Influence of connection type on the biomechanical behavior of distal extension mandibular removable partial dentures supported by implants and natural teeth

References

• AmbardAJ, FanchiangJC, MueninghoffL, DasanayakeAP. 2002. Cleansability of and patients' satisfaction with implant-retained overdentures. J Am Dent Assoc. 133(9):1237–1242. 10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BergT, CaputoAA. 1993. Maxillary distal-extension removable partial denture abutments with reduced periodontal support. J Prosthet Dent. 70(3):245–250. 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90059-W.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CarrAB, BrownDT. 2010. McCracken's removable partial prosthodontics. St Louis: Elsevier Mosby.
   Google Scholar
• DegerliyurtK, SimsekB, ErkmenE, EserA. 2010. Effects of different fixture geometries on the stress distribution in mandibular peri-implant structures: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 110(2):e1–e11. 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.03.029.
   Google Scholar
• Dos SantosMB, Da Silva NetoJP, ConsaniRL, MesquitaMF. 2011. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution in peri-implant bone with relined dentures and different heights of healing caps. J Oral Rehabil. 38(9):691–696. 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02217.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EraslanO, InanO, SecilmisA. 2010. The effect of framework design on stress distribution in implant-supported FPDs: A 3-D FEM study. Eur J Dent. 4:374–382.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GengJP, TanKB, LiuGR. 2001. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 85(6):585–598. 10.1067/mpr.2001.115251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GriffinTJ, CheungWS. 2004. The use of short, wide implants in posterior areas with reduced bone height: a retrospective investigation. J Prosthet Dent. 92(2):139–144. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.05.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HeckmannSM, WichmannMG, WinterW, MeyerM, WeberHP. 2001. Overdenture attachment selection and the loading of implant and denture-bearing area. Part 1: in vivo verification of stereolithographic model. Clin Oral Implants Res. 12(6):617–623. 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120610.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HolmesDC, Diaz-ArnoldAM, LearyJM. 1996. Influence of post dimension on stress distribution in dentin. J Prosthet Dent. 75(2):140–147. 10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90090-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• İplikçioğluH, AkçaK. 2002. Comparative evaluation of the effect of diameter, length and number of implants supporting three-unit fixed partial prostheses on stress distribution in the bone. J Dent. 30(1):41–46. 10.1016/S0300-5712(01)00057-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IsmailYH, PahountisLN, FlemingJF. 1987. Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional finite element analysis of a blade implant. Int J Oral Implantol. 4:25–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• JeonPD, TurleyPK, MoonHB, TingK. 1999. Analysis of stress in the periodontium of the maxillary first molar with a three-dimensional finite element model. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 115(3):267–274. 10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70328-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KawasakiT, TakayamaY, YamadaT, NotaniK. 2001. Relationship between the stress distribution and the shape of the alveolar residual ridge-three-dimensional behaviour of a lower complete denture. J Oral Rehabil. 28(10):950–957. 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00771.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KonoK, KuriharaD, SuzukiY, OhkuboC. 2014. Pressure distribution of implant-supported removable partial dentures with stress-breaking attachments. J Prosthodont Res. 58(2):115–120. 10.1016/j.jpor.2014.01.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KuYC, ShenYF, ChanCP. 2000. Extracoronal resilient attachments in distal-extension removable partial dentures. Quintessence Int. 31:311–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KuzmanovicDV, PayneAG, PurtonDG. 2004. Distal implants to modify the Kennedy classification of a removable partial denture: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 92(1):8–11. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.04.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LandaLS, ChoSC, FroumSJ, ElianN, TarnowDP. 2001. A prospective 2-year clinical evaluation of overdentures attached to nonsplinted implants utilizing ERA attachments. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 13:151–156; quiz 158.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MenicucciG, MossolovA, MozzatiM, LorenzettiM, PretiG. 2002. Tooth-implant connection: some biomechanical aspects based on finite element analyses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 13(3):334–341. 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130315.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MentagP, KosinskiT. 1991. A clinical case illustrating a new implant abutment. Dent Today. 10(3):48–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MiddletonJ, JonesM, WilsonA. 1996. The role of the periodontal ligament in bone modeling: the initial development of a time-dependent finite element model. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 109(2):155–162. 10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70176-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MijiritskyE, KarasS. 2004. Removable partial denture design involving teeth and implants as an alternative to unsuccessful fixed implant therapy: a case report. Implant Dent. 13(3):218–222. 10.1097/01.id.0000136919.13387.94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MischCE, SuzukiJB, Misch-DietshFM, BidezMW. 2005. A positive correlation between occlusal trauma and peri-implant bone loss: literature support. Implant Dent. 14(2):108–116. 10.1097/01.id.0000165033.34294.db.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• NickenigHJ, SpiekermannH, WichmannM, AndreasSK, EitnerS. 2008. Survival and complication rates of combined tooth-implant-supported fixed and removable partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 21:131–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OhkuboC, KuriharaD, ShimpoH, SuzukiY, KokuboY, HosoiT. 2007. Effect of implant support on distal extension removable partial dentures: in vitro assessment. J Oral Rehabil. 34(1):52–56. 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01641.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PellecchiaM, PellecchiaR, EmtiazS. 2000. Distal extension mandibular removable partial denture connected to an anterior fixed implant-supported prosthesis: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 83(6):0607–0612. 10.1067/mpr.2000.107114.
   Google Scholar
• PellizzerEP, VerriFR, Falcón-AntenucciRM, GoiatoMC, FilhoH. 2010. Evaluation of different retention systems on a distal extension removable partial denture associated with an osseointegrated implant. J Craniofac Surg. 21(3):727–734. 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181d8098a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PetrieCS, WilliamsJL. 2007. Probabilistic analysis of peri-implant strain predictions as influenced by uncertainties in bone properties and occlusal forces. Clin Oral Implants Res. 18(5):611–619. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01384.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PetropoulosVC, ManteFK. 2011. Comparison of retention and strain energies of stud attachments for implant overdentures. J Prosthodont. 20(4):286–293. 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00699.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• StarrNL. 2001. The distal extension case: An alternative restorative design for implant prosthetics. Int J Periodont Rest Dent. 21:61–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TanneK, HiragaJ, SakudaM. 1989. Effects of directions of maxillary protraction forces on biomechanical changes in craniofacial complex. Eur J Orthod. 11:382–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TrushkowskyRD. 1992. Fabrication of an immediate aesthetic overdenture utilizing a resilient attachment. Pract Periodont Aesthet Dent. 4:441–445.
   Google Scholar
• VafaeiF, KhoshhalM, Bayat-MovahedS, AhangaryAH, FiroozF, IzadyA, RakhshanV. 2011. Comparative stress distribution of implant-retained mandibular ball-supported and bar-supported overlay dentures: a finite element analysis. J Oral Implantol. 37(4):421–429. 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van StadenRC, GuanH, LooYC. 2006. Application of the finite element method in dental implant research. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 9(4):257–270. 10.1080/10255840600837074.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• VermeulenAH, KeltjensHM, van't HofMA, KayserAF. 1996. Ten-year evaluation of removable partial dentures: survival rates based on retreatment, not wearing and replacement. J Prosthet Dent. 76(3):267–272. 10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90170-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VerriFR, PellizzerEP, RochaEP, PereiraJA. 2007. Influence of length and diameter of implants associated with distal extension removable partial dentures. Implant Dent. 16(3):270–280. 10.1097/ID.0b013e31805007aa.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YamadaT. 1987. Basic studies on Konuskronen by using the finite element method. Part 2 stress analysis of mandibular distal-extention removable partial denture. Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi. 31(1):186–199. 10.2186/jjps.31.186.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• YokoyamaS, WakabayashiN, ShiotaM, OhyamaT. 2004. The influence of implant location and length on stress distribution for three-unit implant-supported posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 91(3):234–240. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.12.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZafiropoulosGG, HoffmannO. 2009. Five-year study of implant placement in regenerated bone and rehabilitation with telescopic crown retained dentures: a case report. J Oral Implantol. 35(6):303–309. 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00009R1.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar