Evaluation of bone remodeling around single dental implants of different lengths: a mechanobiological numerical simulation and validation using clinical data

References

• Adell R. 1983. Clinical results of osseointegrated implants supporting fixed prostheses in edentulous jaws. J Prosthet Dent. 50:251–254.10.1016/0022-3913(83)90026-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. 1986. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1:11–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baggi L, Cappelloni I, Di Girolamo M, Maceri F, Vairo G. 2008. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 100:422–431.10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60259-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brånemark PI, Breine U, Adell R, Hansson BO, Lindström J, Ohlsson Å. 1969. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses: I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 3:81–100.10.3109/02844316909036699
   Google Scholar
• Cehreli MC, Akca K. 2005. Mechanobiology of bone and mechanocoupling of endosseous titanium oral implants. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 15:139–152.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chou H-Y, Müftü S. 2013. Simulation of peri-implant bone healing due to immediate loading in dental implant treatments. J Biomech. 46:871–878.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.12.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook RD, Weisberg S. 1982. Residuals and influence in regression. New York (NY): Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz M, Wassall T, Toledo EM, da Silva Barra LP, Cruz S. 2009. Finite element stress analysis of dental prostheses supported by straight and angled implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 24:391–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittmer MP, Kohorst P, Borchers L, Stiesch M. 2010. Influence of the supporting structure on stress distribution in all-ceramic FPDs. Int J Prosthodont. 23:63–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duyck J, Naert I, Ronold HJ, Ellingsen JE, Van Oosterwyck H, Vander Sloten J. 2001. The influence of static and dynamic loading on marginal bone reactions around osseointegrated implants: an animal experimental study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 12:207–218.10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012003207.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eser A, Tonuk E, Akca K, Cehreli MC. 2009. Numeric simulation of time-dependent remodeling of bone around loaded oral implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 24:597–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eser A, Tonuk E, Akca K, Dard MM, Cehreli MC. 2013. Predicting bone remodeling around tissue- and bone-level dental implants used in reduced bone width. J Biomech. 46:2250–2257.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.06.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost HM. 2003. Bone's mechanostat: a 2003 update. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 275A:1081–1101.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0185
   Google Scholar
• Froum SJ, Rosen PS, Clem DS. 2013. Response to ‘on crestal/marginal bone loss around dental implants’. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 33:407–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong H, Zhu D, Gao J, Lv L, Zhang X. 2010. An adaptation model for trabecular bone at different mechanical levels. Biomed Eng Online. 9:32.10.1186/1475-925X-9-32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guljé F, Abrahamsson I, Chen S, Stanford C, Zadeh H, Palmer R. 2013. Implants of 6 mm vs. 11 mm lengths in the posterior maxilla and mandible: a 1-year multicenter randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 24:1325–1331.10.1111/clr.2013.24.issue-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hof M, Pommer B, Zukic N, Vasak C, Lorenzoni M, Zechner W. 2015. Influence of prosthetic parameters on peri-implant bone resorption in the first year of loading: a multi-factorial analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 17:e183–e191.10.1111/cid.2015.17.issue-s1
   Google Scholar
• Huiskes R. 2000. If bone is the answer, then what is the question? J Anat. 197:145–156.10.1046/j.1469-7580.2000.19720145.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs CR, Levenston ME, Beaupré GS, Simo JC, Carter DR. 1995. Numerical instabilities in bone remodeling simulations: the advantages of a node-based finite element approach. J Biomech. 28:449–459.10.1016/0021-9290(94)00087-K
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung YC, Han CH, Lee KW. 1996. A 1-year radiographic evaluation of marginal bone around dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 11:811–818.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kokkinos PA, Zarkadis IK, Kletsas D, Deligianni DD. 2009. Effects of physiological mechanical strains on the release of growth factors and the expression of differentiation marker genes in human osteoblasts growing on Ti-6Al-4V. J Biomed Mater Res A. 90A:387–395.10.1002/jbm.a.v90a:2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenston ME, Beaupré GS, Jacobs CR, Carter DR. 1994. The role of loading memory in bone adaptation simulations. Bone. 15:177–186.10.1016/8756-3282(94)90705-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin D, Li Q, Li W, Swain M. 2009. Dental implant induced bone remodeling and associated algorithms. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2:410–432.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahnama A, Tafazzoli-Shadpour M, Geramipanah F, Mehdi Dehghan M. 2013. Verification of the mechanostat theory in mandible remodeling after tooth extraction: animal study and numerical modeling. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 20:354–362.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.02.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara LM, Prendergast PJ. 2007. Bone remodelling algorithms incorporating both strain and microdamage stimuli. J Biomech. 40:1381–1391.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellal A, Wiskott HWA, Botsis J, Scherrer SS, Belser UC. 2004. Stimulating effect of implant loading on surrounding bone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 15:239–248.10.1111/clr.2004.15.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monje A, Suarez F, Galindo-Moreno P, García-Nogales A, Fu J-H, Wang H-L. 2014. A systematic review on marginal bone loss around short dental implants (<10 mm) for implant-supported fixed prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 25:1119–1124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papaspyridakos P, Chen C-J, Singh M, Weber H-P, Gallucci GO. 2012. Success criteria in implant dentistry: a systematic review. J Dent Res. 91:242–248.10.1177/0022034511431252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian J, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. 2012. Reasons for marginal bone loss around oral implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 14:792–807.10.1111/cid.2012.14.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raggatt LJ, Partridge NC. 2010. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of bone remodeling. J Biol Chem. 285:25103–25108.10.1074/jbc.R109.041087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roos-Jansaker AM, Lindahl C, Renvert H, Renvert S. 2006. Nine- to fourteen-year follow-up of implant treatment. Part II: presence of peri-implant lesions. J Clin Periodontol. 33:290–295.10.1111/cpe.2006.33.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulte FA, Lambers FM, Webster DJ, Kuhn G, Müller RG. 2011. In vivo validation of a computational bone adaptation model using open-loop control and time-lapsed micro-computed tomography. Bone. 49:1166–1172.10.1016/j.bone.2011.08.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shunmugasamy VC, Gupta N, Coelho PG. 2010. High strain rate response of rabbit femur bones. J Biomech. 43:3044–3050.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.06.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotto-Maior BS, Senna PM, da Silva WJ, Rocha EP, Del Bel Cury AA. 2012. Influence of crown-to-implant ratio, retention system, restorative material, and occlusal loading on stress concentrations in single short implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 27:e13–e18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stanford CM, Brand RA. 1999. Toward an understanding of implant occlusion and strain adaptive bone modeling and remodeling. J Prosthet Dent. 81:553–561.10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70209-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Türk AG1, Ulusoy M, Toksavul S, Güneri P, Koca H. 2013. Marginal bone loss of two implant systems with three different superstructure materials: a randomised clinical trial. J Oral Rehabil. 40:457–463.10.1111/joor.2013.40.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vairo G, Sannino G. 2013. Comparative evaluation of osseointegrated dental implants based on platform-switching concept: influence of diameter, length, thread shape, and in-bone positioning depth on stress-based performance. Comput Math Methods Med. 25:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Li Q, McClean C, Fan Y. 2013. Numerical simulation of dental bone remodeling induced by implant-supported fixed partial denture with or without cantilever extension. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 29:1134–1147.10.1002/cnm.2579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wazen RM, Currey JA, Guo H, Brunski JB, Helms JA, Nanci A. 2013. Micromotion-induced strain fields influence early stages of repair at bone–implant interfaces. Acta Biomater. 9:6663–6674.10.1016/j.actbio.2013.01.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinans H, Huiskes R, Grootenboer HJ. 1992. The behavior of adaptive bone-remodeling simulation models. J Biomech. 25:1425–1441.10.1016/0021-9290(92)90056-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woda A, Mishellany A, Peyron M. 2006. The regulation of masticatory function and food bolus formation. J Oral Rehabil. 33:840–849.10.1111/jor.2006.33.issue-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar