Quantitative MRI water content mapping of porcine intervertebral disc during uniaxial compression

References

• Adams MA, Freeman BJC, Morrison HP, Nelson IW, Dolan P. 2000. Mechanical initiation of intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine. 25:1625–1636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alini M, Eisenstein SM, Ito K, Little C, Kettler AA, Masuda K, Melrose J, Ralphs J, Stokes I, Wilke HJ. 2008. Are animal models useful for studying human disc disorders/degeneration? Eur Spine J. 17:2–19.10.1007/s00586-007-0414-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen KD, Athanasiou KA. 2006. Viscoelastic characterization of the porcine temporomandibular joint disc under unconfined compression. J Biomech. 39:312–322.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.11.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoniou J, Steffen T, Nelson F, Winterbottom N, Hollander AP, Poole RA, Aebi M, Alini M. 1996. The human lumbar intervertebral disc: evidence for changes in the biosynthesis and denaturation of the extracellular matrix with growth, maturation, ageing, and degeneration. J Clin Invest. 98:996–1003.10.1172/JCI118884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoniou J, Mwale F, Demers CN, Beaudoin G, Goswami T, Aebi M, Alini M. 2006. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of enzymatically induced degradation of the nucleus pulposus of intervertebral discs. Spine. 31:1547–1554.10.1097/01.brs.0000221995.77177.9d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoniou J, Epure LM, Michalek AJ, Grant MP, Iatridis JC, Mwale F. 2013. Analysis of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging and biomechanical parameters on human discs with different grades of degeneration. J Magn Reson Imaging. 38:1402–1414.10.1002/jmri.24120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argoubi M, Shirazi-Adl, A. 1996. Poroelastic creep response analysis of a lumbar motion segment in compression. J Biomech. 29:1331–1339.10.1016/0021-9290(96)00035-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ateshian GA, Warden WH, Kim JJ, Grelsamer RP, Mow VC. 1997. Finite deformation biphasic material properties of bovine articular cartilage from confined compression experiments. J Biomech. 30:1157–1164.10.1016/S0021-9290(97)85606-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aziz HN, Galbusera F, Bellini CM, Mineo GV, Addis A, Pietrabissa R, Brayda-Bruno M. 2008. Porcine models in spinal research: calibration and comparative finite element analysis of various configurations during flexion-extension. Comp Med. 58:174–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balkovec C, McGill S. 2012. Extent of nucleus pulposus migration in the annulus of porcine intervertebral discs exposed to cyclic flexion only versus cyclic flexion and extension. Clin Biomech. 27:766–770.10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bibby SRS, Jones DA, Lee RB, Yu J, Urban JPG. 2001. The pathophysiology of the intervertebral disc. Joint Bone Spine. 68(6):537–542.10.1016/S1297-319X(01)00332-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bibby SRS, Jones DA, Lee RB, Yu J, Urban JPG. 2001. Biochimie, biologie et physiologie du disque intervertébral. Revue du Rhumatisme. 68:903–907.10.1016/S1169-8330(01)00215-0
   Google Scholar
• Boos N, Wallin A, Gbedegbegnon T, Aebi M, Boesch C. 1993. Quantitative MR imaging of lumbar intervertebral disks and vertebral bodies: influence of diurnal water content variations. Radiology. 188:351–354.10.1148/radiology.188.2.8327677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boos N, Wallin A, Schmucker T, Aebi M, Boesch C. 1994. Quantitative MR imaging of lumbar intervertebral discs and vertebral bodies: methodology, reproducibility, and preliminary results. Magn Reson Imaging. 12:577–587.10.1016/0730-725X(94)92452-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boos N, Wallin A, Aebi M, Boesch C. 1996. A new magnetic resonance imaging analysis method for the measurement of disc height variations. Spine. 21:563–570.10.1097/00007632-199603010-00006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botsford DJ, Esses SI, Ogilvie-Harris DJ. 1994. In vivo diurnal variation in intervertebral disc volume and morphology. Spine. 19:935–940.10.1097/00007632-199404150-00012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen RM. 1980. Incompressible porous media models by use of the theory of mixtures. Int J Eng Sci. 18:1129–1148.10.1016/0020-7225(80)90114-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaghan PT. 2005. Some perspectives on dispersion and the use of ensemble-averaged PGSE NMR. Magn Reson Imaging. 23:133–137.10.1016/j.mri.2004.11.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaghan JP, McGill SM. 2001. Intervertebral disc herniation: studies on a porcine model exposed to highly repetitive flexion/extension motion with compressive force. Clin Biomech. 16:28–37.10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00063-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu EJ, Newitt DC, Segal MR, Hu SS, Lotz JC, Majumdar S. 2001. Magnetic resonance imaging measurement of relaxation and water diffusion in the human lumbar intervertebral disc under compression in vitro. Spine. 26:E437–E444.10.1097/00007632-200110010-00017
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen B, Lai W, Mow V. 1998. A transversely isotropic biphasic model for unconfined compression of growth plate and chondroepiphysis. J Biomech Eng. 120:491–496.10.1115/1.2798019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuchanski M, Cook D, Jegapragasan M, Whiting DM, Cheng BC. 2010. Measurement of disc bulge of the intervertebral disc: an in vitro study using human cadaver lumbar spine segments. ArgoSpine News J. 22:73–80.
   Google Scholar
• Das DB, Welling A, Urban JPG, Boubriak OA. 2009. Solute transport in intervertebral disc: experiments and finite element modeling. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1161:44–61.10.1111/j.1749-6632.2008.04075.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dath R, Ebinesan AD, Porter KM, Miles AW. 2007. Anatomical measurements of porcine lumbar vertebrae. Clin Biomech. 22:607–613.10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.01.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etienne M, Boiron O, Tropiano P, Deplano V. 2011. Nutrient convection and diffusion modelling in the intervertebral disc. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 14:145–146.10.1080/10255842.2011.593942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghiss M, Giannesini B, Tropiano P, Tourki Z, Boiron O. 2014. NMR imaging investigation of the incompressible poroelastic behavior of porcine intervertebral disc under external mechanical stress. Matériaux Tech. 101:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Lin J, Ashby P, Pruitt L. 2009. A fiber reinforced poroelastic model of nanoindentation of porcine costal cartilage: A combined experimental and finite element approach. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2(4):326–338; discussion 337–338.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han SM, Lee SY, Cho MH, Lee JK. 2001. Disc hydration measured by magnetic resonance imaging in relation to its compressive stiffness in rat models. J Eng Med. 215:497–501.10.1243/0954411011536091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansson T, Keller T, Spengler D. 1988. Mechanical behavior of the human lumbar spine. II. Fatigue strength during dynamic compressive loading. J Orthop Res. 6:479–487.
   Google Scholar
• Holm S, Maroudas A, Urban JP, Selstam G, Nachemson A. 1981. Nutrition of the intervertebral disc: solute transport and metabolism. Connective Tissue Res. 8:101–119.10.3109/03008208109152130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone B, Urban JPG, Roberts S, Menage J. 1992. Comparison between fluid content and swelling pressure profiles of discs removed at surgery and those taken postmortem. Spine. 17:412–416.10.1097/00007632-199204000-00006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastler, B, Vetter D. 2011. Comprendre l’IRM. 7th ed. In: Masson E, editor.
   Google Scholar
• Laible JP, Pflaster DS, Krag MH, Simon BR, Haugh LD. 1993. A poroelastic-swelling finite element model with application to the intervertebral disc. Spine. 18:659–670
   Google Scholar
• Magnier C, Boiron O, Wendling-Mansuy S, Chabrand P, Deplano V. 2009. Nutrient distribution and metabolism in the intervertebral disc in the unloaded state: a parametric study. J Biomech. 42:100–108.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.10.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malko JA, Hutton WC, Fajman WA. 1999. An in vivo magnetic resonance imaging study of changes in the volume (and fluid content) of the lumbar intervertebral discs during a simulated diurnal load cycle. Spine. 24:1015–1022.10.1097/00007632-199905150-00016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maroudas A, Stockwell RA, Nachemson A, Urban J. 1975. Factors involved in the nutrition of the intervertebral disc: cellularity and diffusion of glucose in vitro. Journal Anat. 120:113–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan DW, Garbutt G, Adams MA. 1996. Effect of sustained loading on the water content of intervertebral discs: implications for disc metabolism. Ann Rheum Dis. 55:880–887.10.1136/ard.55.12.880
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moré JJ. 1978. The Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm: implementation and theory. Vol. 630. In: Watson GA, editor. Numerical analysis, Lecture Notes in Mathematics; p. 105–116.
   Google Scholar
• Mow VC, Hou JS, Owens JM, Ratcliffe A. 1990. Biphasic and quasilinear viscoelastic theories for hydrated soft tissues. In: Ratcliffe SL-Y, Woo A, Mow VC, editors. Biomechanics of diarthrodial joints. p. 215–260. ISBN: 978-1-4612-8015-610.1007/978-1-4612-3448-7
   Google Scholar
• Mwale F, Demers CN, Michalek AJ, Beaudoin G, Goswami T, Beckman L, Iatridis JC, Antoniou J. 2008. Evaluation of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging, biochemical and mechanical properties of trypsin-treated intervertebral discs under physiological compression loading. J Magn Reson Imaging. 27:563–573.10.1002/(ISSN)1522-2586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mwale F, Iatridis J, Antoniou J. 2008. Quantitative MRI as a diagnostic tool of intervertebral disc matrix composition and integrity. Eur Spine J. 17:432–440.10.1007/s00586-008-0744-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazari J, Pope MH, Graveling RA. 2015. Feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in obtaining nucleus pulposus (NP) water content with changing postures. Magn Reson Imaging. 17:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Ohshima H, Tsuji H, Hirano N, Ishihara H, Katoh Y, Yamada H. 1989. Water diffusion pathway, swelling pressure, and biomechanical properties of the intervertebral disc during compression load. Spine. 14:1234–1244.10.1097/00007632-198911000-00017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagiotacopulos ND. 1987. Water content in human intervertebral discs. Part I. Measurement by magnetic resonance imaging. Spine. 12:912–917.10.1097/00007632-198711000-00012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel Shyam A, Kepler Christopher K, Schaer Thomas P, Greg Anderson D. 2014. Large animal models of disc degeneration . In: Irving M. Shapiro, Makarand V. Risbud, editors., The Intervertebral disc molecular and structural studies of the disc in health and disease; p. 291–303.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce RH, Grimmer BJ, Adams ME. 1987. Degeneration and the chemical composition of the human lumbar intervertebral disc. J Orthop Res. 5:198–205.10.1002/(ISSN)1554-527X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Périé D, Iatridis JC, Demers CN, Goswami T, Beaudoin G, Mwale F, Antoniou J. 2006. Assessment of compressive modulus, hydraulic permeability and matrix content of trypsin-treated nucleus pulposus using quantitative MRI. J Biomech. 39:1392–1400.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.04.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabischong P, Louis R, Massare JVC. 1978. Le disque intervertébral [The Intervertebral Disc]. Anat Clin. 1:55–64.10.1007/BF01654348
   Google Scholar
• Rannou F, Mayoux-Benhamou MA, Poiraudeau S, Revel M. 2004. Anatomy, biology, physiology and biomechanics of intervertebral disk and other anatomical structures of the lumbar spine. EMC-Rhumatol Orthop. 1:487–507.10.1016/j.emcrho.2003.11.007
   Google Scholar
• Recuerda M, Périé M, Gilbert G, Beaudoin G. 2012. Assessment of mechanical properties of isolated bovine intervertebral discs from multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging. BioMed Central Musculoskelet Disord. 13:1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid JE, Meakin JR, Robins SP, Skakle JM, Hukins DW. 2002. Sheep lumbar intervertebral discs as models for human discs. Clin Biomech. 17:312–314.10.1016/S0268-0033(02)00009-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riches PE, Dhillon N, Lotz J, Woods AW, McNally DS. 2002. The internal mechanics of the intervertebral disc under cyclic loading. J Biomech. 35:1263–1271.10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00070-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro EM, Borthakur A, Kaufman JH, Leigh JS, Reddy R. 2001. Water distribution patterns inside bovine articular cartilage as visualized by1H magnetic resonance imaging. Osteoarthr Cartilage. 9:533–538.10.1053/joca.2001.0428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirazi-Adl A, Taheri M., Urban, JPG. 2010. Analysis of cell viability in intervertebral disc: effect of endplate permeability on cell population. J Biomech. 43:1330–1336.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.01.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva P, Crozier S, Veidt M, Pearcy MJ. 2005. An experimental and finite element poroelastic creep response analysis of an intervertebral hydrogel disc model in axial compression. J Mater Sci Mat Med. 16:663–669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon BR. 1991. Poroelastic finite element models in biomechanics. In: K. R. Williams, A. Toni, J. Middleton, G. Pallotti editors. Interfaces in medicine and mechanics – 2; p 279–288. ISBN: 978-1-85166-583-910.1007/978-94-011-3852-9
   Google Scholar
• Singh K, Masuda K, An HS. 2005. Animal models for human disc degeneration. The Spine J. 5:S267–S279.10.1016/j.spinee.2005.02.016
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Southern EP, Fye MA, Panjabi MM, Patel TC, Cholewicki J. 2000. Disc degeneration: a human cadaveric study correlating magnetic resonance imaging and quantitative discomanometry. Spine. 25:2171–2175.10.1097/00007632-200009010-00005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Z, Liu M, Zhang Y. 2008. An animal model to create intervertebral disc degeneration characterized by radiography and molecular biology. J Nanjing Med Univ. 22:308–312.10.1016/S1007-4376(08)60086-6
   Google Scholar
• Urban J, Winlove C. 2007. Pathophysiology of the intervertebral disc and the challenges for MRI. J Magn Resonan Imaging. 25:419–432.10.1002/(ISSN)1522-2586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urban JPG, Smith S, Fairbank JCT. 2004. Nutrition of the intervertebral disc. Spine. 29:2700–2709.10.1097/01.brs.0000146499.97948.52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson W. 2005. A Comparison between mechano-electrochemical and biphasic swelling theories for soft hydrated tissues. J Biomech Eng. 127:158–165.10.1115/1.1835361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo D, Young YE, Kim S, Kim H. 2007. Simulation of the disc degeneration with a poroelastic finite element model. J Mech Sci Technol. 21:1178–1183.10.1007/BF03179033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Q, Jackson AR, Gu WY. 2012. Cell viability in intervertebral disc under various nutritional and dynamic loading conditions: 3d finite element analysis. J Biomech. 45:2769–2777.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.08.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou J, Yang H, Miyazaki M, Morishita Y, Wei F, McGovern S, Wang JC. 2009. Dynamic bulging of intervertebral discs in the degenerative lumbar spine. Spine. 34:2545–2550.10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b32998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar