Importance of diameter-to-length ratio in selecting dental implants: a methodological finite element study

References

• AbuhusseinH, PagniG, RebaudiA, WangH. 2010. The effect of thread pattern upon implant osseointegration. Clin Oral Implants Res. 21(2):129–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AnituaE, TapiaR, LuzuriagaF, OriveG. 2010. Influence of implant length, diameter, and geometry on stress distribution: a finite element analysis. Int J Period Rest Dent. 30(1):89–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BaggiL, CappelloniI, Di GirolamoM, MaceriF, VairoG. 2008. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 100(6):422–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BlackJ, HastingsG1998. Handbook of biomaterial properties. London: Chapman & Hall Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• BorchersL, ReichartP. 1983. Three-dimensional stress distribution around a dental implant at a different stages of interface development. J Dent Res. 62(2):155–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BozkayaD, MuftuS, MuftuA. 2004. Evaluation of load transfer characteristics of five different implants in compact bone at different load levels by finite elements analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 92(6):523–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BranemarkP-J, AdellR, BreineU, HanssonBO, LindstormI, OhlssonA. 1969. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. 1. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 3(2):81–100.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BrunskiJB. 1997. Biomechanics of dental implants. In: BlockM, KentJN, GuerraLR, editors. Implants in dentistry: essentials of endosseous implants for maxillofacial reconstruction. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders Co, 63–71.
   Google Scholar
• BursteinAH, ReillyDT, MartensM. 1976. Aging of bone tissue: mechanical properties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 58(1):82–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CaglarA, AydinC, OzenJ, YilmazC, KorkmazT. 2006. Effects of mesiodistal inclination of implants on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl. 21(1):36–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CarterDR, Van Der MeulenMC, BeaupreGS. 1996. Mechanical factors in bone growth and development. Bone. 18(1 Suppl.):5S–10S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CarterDR, HayesWC. 1997. The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 59(7):954–962.
   Google Scholar
• ChouHY, MuftuS, BozkayaD. 2010. Combined effects of implant insertion depth and alveolar bone quality on peri-implant bone strain induced by a wide-diameter long implant and a narrow-diameter long implant. J Prosthet Dent. 104(5):293–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChunHJ, CheongSY, HanJH, HeoSJ, ChungJP, RhyuIC, ChoiYC, BaikHK, KuH, KimMH. 2002. Evaluation of design parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 29(6):565–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChunHJ, ParkDN, HanCH, HeoSJ, HeoMS, KoakJY. 2005. Stress distribution in maxillary bone surrounding overdenture implants with different overdenture attachments. J Oral Rehabil. 32(3):193–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DemenkoV, LinetskiyI, NesvitK, ShevchenkoA. 2011. Ultimate masticatory force as a criterion in implant selection. J Dent Res. 90(10):1211–1215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GengJP, TanKBC, LuiGR. 2001. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of literature. J Prosthet Dent. 85(6):585–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GereGM, TimoshenkoSP. 1997. Mechanics of materials. 4th ed. Boston, MA: PWS Pub. Co.
   Google Scholar
• HimmlovaL, DostalovaT, KacovskyA, KonvickovaS. 2004. Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: a finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 9(1):20–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HolmesDC, LoftusLT. 1997. Influence of bone quality on stress distribution for endosseous implants. J Oral Implantol. 23(3):104–111.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HolmgrenEP, SeckingerRJ, KilgrenLM, ManteF. 1998. Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis – two dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction. J Oral Implantol. 24(2):80–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• IshigakiS, NakanoT, YamadaS, NakamuraT, TakashimaF. 2003. Biomechanical stress in bone surrounding an implant under simulated chewing. Clin Oral Implants Res. 14(1):97–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KayabasiO, YuzbasiogluE, ErzinkanliF. 2006. Static, dynamic and fatigue behaviors of dental implant using finite element method. Adv Eng Softw. 37:649–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LekholmU, ZarbA. 1985. Tissue-integrated prostheses. In: BranemarkP-J, ZarbGA, AlbrektssonT, editors. Tissue integrated prostheses. Chicago, IL: Quintessence Publishing. p. 199–209.
   Google Scholar
• LemonsJE, Dietsh-MischF. 1999. Biomaterials for dental implants. In: MischCE, editor. Contemporary implant dentistry. 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby. p. 271–302.
   Google Scholar
• MartinRB, BurrDB, SharkeyNA. 1998. Skeletal tissue mechanics. 1st ed. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• MeijerHJA, KuiperJH, StarmansFJM, BosmanF. 1992. Stress distribution around dental implants: influence of super-structure length of implants, and height of mandible. J Prosthet Dent. 68(1):96–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MeijerHJA, StarmansFJM, SteenWHA, BosmanF. 1993. A three-dimensional finite element analysis of the bone around dental implants in an edentulous human mandible. Arch Oral Biol. 38(6):491–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MenicucciG, MossolovA, MozzatiM, LorenzettiM, PretiG. 2002. Tooth-implant connection: some biomechanical aspects based on finite element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 13(3):334–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NataliAN, PavanPG. 2002. A comparative analysis based on different strength criteria for evaluation of risk factor for dental implants. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 5(2):127–133.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• PapavasiliouG, TripodakisAP, KamposioraP, StrubJR, BayneSC. 1996. Finite element analysis of ceramic abutment-restoration combinations for osseointegrated implants. Int J Prosthodont. 9(3):254–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PerezMA, Prados-FrutosJC, BeaJA, DoblareM. 2010. Stress transfer properties of different commercial dental implants: a finite element study. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 17:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• PetrieCS, WilliamsJL. 2005. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 16(4):486–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PierrisnardL, RenouardF, RenaultP, BarquinsM. 2003. Influence of implant length and bicortical anchorage on implant stress distribution. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 5(5):254–262.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• RiegerMR. 1988. Finite element stress analysis of root-form implants. J Oral Implantol. 14(4):472–484.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• RiegerMR, AdamsWK, KinzelGL, BroseMO. 1989. Finite element analysis of bone-adapted and bone-bonded endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent. 62(4):436–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roos-JansakerAM, LindahlC, RenvertH, RenvertS. 2006. Nine-to fourteen-year follow up of implant treatment. Part 1: implant loss and associations to various factors. J Clin Periodontol. 33(4):283–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SahinS, CehreliMC, YalcinE. 2002. The influence of functional forces on the biomechanics of implant-supported prostheses – a review. J Dent. 30(7–8):271–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SatoY, WadamotoM, TsugaK, TeixeiraER. 1999. The effectiveness of element downsizing on a three-dimensional finite element model of bone trabeculae in implant biomechanics. J Oral Rehabil. 26(4):288–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SevimayM, TurbanF, KilicarslanMA, EskifasciogluG. 2005. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress-distribution in an implant-supported crown. J Prosthet Dent. 93(3):227–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SiegeleD, SolteszU. 1989. Numerical investigations of the influence of implant shape on stress distribution in the jaw bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 4(4):333–340.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• TadaS, StegaroiuR, KitamuraE, MiyakawaO, KusakariH. 2003. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 18(3):357–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van OosterwyckH, DuyckJ, Van der SlotenJ, Van der PerreG, De CoomanM, LievensS, PuersR, NaertI. 1998. The influence of bone mechanical properties and implant fixation upon bone loading around oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 9(6):407–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van StadenRC, GuanH, LooYC. 2006. Application of the finite element method in dental implant research. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 9(4):257–270.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van StadenRC, GuanH, LooYC, JohnsonNW, MeredithN. 2007. Stress distribution in mandible regulated by bone and dental implant parameters. Part I: methodology [online]. In: VeidtM, editor. Proceedings of the 5th Australasian Congress on Applied Mechanics. Brisbane, QLD, Australia. p. 818–823.
   Google Scholar
• WatzekG. 1996. Endosseous implants: scientific and clinical aspects. Chicago, IL: Quintessence Publishing. p. 291–317.
   Google Scholar
• YamadaH. 1970. Strength of biological materials. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• ZienkiewiczOC, TaylorRL. 2005. The finite element method. 6th ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar