Comparison of hinge microflow fields of bileaflet mechanical heart valves implanted in different sinus shape and downstream geometry

References

• ChengR, LaiYG, ChandranKB. 2004. Three-dimensional fluid-structure interaction simulation of bileaflet mechanical heart valve flow dynamics. Ann Biomed Eng. 32(11):1471–1483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DumontK. 2007. Comparison of the hemodynamic and thrombogenic performance of two bileaflet mechanical heart valve using a CFD/FSI model. J Biomech Eng. 129:558–565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EllisJT, HealyTM, FontaineAA, SaxenaR, YoganathanAP. 1996. Velocity measurements and flow patterns within the hinge region of a medtronic parallel bileaflet mechanical heart valve with clear housing. J Heart Valve Dis. 5:591–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EllisJT, TravisBR, YoganathanAP. 2000. An in vitro study of the hinge and near-field forward flow dynamics of the St Jude Medical Regent bileaflet mechanical heart valve. Ann Biomed Eng. 28:524–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EllisJT, YoganathanAP. 2000. A comparison of the hinge and near-hinge flow fields of the St Jude medical hemodynamic plus and regent bileaflet mechanical heart valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 119:83–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FerzigerJH, PericM. 1999. Computational methods for fluid dynamics. 2nd ed. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• HagerA, KaemmererH, Rapp-BernhardtU, BlucherS, RappK, BernhardtTM, GalanskiM, HessJ. 2002. Diameters of the thoracic aorta throughout life as measured with helical computed tomography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 123:1060–1066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HoSY. 2009. Structure and anatomy of the aortic root. Eur J Echocardiogr. 10:i3–i10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HungTC, HochmuthRM, JoistJH, SuteraSP. 1976. Shear-induced aggregation and lysis of platelets. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs. 22:285–291.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KellySG, VerdonckPR, VierendeelsJAM, RiemslaghK, DickE, Van NootenGG. 1999. A three-dimensional analysis of flow in the pivot regions of an ATS bileaflet Valve. Int J Artif Organs. 22:754–763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KingMJ, GordenJ, DavidT, FisherJ. 1996. A three-dimensional, time-dependent analysis of flow through a bileaflet mechanical heart valve: comparison of experimental and numerical results. J Biomech. 29(5):609–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LamsonTC, RosenbergG, GeselowitzDB, DeutschS, StinebringDR, FrangosJA, TarbellJM. 1993. Relative blood damage in the three phases of a prosthetic heart valve flow cycle. ASAIO J. 39:M626–M633.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LeoHL, HeZ, EllisJT, YoganathanAP. 2002. Microflow fields in the hinge region of the Carbomedics bileaflet mechanical heart valve design. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 124:561–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeoHL, SimonHA, DasiLP, YoganathanAP. 2006. Effect of hinge gap width on the microflow structures in 27 mm bileaflet mechanical heart valve. J Heart Valve Dis. 15:800–808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LimWL, ChewYT, ChewTC, LowHT. 2001. Pulsatile flow studies of a porcine bioprosthetic aortic valve in vitro: PIV measurements and shear-induced blood damage. J Biomech. 34(11):1417–1427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LuPC, LaiHC, LiuJS. 2001. A reevaluation and discussion on the threshold limit for hemolysis in a turbulent shear flow. J Biomech. 34(10):1361–1364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MaymirJ-C, DeutschS, MeyerRS, GeselowitzDB, TarbellJM. 1997. Effects of tilting disk heart valve gap width on regurgitant flow through an artificial heart valve. Artif Organs. 21:1014–1025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NguyenV-T, KuanYH, ChenP-Y, GeL, SotiropoulosF, YoganathanAP, LeoHL. 2012. Experimentally validated hemodynamics simulations of mechanical heart valves in three dimensions. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 3(1):88–100.
   Google Scholar
• NicholsWW, O'RoukeMF. 2005. McDonald's blood flow in arteries: theoretical, experimental and clinical principles. 5th ed. London: Hodder Arnold; p. 607.
   Google Scholar
• RamstackJM, ZuckermanL, MockrosLF. 1979. Shear-induced activation of platelets. J Biomech. 12(2):113–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SallamAM, HwangNH. 1984. Human red blood cell hemolysis in a turbulent shear flow: contribution of Reynolds shear stresses. Biorheology. 21(6):783–797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SaxenaR, LemmonJ, EllisJ, YoganathanAP. 2003. An in vitro assessment by means of laser doppler velocimetry of the medtronic advantage bileaflet mechanical heart valve hinge flow. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 126:90–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SimonHA, GeL, SotiropolousF, YoganathanAP. 2010. Simulation of the three-dimensional hinge flow fields of a bileaflet mechanical heart valve under aortic conditions. Ann Biomed Eng. 38(3):841–853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SimonHA, LeoHL, CarberryJ, YoganathanAP. 2004. Comparison of the hinge flow fields of two bileaflet mechanical heart valve under aortic and mitral conditions. Ann Biomed Eng. 32:1607–1617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SlackSM, CuiY, TurittoVT. 1993. The effects of flow on blood coagulation and thrombosis. Thromb Haemost. 70(1):129–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SpalartPR. 2000. Trends in turbulence treatments. Am Inst Aeronautics Astronautics. 2000–2306.
   Google Scholar
• SteegersA, PaulR, ReulH, RauG. 1999. Leakage flow at mechanical heart valve prostheses: improved washout or increased blood damage?J Heart Valve Dis. 8:312–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VongpatanasinW, HillisDL, LangeRA. 1996. Prosthetic heart valves. New Engl J Med. 335:407–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WangJW, YaoH, LimCJ, ZhaoY, YeoTJH, HwangNHC. 2001. Computational fluid dynamics study of a protruded-hinge bileaflet mechanical heart valve. J Heart Valve Dis. 10:254–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WenJ, DingG, JiangW, ZhengT. 2014. Numerical simulation of compliant artery bypass grafts using fluid structure interaction framework. ASAIO J. 60(5):533–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YoganathanAP, ChandranKB, SotiropoulosF. 2005. Flow in prosthetic heart valves: state-of-the-art and future directions. Ann Biomed Eng. 33(12):1689–1694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YunBM, WuJ, SimonHA, ArjunonS, SotiropoulosF, AidunCK, YoganathanAP. 2012. A numerical invesigation of blood damage in the hinge area of aortic bileaflet mechanical heart valves during the leakage phase. Ann of Biomed Eng. 40:1468–1485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar