Mechanical performance of endodontic restorations with prefabricated posts: sensitivity analysis of parameters with a 3D finite element model

REFERENCES

• AkkayanB, GulmezT. 2002. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent. 87(4):431–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• al-HazaimehN, GutteridgeDL. 2001. An in vitro study into the effect of the ferrule preparation on the fracture resistance of crowned teeth incorporating prefabricated post and composite core restorations. Int Endod J. 34(1):40–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-OmiriMK, Al-WahadniAM. 2006. An ex vivo study of the effects of retained coronal dentine on the strength of teeth restored with composite core and different post and core systems. Int Endod J. 39(11):890–899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AsmussenE, PeutzfeldtA, SahafiA. 2005. Finite element analysis of stresses in endodontically treated, dowel-restored teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 94(4):321–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BalboshA, KernM. 2006. Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass–fiber endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent. 95(3):218–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barjau-EscribanoA, Sancho-BruJL, Forner-NavarroL, Rodríguez-CervantesPJ, Pérez-GonzálezA, Sánchez-MarínFT. 2006. Influence of prefabricated post material on restored teeth: fracture strength and stress distribution. Oper Dent. 31(1):47–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BergeronBE, MurchisonDF, SchindlerWG, WalkerWA, III. 2001. Effect of ultrasonic vibration and various sealer and cement combinations on titanium post removal. J Endod. 27(1):13–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschian PestL, GuidottiS, PietrabissaR, GaglianiM. 2006. Stress distribution in a post-restored tooth using the three-dimensional finite element method. J Oral Rehabil. 33(9):690–697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BurnsDR, DouglasHB, MoonPC. 1993. Comparison of the retention of endodontic posts after preparation with EDTA. J Prosthet Dent. 69(3):262–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BursteinAH, ReillyDT, MartensM. 1976. Aging of bone tissue: mechanical properties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 58(1):82–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChanFW, HarcourtJK, BrockhurstPJ. 1993. The effect of post adaptation in the root canal on retention of posts cemented with various cements. Aust Dent J. 38(1):39–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChangWC, MillsteinPL. 1993. Effect of design of prefabricated post heads on core materials. J Prosthet Dent. 69(5):475–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChristensenRM. 2006. A comparative evaluation of three isotropic, two property failure theories. J Appl Mech. 73(5):852–859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChuangS, YamanP, HerreroA, DennisonJ, ChangC. 2010. Influence of post material and length on endodontically treated incisors: an in vitro and finite element study. J Prosthet Dent. 104(6):379–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CooneyJP, CaputoAA, TrabertKC. 1986. Retention and stress distribution of tapered-end endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent. 55(5):540–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CormierCJ, BurnsDR, MoonP. 2001. In vitro comparison of the fracture resistance and failure mode of fiber, ceramic, and conventional post systems at various stages of restoration. J Prosthodont. 10(1):26–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CraigRG, PowersJM. 2002. Restorative dental materials. St Louis, MO: Mosby.
   Google Scholar
• D'ArcangeloC, CinelliM, De AngelisF, D'AmarioM. 2007. The effect of resin cement film thickness on the pullout strength of a fiber-reinforced post system. J Prosthet Dent. 98(3):193–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DavyDT, DilleyGL, KrejciRF. 1981. Determination of stress patterns in root-filled teeth incorporating various dowel designs. J Dent Res. 60(7):1301–1310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De GrootR, PetersMC, De HaanYM, DopGJ, PlasschaertAJ. 1987. Failure stress criteria for composite resin. J Dent Res. 66(12):1748–1752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FeltonDA, WebbEL, KanoyBE, DugoniJ. 1991. Threaded endodontic dowels: effect of post design on incidence of root fracture. J Prosthet Dent. 65(2):179–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FerrariM, SorrentinoR, ZaroneF, ApicellaD, AversaR, ApicellaA. 2008. Non-linear viscoelastic finite element analysis of the effect of the length of glass fiber posts on the biomechanical behaviour of directly restored incisors and surrounding alveolar bone. Dent Mater. 27(4):485–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FriedmanCM, SandrikJL, HeuerMA, RappGW. 1975. Composition and mechanical properties of gutta-percha endodontic points. J Dent Res. 54(5):921–925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GalloJR, III, MillerT, XuX, BurgessJO. 2002. In vitro evaluation of the retention of composite fiber and stainless steel posts. J Prosthodont. 11(1):25–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GenoveseK, LambertiL, PappalettereC. 2005. Finite element analysis of a new customized composite post system for endodontically treated teeth. J Biomech. 38(12):2375–2389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-LluchC, Rodríguez-CervantesPJ, Sancho-BruJL, Pérez-GonzálezA, Barjau EscribanoA, Forner-NavarroL. 2011. Influence of post material and length on endodontically treated incisors with a considerably bone loss. Clin Oral Invest. 5:771–857.
   Google Scholar
• González-LluchC, Rodríguez-CervantesPJ, Sancho-BruJL, Pérez-GonzálezA, Barjau-EscribanoA, Vergara-MonederoM, Forner-NavarroL. 2009. Influence of material and diameter of pre-fabricated posts on maxillary central incisors restored with crown. J Oral Rehabil. 36(10):737–747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HaumanCH, ChandlerNP, PurtonDG. 2003. Factors influencing the removal of posts. Int Endod J. 36(10):687–690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HenriksenSS, DingM, Vinther JuhlM, TheilgaardN, OvergaardS. 2011. Mechanical strength of ceramic scaffolds reinforced with biopolymers is comparable to that of human bone. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 22(5):1111–1118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HsuML, ChenCS, ChenBJ, HuangHH, ChangCL. 2009. Effects of post materials and length on the stress distribution of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors: a 3D finite element analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 36(11):821–830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HuYH, PangLC, HsuCC, LauYH. 2003. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated anterior teeth restored with four post-and-core systems. Quintessence Int. 34(5):349–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IchimI, KuzmanovicDV, LoveRM. 2006. A finite element analysis of ferrule design on restoration resistance and distribution of stress within a root. Int Endod J. 39(6):443–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IsidorF, OdmanP, BrondumK. 1996. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using prefabricated carbon fiber posts. Int J Prosthodont. 9(2):131–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KomatsuK. 2010. Mechanical strength and viscoelastic response of the periodontal ligament in relation to structure. J Dent Biomech. 2010, 502318. Epub 2009 Dec 15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KurerHG, CombeEC, GrantAA. 1977. Factors influencing the retention of dowels. J Prosthet Dent. 38(5):515–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LanzaA, AversaR, RengoS, ApicellaD, ApicellaA. 2005. 3D FEA of cemented steel, glass and carbon posts in a maxillary incisor. Dent Mater. 21(8):709–715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MaceriF, MartignoniM, VairoG. 2009. Optimal mechanical design of anatomical post-systems for endodontic restoration. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 12(1):59–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-InsuaA, da SilvaL, RiloB, SantanaU. 1998. Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon-fiber post with a composite core. J Prosthet Dent. 80(5):527–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MendozaDB, EakleWS, KahlEA, HoR. 1997. Root reinforcement with a resin-bonded preformed post. J Prosthet Dent. 78(1):10–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MillerAW, III. 1982. Post and core systems: which one is best?J Prosthet Dent. 48(1):27–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MilotP, SteinRS. 1992. Root fracture in endodontically treated teeth related to post selection and crown design. J Prosthet Dent. 68(3):428–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MonticelliF. 2008. Cement system and surface treatment selection for fiber post luting. Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal. 13(3):214–221.
   Google Scholar
• NergizI, SchmageP, PlatzerU, McMullan-VogelCG. 1997. Effect of different surface textures on retentive strength of tapered posts. J Prosthet Dent. 78(5):451–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NissanJ, DmitryY, AssifD. 2001. The use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced post length. J Prosthet Dent. 86(3):304–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PegorettiA, FambriL, ZappiniG, BianchettiM. 2002. Finite element analysis of a glass fibre reinforced composite endodontic post. Biomaterials. 23(13):2667–2682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-GonzálezA, Gonzalez-LluchC, Sancho-BruJL, Rodriguez-CervantesPJ, Barjau-EscribanoA, Forner-NavarroL. 2012. Experimental strength of restorations with fibre posts at different stages, with and without using a simulated ligament. J Oral Rehabil. 39(3):188–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-GonzálezA, Iserte-VilarJL, González-LluchC. 2011. Interpreting finite element results for brittle materials in endodontic restorations. Biomed Eng Online. 10:44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PlotinoG, GrandeNM, BediniR, PameijerCH, SommaF. 2007. Flexural properties of endodontic posts and human root dentin. Dent Mater. 23:1129–1135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PowersJM, SkaguchiRL. 2006. Craig's restorative dental materials. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
   Google Scholar
• PriscoD, De SantisR, MollicaF, AmbrosioL, RengoS, NicolaisL. 2003. Fiber post adhesion to resin luting cements in the restoration of endodontically-treated teeth. Oper Dent. 28(5):515–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ProbsterL, Geis-GerstorferJ, KirchnerE, KanjantraP. 1997. In vitro evaluation of a glass-ceramic restorative material. J Oral Rehabil. 24(9):636–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RaygotCG, ChaiJ, JamesonDL. 2001. Fracture resistance and primary failure mode of endodontically treated teeth restored with a carbon fiber-reinforced resin post system in vitro. Int J Prosthodont. 14(2):141–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RobbinsJW. 1990. Guidelines for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth. J Am Dent Assoc. 120(5), 558, 560, 562 passim.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-CervantesPJ, Gonzalez-LluchC, Sancho-BruJL, Barjau-EscribanoA, Perez-GonzalezA, Forner-NavarroL. 2010. Effect of the material of the prefabricated post on restored premolars. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Biodental Engineering; 2009 June 26–27; Porto, Portugal, pp. 41–46.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-CervantesPJ, Sancho-BruJL, Barjau-EscribanoA, Forner-NavarroL, Pérez-GonzálezA, Sánchez-MarínFT. 2007. Influence of prefabricated post dimensions on restored maxillary central incisors. J Oral Rehabil. 34(2):141–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RuempingDR, LundMR, SchnellRJ. 1979. Retention of dowels subjected to tensile and torsional forces. J Prosthet Dent. 41(2):159–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SahafiA, PeutzfeldtA, RavnholtG, AsmussenE, GotfredsenK. 2005. Resistance to cyclic loading of teeth restored with posts. Clin Oral Investig. 9(2):84–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SaskalauskaiteE, TamLE, McCombD. 2008. Flexural strength, elastic modulus, and pH profile of self-etch resin luting cements. J Prosthodont. 17(4):262–268.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SidoliGE, KingPA, SetchellDJ. 1997. An in vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber-based post and core system. J Prosthet Dent. 78(1):5–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SorrentinoR, ApicellaD, RiccioC, GherloneE, ZaroneF, AversaR, Garcia-GodoyF, FerrariM, ApicellaA. 2009. Nonlinear visco-elastic finite element analysis of different porcelain veneers configuration. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 91(2):727–736.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SorrentinoR, SalamehZ, ApicellaD, AuriemmaT, ZaroneF, ApicellaA, FerrariM. 2007. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress and strain distributions in post-and-core treated maxillary central incisors. J Adhes Dent. 9(6):527–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StandleeJP, CaputoAA. 1992. The retentive and stress distributing properties of split threaded endodontic dowels. J Prosthet Dent. 68(3):436–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StandleeJP, CaputoAA, CollardEW, PollackMH. 1972. Analysis of stress distribution by endodontic posts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 33(6):952–960.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• StandleeJP, CaputoAA, HansonEC. 1978. Retention of endodontic dowels: effects of cement, dowel length, diameter, and design. J Prosthet Dent. 39(4):400–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StankiewiczNR, WilsonPR. 2002. The ferrule effect: a literature review. Int Endod J. 35(7):575–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StocktonLW. 1999. Factors affecting retention of post systems: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 81(4):380–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UddanwadikerRV, PadolePM, AryaH. 2007. Effect of variation of root post in different layers of tooth: linear vs nonlinear finite element stress analysis. J Biosci Bioeng. 104(5):363–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YamanSD, KaracaerO, SahinM. 2004. Stress distribution of post-core applications in maxillary central incisors. J Biomater Appl. 18(3):163–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZalkindM, ShkuryS, SternN, HelingI. 2000. Effect of prefabricated metal post-head design on the retention of various core materials. J Oral Rehabil. 27(6):483–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar