A combined numerical and experimental technique for estimation of the forces and moments in the lumbar intervertebral disc

REFERENCES

• AdamsMA. 1995. Mechanical testing of the spine. An appraisal of methodology, results, and conclusions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 20(19):2151–2156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AdamsMA, FreemanBJ, MorrisonHP, NelsonIW, DolanP. 2000. Mechanical initiation of intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 25(13):1625–1636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ArjmandN, PlamondonA, Shirazi-AdlA, LariviereC, ParnianpourM. 2011. Predictive equations to estimate spinal loads in symmetric lifting tasks. J Biomech. 44(1):84–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DreischarfM, ZanderT, BergmannG, RohlmannA. 2010. A non-optimized follower load path may cause considerable intervertebral rotations. J Biomech. 43(13):2625–2628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GilbertsonLG, GoelVK, KongWZ, ClausenJD. 1995. Finite element methods in spine biomechanics research. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 23(5–6):411–473.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GoelVK, GilbertsonLG. 1995. Applications of the finite element method to thoracolumbar spinal research – Past, present, and future. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 20(15):1719–1727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GoelVK, KongW, HanJS, WeinsteinJN, GilbertsonLG, 1993A. 1993. combined finite element and optimization investigation of lumbar spine mechanics with and without muscles. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 18(11):1531–1541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GoelVK, MonroeBT, GilbertsonLG, BrinckmannP. 1995. Interlaminar shear stresses and laminae separation in a disc. Finite element analysis of the L3–L4 motion segment subjected to axial compressive loads. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 20(6):689–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GoelVK, RamirezSA, KongW, GilbertsonLG. 1995. Cancellous bone Young's modulus variation within the vertebral body of a ligamentous lumbar spine – Application of bone adaptive remodeling concepts. J Biomech Eng. 117(3):266–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KozanekM, WangS, PassiasPG, XiaQ, LiG, BonoCM, WoodKB. 2009. Range of motion and orientation of the lumbar facet joints in vivo. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 34(19):E689–E696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiG, GillTJ, DeFrateLE, ZayontzS, GlattV, ZarinsB. 2002. Biomechanical consequences of PCL deficiency in the knee under simulated muscle loads – an in vitro experimental study. J Orthop Res. 20(4):887–892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiG, WangS, PassiasP, XiaQ, WoodK. 2009. Segmental in vivo vertebral motion during functional human lumbar spine activities. Eur Spine J. 18(7):1013–1021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiW, WangS, XiaQ, PassiasP, KozanekM, WoodK, LiG. 2011. Lumbar facet joint motion in patients with degenerative disc disease at affected and adjacent levels: an in vivo biomechanical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 36(10):E629–E637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MulhollandRC. 2008. The myth of lumbar instability: the importance of abnormal loading as a cause of low back pain. Eur Spine J. 17(5):619–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NachemsonAL. 1981. Disc pressure measurements. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 6(1):93–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NatarajanRN, AnderssonGB. 1999. The influence of lumbar disc height and cross-sectional area on the mechanical response of the disc to physiologic loading. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 24(18):1873–1881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NatarajanRN, WilliamsJR, AnderssonGB. 2006. Modeling changes in intervertebral disc mechanics with degeneration. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 88(Suppl 2):36–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PassiasPG, WangS, KozanekM, XiaQ, LiW, GrottkauB, WoodKB, LiG. 2011. Segmental lumbar rotation in patients with discogenic low back pain during functional weight-bearing activities. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 93(1):29–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PolgaDJ, BeaubienBP, KallemeierPM, SchellhasKP, LewWD, ButtermannGR, WoodKB. 2004. Measurement of in vivo intradiscal pressure in healthy thoracic intervertebral discs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 29(12):1320–1324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PolikeitA, FergusonSJ, NolteLP, OrrTE. 2003. Factors influencing stresses in the lumbar spine after the insertion of intervertebral cages: finite element analysis. Eur Spine J. 12(4):413–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PopeMH. 1989. Biomechanics of the lumbar spine. Ann Med. 21(5):347–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RennerSM, NatarajanRN, PatwardhanAG, HaveyRM, VoronovLI, GuoBY, AnderssonGB, AnHS. 2007. Novel model to analyze the effect of a large compressive follower pre-load on range of motions in a lumbar spine. J Biomech. 40(6):1326–1332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RohlmannA, GraichenF, WeberU, BergmannG. 2000. 2000 Volvo Award winner in biomechanical studies: Monitoring in vivo implant loads with a telemeterized internal spinal fixation device. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 25(23):2981–2986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RohlmannA, NellerS, ClaesL, BergmannG, WilkeHJ. 2001. Influence of a follower load on intradiscal pressure and intersegmental rotation of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 26(24):E557–E561.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• RohlmannA, ZanderT, BergmannG. 2005. Effect of total disc replacement with ProDisc on intersegmental rotation of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 30(7):738–743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RohlmannA, ZanderT, SchmidtH, WilkeHJ, BergmannG. 2006. Analysis of the influence of disc degeneration on the mechanical behaviour of a lumbar motion segment using the finite element method. J Biomech. 39(13):2484–2490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RohlmannA, ZanderT, RaoM, BergmannG. 2009a. Realistic loading conditions for upper body bending. J Biomech. 42(7):884–890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RohlmannA, ZanderT, RaoM, BergmannG. 2009b. Applying a follower load delivers realistic results for simulating standing. J Biomech. 42(10):1520–1526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchmidtH, HeuerF, DrummJ, KlezlZ, ClaesL, WilkeHJ. 2007. Application of a calibration method provides more realistic results for a finite element model of a lumbar spinal segment. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 22(4):377–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchmidtH, Shirazi-AdlA, GalbuseraF, WilkeHJ. 2010. Response analysis of the lumbar spine during regular daily activities – A finite element analysis. J Biomech. 43(10):1849–1856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirazi-AdlA. 1994. Analysis of role of bone compliance on mechanics of a lumbar motion segment. J Biomech Eng. 116(4):408–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirazi-AdlSA, ShrivastavaSC, AhmedAM. 1984. Stress analysis of the lumbar disc-body unit in compression. A three-dimensional nonlinear finite element study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 9(2):120–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SmitTH, OdgaardA, SchneiderE. 1997. Structure and function of vertebral trabecular bone. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 22(24):2823–2833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StokesIA, IatridisJC. 2004. Mechanical conditions that accelerate intervertebral disc degeneration: overload versus immobilization. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 29(23):2724–2732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WangS, PassiasP, LiG, WoodK. 2008. Measurement of vertebral kinematics using noninvasive image matching method-validation and application. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 33(11):E355–E361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WangS, XiaQ, PassiasP, WoodK, LiG. 2009. Measurement of geometric deformation of lumbar intervertebral discs under in-vivo weightbearing condition. J Biomech. 42(6):705–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WangS, XiaQ, PassiasP, LiW, WoodK, LiG. 2011. How does lumbar degenerative disc disease affect the disc deformation at the cephalic levels in vivo?Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 36(9):E574–E581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WilkeHJ, NeefP, CaimiM, HooglandT, ClaesLE. 1999. New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 24(8):755–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WilkeHJ, RohlmannA, NellerS, SchultheissM, BergmannG, GraichenF, ClaesLE. 2001. Is it possible to simulate physiologic loading conditions by applying pure moments? A comparison of in vivo and in vitro load components in an internal fixator. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 26(6):636–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• XiaQ, WangS, PassiasPG, KozanekM, LiG, GrottkauBE, WoodKB. 2009. In vivo range of motion of the lumbar spinous processes. Eur Spine J. 18(9):1355–1362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• XiaQ, WangS, KozanekM, PassiasP, WoodK, LiG. 2010. In-vivo motion characteristics of lumbar vertebrae in sagittal and transverse planes. J Biomech. 43(10):1905–1909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZanderT, RohlmannA, CalisseJ, BergmannG. 2001. Estimation of muscle forces in the lumbar spine during upper-body inclination. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 16(Suppl 1):S73–S80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZanderT, RohlmannA, BergmannG. 2009. Influence of different artificial disc kinematics on spine biomechanics. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 24(2):135–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar