Subject-specific geometrical detail rather than cost function formulation affects hip loading calculationFootnote^*

^*All work was conducted at KU Leuven.

References

• Ackland DC, Lin Y-C, Pandy MG. 2012. Sensitivity of model predictions of muscle function to changes in moment arms and muscle–tendon properties: a Monte-Carlo analysis. J Biomech. 45:1463–1471.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.02.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson FC, Pandy MG. 2001a. Static and dynamic optimization solutions for gait are practically equivalent. J Biomech. 34:153–161.10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00155-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson FC, Pandy MG. 2001b. Dynamic optimization of human walking. J Biomech Eng. 123:381–390.10.1115/1.1392310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold AS, Salinas S, Asakawa DJ, Delp SL. 2000. Accuracy of muscle moment arms estimated from MRI-based musculoskeletal models of the lower extremity. Comput Aided Surg. 5:108–119.10.3109/10929080009148877
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bartels W, Vander Sloten J, Jonkers I. 2012. Sensitivity analysis of hip joint centre estimation based on three-dimensional CT scans. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 15:539–546.10.1080/10255842.2010.548323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels W, Demol J, Gelaude F, Jonkers I, Vander Sloten J. 2015. Computed tomography-based joint locations affect calculation of joint moments during gait when compared to scaling approaches. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 18:1238–1251.10.1080/10255842.2014.890186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, Strauss J, Duda GN. 2001. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech. 34:859–871.10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00040-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besl PJ, McKay ND. 1992. A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 14:239–256.10.1109/34.121791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blemker SS, Delp SL. 2005. Three-dimensional representation of complex muscle architectures and geometries. Ann Biomed Eng. 33:661–673.10.1007/s10439-005-1433-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosmans L, Wesseling M, Desloovere K, Molenaers G, Scheys L, Jonkers I. 2014. Hip contact force in presence of aberrant bone geometry during normal and pathological gait. J Orthop Res. 32:1406–1415.10.1002/jor.v32.11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosmans L, Valente G, Wesseling M, Van Campen A, De Groote F, De Schutter J, Jonkers I. 2015. Sensitivity of predicted muscle forces during gait to anatomical variability in musculotendon geometry. J Biomech. 48:2116–2123.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.02.052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand RA, Pedersen DR, Friederich JA. 1986. The sensitivity of muscle force predictions to changes in physiologic cross-sectional area. J Biomech. 19:589–596.10.1016/0021-9290(86)90164-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Campen A, Pipeleers G, De Groote F, Jonkers I. 2014. A new method for estimating subject-specific muscle – tendon parameters of the knee joint actuators: a simulation study. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 30:969–987.10.1002/cnm.v30.10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa TA, Crossley KM, Kim HJ, Pandy MG. 2010. Contributions of individual muscles to hip joint contact force in normal walking. J Biomech. 43:1618–1622.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.02.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damm P, Bender A, Bergmann G. 2015. Postoperative changes in in vivo measured friction in total hip joint prosthesis during walking. PLoS One. 10:e0120438.10.1371/journal.pone.0120438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damsgaard M, Rasmussen J, Christensen ST, Surma E, de Zee M. 2006. Analysis of musculoskeletal systems in the anybody modeling system. Simul Model Pract Theor. 14:1100–1111.10.1016/j.simpat.2006.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groote F, Pipeleers G, Jonkers I, Demeulenaere B, Patten C, Swevers J, De Schutter J. 2009. A physiology based inverse dynamic analysis of human gait: potential and perspectives. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 12:563–574.10.1080/10255840902788587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groote F, Van Campen A, Jonkers I, De Schutter J. 2010. Sensitivity of dynamic simulations of gait and dynamometer experiments to hill muscle model parameters of knee flexors and extensors. J Biomech. 43:1876–1883.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.03.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delp SL, Loan JP, Hoy MG, Zajac FE, Topp EL, Rosen JM. 1990. An interactive graphics-based model of the lower extremity to study orthopaedic surgical procedures. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 37:757–767.10.1109/10.102791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delp SL, Anderson FC, Arnold AS, Loan P, Habib A, John CT, Guendelman E, Thelen DG. 2007. OpenSim: open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 54:1940–1950.10.1109/TBME.2007.901024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers MS, Pal S, Delp SL. 2014. Changes in tibiofemoral forces due to variations in muscle activity during walking. J Orthop Res. 32:769–776.10.1002/jor.22601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duda G, Brand D, Freitag S. 1996. Variability of femoral muscle attachments. J Biomech. 29:1185–1190.10.1016/0021-9290(96)00025-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felson DT. 2004. Obesity and vocational and avocational overload of the joint as risk factors for osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol. 31:2–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraysse F, Dumas R, Cheze L, Wang X. 2009. Comparison of global and joint-to-joint methods for estimating the hip joint load and the muscle forces during walking. J Biomech. 42:2357–2362.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.06.056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelaude F, Lauwers B, Vander Sloten J. 2008. Accuracy assessment of CT-based outer surface femur meshes. Comput Aided Surg. 13:188–199.10.3109/10929080802195783
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hainisch R, Gfoehler M, Zubayer-Ul-Karim M, Pandy MG. 2012. Method for determining musculotendon parameters in subject-specific musculoskeletal models of children developed from MRI data. Multibody Syst Dyn. 28:143–156.10.1007/s11044-011-9289-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausselle J, Assi A, El Helou A, Jolivet E, Pillet H, Dion E, Bonneau D, Skalli W. 2012. Subject-specific musculoskeletal model of the lower limb in a lying and standing position. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 17:37–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller MO, Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Dürselen L, Pohl M, Claes L, Haas NP, Duda GN. 2001. Musculo-skeletal loading conditions at the hip during walking and stair climbing. J Biomech. 34:883–893.10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00039-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller MO, Bergmann G, Kassi J-P, Claes L, Haas NP, Duda GN. 2005. Determination of muscle loading at the hip joint for use in pre-clinical testing. J Biomech. 38:1155–1163.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein Horsman MD. 2007. The twente lower extremity model: consistent dynamic simulation of the human locomotor apparatus PhD thesis. University of Twente, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Klein Horsman MD, Koopman HFJM, van der Helm FCT, Prosé LP, Veeger HEJ. 2007. Morphological muscle and joint parameters for musculoskeletal modelling of the lower extremity. Clin Biomech. 22:239–247.10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenaerts G, Bartels W, Gelaude F, Mulier M, Spaepen A, Van der Perre G, Jonkers I. 2009. Subject-specific hip geometry and hip joint centre location affects calculated contact forces at the hip during gait. J Biomech. 42:1246–1251.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.03.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenaerts G, Mulier M, Spaepen A, Van der Perre G, Jonkers I. 2009. Aberrant pelvis and hip kinematics impair hip loading before and after total hip replacement. Gait Posture. 30:296–302.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.05.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu TW, O’Connor JJ. 1999. Bone position estimation from skin marker co-ordinates using global optimisation with joint constraints. J Biomech. 32:129–134.10.1016/S0021-9290(98)00158-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martelli S, Taddei F, Cappello A, van Sint Jan S, Leardini A, Viceconti M. 2011. Effect of sub-optimal neuromotor control on the hip joint load during level walking. J Biomech. 44:1716–1721.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.03.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martelli S, Valente G, Viceconti M, Taddei F. 2015. Sensitivity of a subject-specific musculoskeletal model to the uncertainties on the joint axes location. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 18:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellon SJ, Grammatopoulos G, Andersen MS, Pegg EC, Pandit HG, Murray DW, Gill HS. 2013. Individual motion patterns during gait and sit-to-stand contribute to edge-loading risk in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Eng Med. 227:799–810.10.1177/0954411913483639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modenese L, Phillips ATM, Bull AMJ. 2011. An open source lower limb model: hip joint validation. J Biomech. 44:2185–2193.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.06.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moissenet F, Chèze L, Dumas R. 2014. A 3D lower limb musculoskeletal model for simultaneous estimation of musculo-tendon, joint contact, ligament and bone forces during gait. J Biomech. 47:50–58.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.10.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen D, Brand R, Cheng C, Arora J. 1987. Direct comparison of muscle force predictions using linear and nonlinear programming. J Biomech Eng. 109:192–199.10.1115/1.3138669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellikaan P, van der Krogt MM, Carbone V, Fluit R, Vigneron LM, Van Deun J, Verdonschot N, Koopman HFJM. 2014. Evaluation of a morphing based method to estimate muscle attachment sites of the lower extremity. J Biomech. 47:1144–1150.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.12.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Praagman M, Chadwick EKJ, van der Helm FCT, Veeger HEJ. 2006. The relationship between two different mechanical cost functions and muscle oxygen consumption. J Biomech. 39:758–765.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.11.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheys L, Jonkers I, Loeckx D, Maes F. 2006. Image based musculoskeletal modeling allows personalized biomechanical analysis of gait. Lect Notes Comput Sci 4072:58–66.10.1007/11790273
   Google Scholar
• Scheys L, Van Campenhout A, Spaepen A, Suetens P, Jonkers I. 2008. Personalized MR-based musculoskeletal models compared to rescaled generic models in the presence of increased femoral anteversion: effect on hip moment arm lengths. Gait Posture. 28:358–365.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheys L, Spaepen A, Suetens P, Jonkers I. 2008. Calculated moment-arm and muscle-tendon lengths during gait differ substantially using MR based versus rescaled generic lower-limb musculoskeletal models. Gait Posture. 28:640–648.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderkvist I, Wedin P. 1993. Determining the movements of the skeleton using well-configured markers. J Biomech. 26:1473–1477.10.1016/0021-9290(93)90098-Y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stansfield BW, Nicol AC, Paul JP, Kelly IG, Graichen F, Bergmann G. 2003. Direct comparison of calculated hip joint contact forces with those measured using instrumented implants. An evaluation of a three-dimensional mathematical model of the lower limb. J Biomech. 36:929–936.10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00072-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele KM, Demers MS, Schwartz MH, Delp SL. 2012. Compressive tibiofemoral force during crouch gait. Gait Posture. 35:556–560.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.11.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele KM, van der Krogt MM, Schwartz MH, Delp SL. 2012. How much muscle strength is required to walk in a crouch gait? J Biomech. 45:2564–2569.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.07.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen DG. 2003. Adjustment of muscle mechanics model parameters to simulate dynamic contractions in older adults. J Biomech Eng. 125:70–77.10.1115/1.1531112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen DG, Anderson FC, Delp SL. 2003. Generating dynamic simulations of movement using computed muscle control. J Biomech. 36:321–328.10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00432-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente G, Pitto L, Testi D, Seth A, Delp SL, Stagni R, Viceconti M, Taddei F. 2014. Are subject-specific musculoskeletal models robust to the uncertainties in parameter identification? PLoS One. 9:e112625.10.1371/journal.pone.0112625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesseling M, Derikx LC, de Groote F, Bartels W, Meyer C, Verdonschot N, Jonkers I. 2015. Muscle optimization techniques impact the magnitude of calculated hip joint contact forces. J Orthop Res. 33:430–438.10.1002/jor.v33.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winby CR, Lloyd DG, Kirk TB. 2008. Evaluation of different analytical methods for subject-specific scaling of musculotendon parameters. J Biomech. 41:1682–1688.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu G, Siegler S, Allard P, Kirtley C, Leardini A, Rosenbaum D, Whittle M, D’Lima DD, Cristofolini L, Witte H, et al. 2002. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion – part I: ankle, hip, and spine. J Biomech. 35:543–548.10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00222-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar