Subject-specific bone remodelling of the scapula

REFERENCES

• AmbrósioJ, QuentalC, PilarczykB, FolgadoJ, MonteiroJ. 2011. Multibody biomechanical models of the upper limb. Procedia IUTAM. 2:4–17.
   Google Scholar
• BaggeM. 2000. A model of bone adaptation as an optimization process. J Biomech. 33(1):1349–1357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BoshaliKI, WirthMA, RockwoodCA, Jr. 2006. Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 88(10):2279–2292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CarterDR, WongM. 2003. Modelling cartilage mechanobiology. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 358(1437):1461–1471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ColeyB, JollesBM, FarronA, AminianK. 2008. Arm position during daily activity. Gait Posture. 28(4):581–587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ColeyB, JollesBM, FarronA, AminianK. 2009. Detection of the movement of the humerus during daily activity. Med Biol Eng Comput. 47(5):467–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EdwardsTB, LabriolaJE, StanleyRJ, OconnorDP, ElkousyHA, GartsmanGM. 2010. Radiographic comparison of pegged and keeled glenoid components using modern cementing techniques: a prospective randomized study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 19(2):251–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EspinhaLC, FernandesPR, FolgadoJ. 2010. Computational analysis of bone remodelling during an anterior cervical fusion. J Biomech. 43(15):2875–2880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FealyS, SperlingJW, WarrenRF. 2008. Shoulder arthroplasty: complex issues in the primary and revision setting. 1st ed. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• FernandesPR, FolgadoJ, JacobsC, PellegriniV. 2002. A contact model with ingrowth control for bone remodelling around cementless stems. J Biomech. 35(2):167–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FernandesP, RodriguesH, JacobsC. 1999. A model of bone adaptation using a global optimisation criterion based on the trajectorial theory of Wolff. Comput Meth Biomech Biomed Eng. 2(2):125–138.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• FolgadoJ, FernandesPR, GuedesJM, RodriguesHC. 2004. Evaluation of osteoporotic bone quality by a computational model for bone remodeling. Comput Struct. 82(17–19):1381–1388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FolgadoJ, FernandesPR, JacobsCR, PellegriniVD, Jr. 2009. Influence of femoral stem geometry, material and extent of porous coating on bone ingrowth and atrophy in cementless total hip arthroplasty: an iterative finite element model. Comput Meth Biomech Biomed Eng. 12(2):135–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GuedesJM, KikuchiN. 1990. Preprocessing and postprocessing for materials based on the homogenization method with adaptive finite element methods. Comput Meth Appl Mech. 83(2):143–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GuptaS, DanP. 2004. Bone geometry and mechanical properties of the human scapula using computed tomography data. Trends Biomater Artif Organs. 17(2):61–70.
   Google Scholar
• GuptaS, van der HelmFC, van KeulenF. 2004. Stress analysis of cemented glenoid prostheses in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Biomech. 37(11):1777–1786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HopkinsAR, HansenUN, AmisAA. 2005. Finite element models of total shoulder replacement: application of boundary conditions. Comput Meth Biomech Biomed Eng. 8(1):39–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• JacobsC, LevenstonME, BeaupreGS, SimoJC, CarterDR. 1995. Numerical instabilities in bone remodeling simulations: the advantages of a node-based finite element approach. J Biomech. 28(4):449–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JacobsC, SimoC, BeaupréG, CarterD. 1997. Adaptive bone remodelling incorporating simultaneous density and anisotropy considerations. J Biomech. 30(6):603–613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LacroixD, MurphyLA, PrendergastPJ. 2000. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of glenoid replacement prostheses: a comparison of keeled and pegged anchorage systems. J Biomech Eng. 122(4):430–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NygaardM, ZerahnB, BruceC, SoballeK, BorgwardtA. 2004. Early periprosthetic femoral bone remodeling using different bearing material combinations in total hip arthroplasties: a prospective randomised study. Eur Cells Mater. 8:65–73.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• QuentalC, FolgadoJ, AmbrósioJ, MonteiroJ. 2012. A multibody biomechanical model of the upper limb including the shoulder girdle. Multibody Sys Dyn. 28(1–2):83–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QuentalC, FolgadoJ, FernandesPR, MonteiroJ. 2012. Bone remodelling analysis of the humerus after a shoulder arthroplasty. Med Eng Phys. 34(8):1132–1138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SantosL, RomeuJC, CanhãoH, FonsecaJE, FernandesPR. 2010. A quantitative comparison of a bone remodelling model with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and analysis of the inter-individual biological variability of femoral neck T-score. J Biomech. 43(16):3150–3155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SharmaGB, DebskiRE, McMahonPJ, RobertsonDD. 2009. Adaptive glenoid bone remodeling simulation. J Biomech. 42(10):1460–1468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SpitzerV, AckermanMJ, ScherzingerAL, WhitlockD. 1996. The visible human male: a technical report. J Am Med Inform Assn. 3(2):118–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TerrierA, BuchlerP, FarronA. 2005. Bone–cement interface of the glenoid component: stress analysis for varying cement thickness. Clin Biomech. 20(7):710–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von SchroederHP, KuiperSD, BotteMJ. 2001. Osseous anatomy of the scapula. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 383:131–139.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WeinansH, HuiskesR, GrootenboerHJ. 1992a. Effects of material properties of femoral hip components on bone remodeling. J Orthop Res. 10(6):846–853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WeinansH, HuiskesR, GrootenboerHJ. 1992b. The behavior of adaptive bone-remodeling simulation models. J Biomech. 25(12):1425–1441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar