Pseudo-dynamic analysis of a cemented hip arthroplasty using a force method based on the Newmark algorithm

References

• Arede A, Pinto A. 1994. Analysis of a 4-storey R/C building to be tested in ELSA – the influence of global modeling parameters. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Earthquake Resistant Construction and Design (ERCAD 94); 1994 June 15–17; DGEB-Publication, 8, Vol. 2, p. 931–938.
   Google Scholar
• Basha BM, Babu GLS. 2009. Computation of sliding displacements of bridge abutments by pseudo-dynamic method. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng. 29:103–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathe KJ. 1992. Finite element procedures in engineering analysis. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall; p. 500–520
   Google Scholar
• Brun M, Labbe P, Bertrand D, Courtois A. 2011. Pseudo-dynamic tests on low-rise shear walls and simplified model based on the structural frequency drift. Eng Struct. 33:796–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carneiro J, Queirós de Melo FJ, Pereira J, Teixeira V. 2005. Pseudo-dynamic method for structural analysis of automobile seats. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K. J Multi-body Dyn. 219:337–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carneiro JO, Queirós de Melo FJ, Jalali S, Teixeira V, Tomás M. 2006. The use of pseudo-dynamic method in the evaluation of damping characteristics in reinforced concrete beams having variable bending stiffness. Mech Res Commun. 33:601–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carneiro JAO, Pereira JT, Rocha AJ, de Melo FJMQ. 2001. Structural validation of motor vehicle eeats by pseudodynamic analysis. In: Proceedings of Automotive and Transportation Technology Congress and Exhibition – ATTCE2001, SAE, Barcelona, Vol.1: Safety; Oct 1–3, 2001; p. 199–205.
   Google Scholar
• Chen A, Li CS, Lam SSE, Wong YL. 2002. Testing of a transfer plate by pseudo-dynamic test method with substructure technique. In: Advances in building technology. Oxford: Elsevier; p. 731–738.
   Google Scholar
• Clough RW, Penzien J. 1992. Dynamics of structures. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Co.
   Google Scholar
• Cristofolini L, Viceconti M, Cappello A, Toni A. 1996. Mechanical validation of whole bone composite femur models. J Biomech. 29:525–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher DA, Tsang AC, Paydar N, Milionis S, Turner CH. 1997. Cement-mantle thickness affects cement strains in total HIP replacement. J Biomech. 30:1173–1177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guedes J, Pinto A. 1995. Numerical simulation of the PSD test of R/C bridges. Ispra (Italy): AMU, STI, Ec, JRC. EUR Report.
   Google Scholar
• He L. 1998. Pseudodynamic tests of low-rise metal structures  [Ph.D. thesis]. New York (NY): University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Kukreti AR, Issa HI. 1984. Dynamic analysis of nonlinear structures by pseudo-normal mode superposition method. Comput Struct. 19:653–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennon AB, McCormack BAO, Prendergast PJ. 2003. The relationship between cement fatigue damage and implant surface finish in proximal femoral prostheses. Med Eng Phys. 25:833–841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis G. 2003. Fatigue testing and performance of acrylic bone-cement materials: state-of-the-art review. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater. 66B:457–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magonette G, Molina FJ, Taucer F, Verzeletti G, Renda V, Tognoli P. 1997. Contribution of the JRC Ispra to the inter-comparison of analysis methods for seismically isolated nuclear structures. In: A. A. Balkema, editor. Proceedings of the International Post-SMIRT Conference Seminar on Seismic Isolation, Passive Energy Dissipation and Active Control of Vibrations of Structures, Proceedings of the International Symposium; Aug 25–27. p. 25.
   Google Scholar
• Molina FJ, Verzeletti G, Magonette G, Taucer F. 2000. Dynamic and pseudodynamic responses in a two storey building retrotted with rate-sensitive rubber dissipaters. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering; 2000; Auckland, New Zealand. CD-ROM, Paper No. 634.
   Google Scholar
• Newmark NM. 1959. A method of computation for structural dynamics. J Eng Mech, ASCE. 85(EM3):67–94.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto AV, Verzeletti G, Negro P, y Guedes J. 1995. Cyclic testing of a squat bridge pier. Ispra (Italy): European Laboratory for Structural Assessment (ELSA). Technical report, EUR 16247 EN.
   Google Scholar
• Queirós de Melo FJ, Carneiro JAO, Camanho PP, Tavares CL, Fernandes AA. 2004. The simulation of impact loads on beam-type structures using a pseudo-dynamic procedure. Strain. 40:13–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Queirós de Melo FJ, Carneiro JAO, Tavares CL, Camanho PP, de Castro PT. 2006. A simplified method for the impact test of beams using a pseudo-dynamic (PSD) process. Mech Res. Commun. 33:190–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramaniraka NA, Rakotomanana LR, Leyvraz P-F. 2000. The fixation of the cemented femoral component: effects of stem stiffness, cement thickness and roughness of the cement-bone surface. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 82-B:297–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos A, Completo A, Relvas C, Simões JA. 2012. Design process of a novel cemented hip femoral stem concept. Mater Design. 33:313–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos A, Duarte RJ, Relvas C, Completo A, Simoes JA. 2013. The influence of acetabular bone cracks in the press-fit hip replacement: numerical and experimental analysis. Clin Biomec (Bristol, Avon). 28:635–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos A, Fonseca F, Simões JA. 2003. A preliminary investigation on the influence of cross section geometry on cemented interface stresses in femoral hip replacements. In: Summer Bioengineering Conference; June 29, 2003; p. 0727–0728.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos A, Fonseca F, Simoes JA. 2006. Simulation of physiological loading in total hip replacements. J Biomech Eng. 128:579–587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos A, Simões JA. 2003. HYPERMESH® finite element model of the proximal femur: some considerations. In: Doblaré M, Cerrolaza M, Rodrigues H, editors. International Congress on Computational Bioengineering; Sep 24–26; Zaragoza; p. 321–327.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos A, Simoes J. 2006. Tetrahedral versus hexahedral finite elements in numerical modelling of the proximal femur. Med Eng Phys. 28:916–924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos A, Simões JA. 2009a. In vitro fatigue crack analysis of the Lubinus SPII cemented hip stem. Eng Fail Anal. 16:1294–1302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos A, Simões JA. 2009b. The influence of cement mantle thickness and stem geometry on fatigue damage in two different cemented hip femoral prostheses. J Biomech. 42:2602–2610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolk J, Verdonschot N, Huiskes R. 2001. Hip-joint and abductor-muscle forces adequately represent in vivo loading of a cemented total hip reconstruction. J Biomech. 34(7):917–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar