An automatic approach for calibrating dielectric bone properties by combining finite-element and optimization software tools

References

• Aaron RK, Ciombor DM, Simon BJ. 2004. Treatment of nonunions with electric and electromagnetic fields. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 419:21–29.10.1097/00003086-200402000-00005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassett CA. 1982. Pulsing electromagnetic fields: a new method to modify cell behavior in calcified and noncalcified tissues. Calcif Tissue Int. 34:1–8.10.1007/BF02411199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassett CA, Mitchell SN, Gaston SR. 1981. Treatment of ununited tibial diaphyseal fractures with pulsing electromagnetic fields. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 63:511–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassett CA, Valdes MG, Hernandez E. 1982. Modification of fracture repair with selected pulsing electromagnetic fields. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 64:888–895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellenrieder M, Tischer T, Kreuz PC, Fröhlich S, Fritsche A, Mittelmeier W. 2013. Arthroscopically assisted therapy of avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 25(1):85–94.10.1007/s00064-011-0072-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel C, Gabriel S, Corthout E. 1996. The dielectric properties of biological tissues: I. Literature survey. Phys Med Biol. 41:2231–2249.10.1088/0031-9155/41/11/001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel S, Lau RW, Gabriel C. 1996a. The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz. Phys Med Biol. 41:2251–2269.10.1088/0031-9155/41/11/002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel S, Lau RW, Gabriel C. 1996b. The dielectric properties of biological tissues: III. Parametric models for the dielectric spectrum of tissues. Phys Med Biol. 41:2271–2293.10.1088/0031-9155/41/11/003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin XL, Costa ML, Parsons N, Smith N. 2011. Electromagnetic field stimulation for treating delayed union or non-union of long bone fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 4: CD008471.
   Google Scholar
• Hambli R. 2014. Connecting mechanics and bone cell activities in the bone remodeling process: an integrated finite element modeling. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2:6. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2014.00006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hassler CR, Rybicki EF, Diegle RB, Clark LC. 1977. Studies of enhanced bone healing via electrical stimuli. Comparative effectiveness of various parameters. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 124:9–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaacson BM, Stinstra JG, Bloebaum RD, Pasquina PF, MacLeod RS. 2011. Establishing multiscale models for simulating whole limb estimates of electric fields for osseointegrated implants. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 58:2991–2994.10.1109/TBME.2011.2160722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluess D, Souffrant R, Mittelmeier W, Wree A, Schmitz KP, Bader R. 2009. A convenient approach for finite-element-analyses of orthopaedic implants in bone contact: modeling and experimental validation. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 95:23–30.10.1016/j.cmpb.2009.01.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosterich JD, Foster KR, Pollack SR. 1983. Dielectric permittivity and electrical conductivity of fluid saturated bone. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 30:81–86.10.1109/TBME.1983.325201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakes RS, Harper RA, Katz JL. 1977. Dielectric relaxation in cortical bone. J Appl Phys. 48:808–811.10.1063/1.323674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller CE, Henriquez CS. 1990. Finite element analysis of bioelectric phenomena. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 18:207–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otter MW, McLeod KJ, Rubin CT. 1998. Effects of electromagnetic fields in experimental fracture repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res. S90–104.10.1097/00003086-199810001-00011
   Google Scholar
• Peyman A. 2011. Dielectric properties of tissues; variation with age and their relevance in exposure of children to electromagnetic fields; state of knowledge. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 107:434–438.10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2011.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prodanovic M, Malesevic M, Filipovic T, Tevtic T, Bijelic G, Malesevic N. 2014. Numerical simulation of the energy distribution biological tissues during electrical stimulation. Serb J Electr Eng. 10:165–173.
   Google Scholar
• Reinish GB, Nowick AS. 1976. Effect of moisture on the electrical properties of bone. J Electrochem Soc. 123:1451–1455.10.1149/1.2132617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha S, Reddy GN, Albright JA. 1984. Factors affecting the measurement of bone impedance. Med Biol Eng Comput. 22:123–129.10.1007/BF02446814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha S, Williams PA. 1989. Electric and dielectric properties of wet human cancellous bone as a function of frequency. Ann Biomed Eng. 17:143–158.10.1007/BF02368024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sansen W, De Dijcker F, Stan S. 1978. Four-point measurement of the impedance of bone in vivo. Electric stimulation of bone growth and repair. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; p. 15–18.10.1007/978-3-642-81193-7
   Google Scholar
• Sierpowska J, Toyras J, Hakulinen MA, Saarakkala S, Jurvelin JS, Lappalainen R. 2003. Electrical and dielectric properties of bovine trabecular bone relationships with mechanical properties and mineral density. Phys Med Biol. 48:775–786.10.1088/0031-9155/48/6/306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh S, Saha S. 1984. Electrical properties of bone. A review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 186:249–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares dos Santos MP, Ferreira JA, Ramos A, Simões JA, Morais R, Silva NM, Santos PM, Reis MC, Oliveira T. 2014. Instrumented hip joint replacements, femoral replacements and femoral fracture stabilizers. Expert Rev Med Dev. 11:617–635.10.1586/17434440.2014.946695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares dos Santos MP, Ferreira JA, Ramos A, Simões JA. 2015. Active orthopaedic implants: towards optimality. J Franklin Inst. 352:813–834.10.1016/j.jfranklin.2014.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soda A, Ikehara T, Kinouchi Y, Yoshizaki K. 2008. Effect of exposure to an extremely low frequency-electromagnetic field on the cellular collagen with respect to signaling pathways in osteoblast-like cells. J Med Invest. 55:267–278.10.2152/jmi.55.267
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Su Y, Souffrant R, Kluess D, Ellenrieder M, Mittelmeier W, van Rienen U, Bader R. 2014. Evaluation of electric field distribution in electromagnetic stimulation of human femoral head. Bioelectromagnetics. 35:547–558.10.1002/bem.v35.8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao F, Fu F, You F, Ji Z, Wen J, Shi X, Dong X, Yang M. 2014. The correlation between dielectric properties and microstructure of femoral bone in rats with different bone qualities. Ann Biomed Eng. 42:1238–1249.10.1007/s10439-014-0998-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Qi L, Chen G. 2006. New inverse method for identification of constitutive parameters. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China. 16:148–152.10.1016/S1003-6326(06)60026-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar