Three-dimensional numerical simulation of stress induced by different lengths of osseointegrated implants in the anterior maxilla

References

• AkagawaY, SatoY, TeixeiraER, ShindoiN, WadamotoM. 2003. A mimic osseointegrated implant model for three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 30:41–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlbrektssonT, BrånemarkPI, HanssonHA, LindströmJ. 1981. Osseointegrated titanium implants: requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand. 52:155–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BaggiL, CappelloniI, Di GirolamoM, MaceriF, VairoG. 2008. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 100:422–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BozkayaD, MuftuS, MuftuA. 2004. Evaluation of load transfer characteristics of five different implants in compact bone at different load levels by finite elements analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 92:523–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrånemarkPI, HanssonBO, AdellR, BreineU, LindströmJ, HallénO, OhmanA. 1977. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw: experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl. 16:1–132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CochranDL, MortonD, WeberHP. 2004. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding loading protocols for endosseous dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 19(Suppl.):109–113.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GengJP, TanKB, LiuGR. 2001. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 85:585–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HasanI, RahimiA, KeiligL, BrinkmannKT, BourauelC. 2011. Computational simulation of internal bone remodelling around dental implants: a sensitivity analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng, Mar 1:1. [Epub ahead of print].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HelkimoE, CarlssonGE, HelkimoM. 1976. Bite force and state of dentition. Acta Odontol Scand. 35:297–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HimmlováL, DostálováT, KácovskýA, KonvickováS. 2004. Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: a finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 91:20–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HuangHL, FuhLJ, KoCC, HsuJT, ChenCC. 2009. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 24:455–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KaoHC, GungYW, ChungTF, HsuML. 2008. The influence of abutment angulation on micromotion level for immediately loaded dental implants: a 3-D finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 23:623–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LekholmU, GunneJ, HenryP, HiguchiK, LindénU, BergströmC, van SteenbergheD. 1999. Survival of the Brånemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: a 10-year prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 14:639–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LumLB. 1991. A biomechanical rationale for the use of short implants. J Oral Implantol. 17:126–131.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McHorrisWH. 1982. The importance of anterior teeth. J Gnath. 1:19–36.
   Google Scholar
• MeyerU, VollmerD, RunteC, BourauelC, JoosU. 2001. Bone loading pattern around implants in average and atrophic edentulous maxillae: a finite-element analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 29:100–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MischCE. 1990. Density of bone: effect on treatment plans, surgical approach, healing, and progressive bone loading. Int J Oral Implantol. 6:23–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MischCE, SteigengaJ, BarbozaE, Misch-DietshF, CianciolaLJ, KazorC. 2006. Short dental implants in posterior partial edentulism: a multicenter retrospective 6-year case series study. J Periodontol. 77:1340–1347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PapavasiliouG, KamposioraP, BayneSC, FeltonDA. 1996. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution around single tooth implants as a function of bony support, prosthesis type, and loading during function. J Prosthet Dent. 76:633–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PetrieCS, WilliamsJL. 2005. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest: a three-dimensional finite-element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 16:486–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SaabXE, GriggsJA, PowersJM, EngelmeierRL. 2007. Effect of abutment angulation on the strain on the bone around an implant in the anterior maxilla: a finite element study. J Prosthet Dent. 97:85–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SatoY, WadamotoM, TsugaK, TeixeiraER. 1999. The effectiveness of element downsizing on a three-dimensional finite element model of bone trabeculae in implant biomechanics. J Oral Rehabil. 26:288–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SevimayM, TurhanF, KilicxarslanMA, EskitasciogluG. 2005. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown. J Prosthet Dent. 93:227–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TeixeiraER, SatoY, AkagawaY, ShindoiN. 1998. A comparative evaluation of mandibular finite element models with different lengths and elements for implant biomechanics. J Oral Rehabil. 25:299–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TepperG, HaasR, ZechnerW, KrachW, WatzekG. 2002. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of implant stability in the atrophic posterior maxilla: a mathematical study of the sinus floor augmentation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 13:657–665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van StadenRC, GuanH, LooYC. 2006. Application of the finite element method in dental implant research. Comput Meth Biomech Biomed Eng. 9:257–270.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar