A fluid–structure interaction-based numerical investigation on the evolution of stress, strength and rupture potential of an abdominal aortic aneurysm

REFERENCES

• BluesteinD, DumontK, De BeuleM, RicottaJ, ImpellizzeriP, VerheggheB, VerdonckP. 2008. Intraluminal thrombus and risk of rupture in patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysm-FSI modelling. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng.12:73–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DarlingRC, MessinaCR, BrewsterDC, OttingerLW. 1977. Autopsy study of unoperated abdominal aortic aneurysms. Circulation. 56:161–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FillingerMF, MarraSP, RaghavanML, KennedyFE. 2003. Prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: wall stress versus diameter. J Vasc Surg.37:724–732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GouefficY, BecqueminJP, DesgrangesP, KobeiterH. 2005. Midterm survival after endovascular versus open repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms. J Endovasc Ther.12:47–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GreenhalghRM. 2004. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (evar trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 364:843–848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KaminemiR, HeuserRR. 2004. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: a review of endoluminal treatment. J Intervent Cardiol.17:437–445.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LiJK. 1986. Comparative cardiac mechanics: Laplace's Law. J Theor Biol.118:339–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiZ, KleinstreuerC. 2005. Fluid–structure interaction effects on sac-blood pressure and wall stress in a stented abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Biomech Eng.127:662–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MaierA, GeeMW, ReepsC, PongratzJ, EcksteinHH, WallWA. 2010. A comparison of diameter, wall stress, and rupture potential index for abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk prediction. Ann Biomed Eng.38:3124–3134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MitaT, AritaT, MatsunagaN, FurukawaM, ZempoN, EsatoK, MatsuzakiM. 2000. Complications of endovascular repair for thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysm: an imaging spectrum. RadioGraphics. 20:1263–1278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MolonyDS, CallananA, MorrisLG, DoyleBJ, WalshMT, McGloughlinTM. 2008. Geometrical enhancements for abdominal aortic stentgrafts. J Endovasc Ther.15:518–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MolonyDS, CallananA, KavanaghEG, WalshMT, McGloughlinTM. 2009. Fluid–structure interaction of a patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with an endovascular stent-graft. Biomed Eng Online. 8:24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NewmanAB, ArnoldAM, BurkeGL, O'LearyDH, ManolioTA. 2001. Cardiovascular disease and mortality in older adults with small abdominal aortic aneurysms detected by ultrasonography. Ann Intern Med.134:182–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OkanoM, YoshidaY. 1994. Junction complexes of endothelial cells in atherosclerosis-prone and atherosclerosis-resistant regions on flow dividers of brachiocephalic bifurcations in the rabbit aorta. Biorheology. 31:155–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OurielK, GreenRM, DonayreC, ShortellCK, ElliottJ, DeWeeseJA. 1992. An evaluation of new methods of expressing aortic aneurysm size: relationship to rupture. J Vasc Surg.15:12–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PatelMI, HardmanDTA, FisherCM, ApplebergM. 1995. Current views on the pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Am Coll Surg.181:371–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RaghavanML, VorpDA. 2000. Toward a biomechanical tool to evaluate rupture potential of abdominal aortic aneurysm: identification of a finite strain constitutive model and evaluation of its applicability. J Biomech.33:475–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SalsacA-V, SparksSR, ChomazJ-M, LasherasJC. 2006. Evolution of the wall shear stresses during the progressive enlargement of symmetric abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Fluid Mech.560:19–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SheidaeiA, HunleySC, Zeinali-DavaraniS, RaguinLG, BaekS. 2011. Simulation of abdominal aortic aneurysm growth with updating hemodynamic loads using a realistic geometry. Med Eng Phys.33:80–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SzczerbaD, McgregorR, MuralidharK, SzékelyG. 2008. Mechanism and localization of wall failure during abdominal aortic aneurysm formation. Lecture Notes Comput Sci.5104:119–126.
   Google Scholar
• TimpermanPE, TomsickTA, TewJM, Jr, van LoverenHR. 1995. Aneurysm formation after carotid occlusion. Am J Neuroradiol.16:329–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vande GeestJP, WangDH, WisniewskiSR, MakarounMS, VorpDA. 2006. Towards a noninvasive method for determination of patient-specific wall strength distribution in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng. 34:1098–1106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VolokhKY. 2010. Comparison of biomechanical failure criteria for abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Biomech.43:2032–2034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VorpDA. 2007. Biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Biomech.40:1887–1902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VorpDA, MandarinoM, WebsterMW, GorcsanJ. 1996. Potential influence of intraluminal thrombus on abdominal aortic aneurysm as assessed by a new non-invasive method. Cardiovasc Surg.4:732–739.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• VorpDA, RaghavanML, WebsterMW. 1998. Mechanical wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysm: influence of diameter and asymmetry. J Vasc Surg.27:632–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WangX, LiX. 2011a. Fluid–structure interaction based study on the physiological factors affecting the behaviors of stented and non-stented thoracic aortic aneurysms. J Biomech.44:2177–2184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WangX, LiX. 2011b. Computational simulation of aortic aneurysm using FSI method: influence of blood viscosity on aneurismal dynamic behaviors. Comp Biol Med.41:812–821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WattonPN, RabergerNB, HolzapfelGA, VentikosY. 2009. Coupling the hemodynamic environment to the evolution of cerebral aneurysms: computational framework and numerical examples. J Biomech Eng.131:101003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WoltersBJBM, RuttenMCM, SchurinkGWH, KoseU, de HartJ, van de VosseFN. 2005. A patient-specific computational model of fluid–structure in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Med Eng Phys.27:871–883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar