Diffusion model to describe osteogenesis within a porous titanium scaffold

References

• Adachi T, Osako Y, Tanaka M, Hojo M, Hollister SJ. 2006. Framework for optimal design of porous scaffold microstructure by computational simulation of bone regeneration. Biomaterials. 27(21):3964–3972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreykiv A, Prendergast PJ, van Keulen F, Swieszkowski W, Rozing PM. 2005. Bone ingrowth simulation for a concept glenoid component design. J Biomech. 38(5):1023–1033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreykiv A, van Keulen F, Prendergast PJ. 2008. Computational mechanobiology to study the effect of surface geometry on peri-implant tissue differentiation. J Biomech Eng. 130(5):051015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbas A, Bonnet A-S, Lipinski P, Pesci R, Dubois G. 2012. Development and mechanical characterization of porous titanium bone substitutes. J Mech Behav Biomed. 9:34–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn J, Hodgskinson R, Currey JD, Mason JE. 1992. Mechanical properties of microcallus in human cancellous bone. J Orthop Res. 10(2):237–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne DP, Lacroix D, Planell JA, Kelly DJ, Prendergast PJ. 2007. Simulation of tissue differentiation in a scaffold as a function of porosity, Young's modulus and dissolution rate: application of mechanobiological models in tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 28(36):5544–5554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter DR, Blenman PR, Beaupré GS. 1988. Correlations between mechanical stress history and tissue differentiation in initial fracture healing. J Orthop Res. 6(5):736–748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checa S, Prendergast PJ. 2010. Effect of cell seeding and mechanical loading on vascularization and tissue formation inside a scaffold: A mechano-biological model using a lattice approach to simulate cell activity. J Biomech. 43(5):961–968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Den Boer FC, Patka P, Bakker FC, Wippermann BW, van Lingen A, Vink GQM, Boshuizen K, Haarman HJT. 1999. New segmental long bone defect model in sheep: Quantitative analysis of healing with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Orthop Res. 17(5):654–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen EF, Mosekilde L, Melsen F. 1986. Trabecular bone remodeling and balance in primary hyperparathyroidism. Bone. 7(3):213–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans FG, Lebow M. 1952. The strength of human compact bone as revealed by engineering technics. AM J Surg. 83(3):326–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujibayashi S, Kim H-M, Neo M, Uchida M, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. 2003. Repair of segmental long bone defect in rabbit femur using bioactive titanium cylindrical mesh cage. Biomaterials. 24(20):3445–3451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollister SJ, Maddox RD, Taboas JM. 2002. Optimal design and fabrication of scaffolds to mimic tissue properties and satisfy biological constraints. Biomaterials. 23(20):4095–4103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huiskes R, Driel WDV, Prendergast PJ, Søballe K. 1997. A biomechanical regulatory model for periprosthetic fibrous-tissue differentiation. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 8(12):785–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutmacher DW, Sittinger M, Risbud MV. 2004. Scaffold-based tissue engineering: rationale for computer-aided design and solid free-form fabrication systems. Trends Biotechnol. 22(7):354–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksson H, Comas O, van Donkelaar CC, Mediavilla J, Wilson W, Huiskes R, Ito K. 2007. Bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis: Mechano-regulation by shear strain and fluid velocity. J Biomech. 40(9):2002–2011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksson H, van Donkelaar CC, Huiskes R, Ito K. 2008. A mechano-regulatory bone-healing model incorporating cell-phenotype specific activity. J Theor Biol. 252(2):230–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D. 2005. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials. 26(27):5474–5491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly DJ, Prendergast PJ. 2006. Prediction of the optimal mechanical properties for a scaffold used in osteochondral defect repair. Tissue Eng. 12(9):2509–2519.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lacroix D, Prendergast PJ. 2002. A mechano-regulation model for tissue differentiation during fracture healing: analysis of gap size and loading. J Biomech. 35(9):1163–1171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Niebur GL. 2008. Bone ingrowth into a porous coated implant predicted by a mechano-regulatory tissue differentiation algorithm. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 7(4):335–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Heredia MA, Sohier J, Gaillard C, Quillard S, Dorget M, Layrolle P. 2008. Rapid prototyped porous titanium coated with calcium phosphate as a scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 29(17):2608–2615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malaval L, Liu F, Roche P, Aubin JE. 1999. Kinetics of osteoprogenitor proliferation and osteoblast differentiation in vitro. J Cell Biochem. 74(4):616–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyrueis J-P, Cazenave A. 2004. Consolidation des fractures [Fracture healing]. EMC - Rhumatologie-Orthopédie. 1(2):138–162. French.
   Google Scholar
• Moreo P, García-Aznar JM, Doblaré M. 2009. Bone ingrowth on the surface of endosseous implants. Part 1: Mathematical model. J Theor Biol. 260(1):1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nafei A, Danielsen CC, Linde F, Hvid I. 2000. Properties of growing trabecular ovine bone. Part I: mechanical and physical properties. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 82(6):910–920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otsuki B, Takemoto M, Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. 2006. Pore throat size and connectivity determine bone and tissue ingrowth into porous implants: three-dimensional micro-CT based structural analyses of porous bioactive titanium implants. Biomaterials. 27(35):5892–5900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauwels F. 1960. Eine neue Theorie über den Einfluß mechanischer Reize auf die Differenzierung der Stützgewebe. Z Anat Entwickl Gesch. 121(6):478–515.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pearce AI, Richards RG, Milz S, Schneider E, Pearce SG. 2007. Animal models for implant biomaterial research in bone: a review. Eur Cell Mater. 13:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez MA, Prendergast PJ. 2007. Random-walk models of cell dispersal included in mechanobiological simulations of tissue differentiation. J Biomech. 40(10):2244–2253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prendergast PJ, Huiskes R, Søballe K. 1997. Biophysical stimuli on cells during tissue differentiation at implant interfaces. J Biomech. 30(6):539–548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roshan-Ghias A, Vogel A, Rakotomanana L, Pioletti DP. 2011. Prediction of spatio-temporal bone formation in scaffold by diffusion equation. Biomaterials. 32(29):7006–7012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandino C, Checa S, Prendergast PJ, Lacroix D. 2010. Simulation of angiogenesis and cell differentiation in a CaP scaffold subjected to compressive strains using a lattice modeling approach. Biomaterials. 31(8):2446–2452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanz-Herrera JA, García-Aznar JM, Doblaré M. 2008. Micro-macro numerical modelling of bone regeneration in tissue engineering. Comput Method Appl M. 197(33–40):3092–3107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanz-Herrera JA, García-Aznar JM, Doblaré M. 2009. On scaffold designing for bone regeneration: A computational multiscale approach. Acta Biomater. 5(1):219–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz JP, Hollinger JO. 1986. The critical size defect as an experimental model for craniomandibulofacial nonunions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 205:299–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St-Pierre J-P, Gauthier M, Lefebvre L-P, Tabrizian M. 2005. Three-dimensional growth of differentiating MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblasts on porous titanium scaffolds. Biomaterials. 26(35)–7328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taboas J, Maddox R, Krebsbach P, Hollister S. 2003. Indirect solid free form fabrication of local and global porous, biomimetic and composite 3D polymer-ceramic scaffolds. Biomaterials. 24(1):181–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takemoto M, Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Suzuki J, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. 2005. Mechanical properties and osteoconductivity of porous bioactive titanium. Biomaterials. 26(30):6014–6023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomason JJ, Grovum LE, Deswysen AG, Bignell WW. 2001. In vivo surface strain and stereology of the frontal and maxillary bones of sheep: implications for the structural design of the mammalian skull. Anat Rec. 264(4):325–338.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Willie BM, Bloebaum RD, Bireley WR, Bachus KN, Hofmann AA. 2004. Determining relevance of a weight-bearing ovine model for bone ingrowth assessment. J Biomed Mater Res A. 69(3):567–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar