleMC. 1993. Recent advances in understanding mechanically induced bone remodeling and their relevance to orthodontic theory and practice. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 103(3):212–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchwarzAM. 1932. Tissue changes incidental to orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod. 18:331–352.
   Google Scholar
• ShengyiT, YinghuaX. 1991. Biomechanical properties and collagen fiber orientation of TMJ disks in dogs: part 2. Tensile mechanical properties of the disks. J Cranio Disord. 5:107–114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silva FilhoOGS, OzawaTO, OkadaCH, OkadaHY, DahmenL. 2007. Intentional ankylosis of the deciduous canines to enhance maxillary protaction. A prospective cephalometric analysis. Rev Dent Press Orthod Orthop Facial. 11(6):63–72.
   Google Scholar
• TauscheE, LuckO, HarzerW. 2004. Prevalence of malocclusions in the early mixed dentition and orthodontic treatment need. Euro J Orthod. 26(3):237–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TurnerCH, AnneV, PidapartiRMV. 1997. An uniform strain criterion for trabecular bone adaptation: do continuum-level strain gradients drive adaptation. J Biomech. 30:555–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WatabayashiN, OnaM, SuzukiT, IgarashiY. 2008. Nonlinear finite element analyses: advances and challenges in dental applications. J Dent. 36(7):463–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao-naL, Yun-kaiS, Zhen-ChunL, Chao-yingS, Xiao-dongC, Zhen-qunG, HongG, Xiao-taoC. 2008. Three-dimensional finite element analisys of a maxillary central incisor restored with different post-cone materials. Int Chin J Dent. 8:21–27.
   Google Scholar