426
Views
29
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

QCT/FEA predictions of femoral stiffness are strongly affected by boundary condition modeling

, &
Pages 208-216 | Received 17 Jun 2014, Accepted 07 Jan 2015, Published online: 25 Mar 2015

References

  • ANSYS, Mechanical APDL Contact Technology Guide, Chapter 9 (ANSYS 14.0 Help Module), SAS IP, Inc., 2011.
  • Budynas RG. 1999. Advanced strength and applied stress analysis. Boston (MA): McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Cody Dianna D, Gross GJ, Hou FJ, Spencer HJ, Goldstein SA, P. Fyhrie D. 1999. Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA. J Biomech. 32(10):1013–1020. 10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00099-8.
  • Cong A, Op Den Buijs J, Dragomir-Daescu D. 2011. In situ parameter identification of optimal density-elastic modulus relationships in subject-specific finite element models of the proximal femur. Med Eng Phys. 33(2):164–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.09.018.
  • Dall'Ara E, Luisier B, et al. 2013. A nonlinear QCT-based finite element model validation study for the human femur tested in two configurations in vitro. Bone. 52(1):27–38.
  • Dragomir-Daescu D, Op Den Buijs J, McEligot S, Dai Y, Entwistle RC, Salas C, Melton LJ, Bennet KE, Khosla S, Amin S. 2011. Robust QCT/FEA models of proximal femur stiffness and fracture load during a sideways fall on the hip. Ann Biomed Eng. 39(2):742–755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-010-0196-y.
  • Francis A, Kumar V. 2012. Computational modeling of human femur using CT data for finite element analysis. Int J Eng Res Technol. 1(6):1–7.
  • Hertz H. 1881. On the contact of elastic solids. J Math. 92:156–171.
  • Keller G. 1999. Statistics for management and economics. Pacific Grove (CA): Brooks/Cole Publishing Company. p. 674–675.
  • Keyak JH. 2001. Improved prediction of proximal femoral fracture load using nonlinear finite element models. Med Eng Phys. 23(3):165–173. 10.1016/S1350-4533(01)00045-5.
  • Keyak JH, Rossi SA, Jones KA, Skinner HB. 1998. Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling. J Biomech. 31(2):125–133.10.1016/S0021-9290(97)00123-1.
  • Koivumäki JE, Thevenot J, Pulkkinen P, Kuhn V, Link TM, Eckstein F, Jämsä T. 2012. Ct-based finite element models can be used to estimate experimentally measured failure loads in the proximal femur. Bone. 50(4):824–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2012.01.012.
  • Lin LI. 1989. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics. 45(1):255–268. https://doi.org/10.2307/2532051.
  • Mirzaei M, Samiezadeh S, Khodadadi A, Ghazavi MR. 2012. Finite element prediction and experimental verification of the failure pattern of proximal femur using quantitative computed tomography images. Eng Technol. 66:111–117.
  • Morgan EF, Bayraktar HH, Keaveny TM. 2003. Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site. J Biomech. 36(7):897–904. 10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00071-X.
  • Op Den Buijs J, Dragomir-Daescu D. 2011. Validated finite element models of the proximal femur using two-dimensional projected geometry and bone density. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 104(2):168–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.11.008.
  • Orwoll ES, Marshall LM, Nielson CM, Cummings SR, Lapidus J, Cauley JA, Ensrud K, Lane N, Hoffmann PR, Kopperdahl DL, Keaveny TM. 2009. Finite element analysis of the proximal femur and hip fracture risk in older men. J Bone Mineral Res. 24(3):475–483. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.081201.
  • Tanck E, van Aken JB, van der Linden YM, Schreuder HWB, Binkowski M, Huizenga H, Verdonschot N. 2009. Pathological fracture prediction in patients with metastatic lesions can be improved with quantitative computed tomography based computer models. Bone. 45(4):777–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2009.06.009.
  • Trabelsi N, Yosibash Z. 2011. Patient-specific finite-element analyses of the proximal femur with orthotropic material properties validated by experiments. J Biomech Eng Trans ASME. 133(6):1666–1672. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4004180.
  • Verhulp EE, van Rietbergen BB, Huiskes R. 2008. Load distribution in the healthy and osteoporotic human proximal femur during a fall to the side. Bone. 42(1):30–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2007.08.039.
  • Walker GA, Shostak J. 2010. Common statistical methods for clinical research with SAS examples. Cary (NC): SAS Institute Inc.
  • Young W. 1989. Roark's formulas for stress and strain. Boston (MA): McGraw-Hill Education. p. 652.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.