Interactive graph-cut segmentation for fast creation of finite element models from clinical ct data for hip fracture prediction

References

• Amin S, Kopperdhal DL, Melton LJ, 3rd, Achenbach SJ, Therneau TM, Riggs BL, Keaveny TM, Khosla S. 2011. Association of hip strength estimates by finite-element analysis with fractures in women and men. J Bone Miner Res. 26:1593–1600.10.1002/jbmr.347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayraktar HH, Morgan EF, Niebur GL, Morris GE, Wong EK, Keaveny TM. 2004. Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue. J Biomech. 37:27–35.10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00257-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben Younes L, Nakajima Y, Saito T. 2014. Fully automatic segmentation of the femur from 3D-CT images using primitive shape recognition and statistical shape models. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 9:189–196.10.1007/s11548-013-0950-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessho M, Ohnishi I, Matsumoto T, Ohashi S, Matsuyama J, Tobita K, Kaneko M, Nakamura K. 2009. Prediction of proximal femur strength using a CT-based nonlinear finite element method: differences in predicted fracture load and site with changing load and boundary conditions. Bone. 45:226–231.10.1016/j.bone.2009.04.241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boykov Y, Funka-Lea G. 2006. Graph cuts and efficient N-D image segmentation. Int J Comput Vision. 70:109–131.10.1007/s11263-006-7934-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boykov Y, Kolmogorov V. 2004. An experimental comparison of min-cut/max-flow algorithms for energy minimization in vision. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 26:1124–1137.10.1109/TPAMI.2004.60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter DR, Hayes WC. 1977. Compressive behavior of bone as a 2-phase porous structure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 59:954–962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng YZ, Zhou SJ, Wang YD, Guo CY, Bai J, Tamura S. 2013. Automatic segmentation technique for acetabulum and femoral head in CT images. Pattern Recogn. 46:2969–2984.10.1016/j.patcog.2013.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doria D, Chen S. 2010. Interactive Image Graph Cut Segmentation. The Insight Journal July–December.
   Google Scholar
• Falcinelli C, Schileo E, Balistreri L, Baruffaldi F, Bordini B, Viceconti M, Albisinni U, Ceccarelli F, Milandri L, Toni A, Taddei F. 2014. Multiple loading conditions analysis can improve the association between finite element bone strength estimates and proximal femur fractures: a preliminary study in elderly women. Bone. 67:71–80.10.1016/j.bone.2014.06.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritscher KD, Grunerbl A, Schubert R. 2007. 3D image segmentation using combined shape-intensity prior models. Int J Comput Assist Radiol. 1:341–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hangartner TN, Short DF. 2007. Accurate quantification of width and density of bone structures by computed tomography. Med Phys. 34:3777–3784.10.1118/1.2769102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helgason B, Viceconti M, Rúnarsson TP, Brynjólfsson S. 2008. On the mechanical stability of porous coated press fit titanium implants: a finite element study of a pushout test. J Biomech. 41:1675–1681.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kainmueller D, Lamecker H, Zachow S, Hege HC. 2009. An articulated statistical shape model for accurate hip joint segmentation. IEEE Eng Med Bio. 2009:6345–6351.
   Google Scholar
• Kang Y, Engelke K, Kalender WA. 2003. A new accurate and precise 3-D segmentation method for skeletal structures in volumetric CT data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 22:586–598.10.1109/TMI.2003.812265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaptoge S, da Silva JA, Brixen K, Reid DM, Kröger H, Nielsen TL, Andersen M, Hagen C, Lorenc R, Boonen S, et al. 2008. Geographical variation in DXA bone mineral density in young European men and women. Results from the Network in Europe on Male Osteoporosis (NEMO) study. Bone. 43:332–339.10.1016/j.bone.2008.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyak JH, Sigurdsson S, Karlsdottir G, Oskarsdottir D, Sigmarsdottir A, Zhao S, Kornak J, Harris TB, Sigurdsson G, Jonsson BY, et al. 2011. Male–female differences in the association between incident hip fracture and proximal femoral strength: a finite element analysis study. Bone. 48:1239–1245.10.1016/j.bone.2011.03.682
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyak JH, Sigurdsson S, Karlsdottir GS, Oskarsdottir D, Sigmarsdottir A, Kornak J, Harris TB, Sigurdsson G, Jonsson BY, Siggeirsdottir K, et al. 2013. Effect of finite element model loading condition on fracture risk assessment in men and women: the AGES-Reykjavik study. Bone. 57:18–29.10.1016/j.bone.2013.07.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopperdahl DL, Aspelund T, Hoffmann PF, Sigurdsson S, Siggeirsdottir K, Harris TB, Gudnason V, Keaveny TM. 2014. Assessment of incident spine and hip fractures in women and men using finite element analysis of CT scans. J Bone Miner Res. 29:570–580.10.1002/jbmr.v29.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krcah M, Szekely G, Blanc R. 2011. Fully automatic and fast segmentation of the femur bone from 3D-CT images with no shape prior. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro. Chicago, IL. March 30 2011-April 2 2011; p. 2087–2090.10.1109/ISBI.2011.5872823
   Google Scholar
• Lang TF, Sigurdsson S, Karlsdottir G, Oskarsdottir D, Sigmarsdottir A, Chengshi J, Kornak J, Harris TB, Sigurdsson G, Jonsson BY, et al. 2012. Age-related loss of proximal femoral strength in elderly men and women: the Age Gene/Environment Susceptibility Study – Reykjavik. Bone. 50:743–748.10.1016/j.bone.2011.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie WD, Morin S. 2011. Fracture burden in relation to low bone mineral density and FRAX® probability. J Clin Densitom. 14:279–285.10.1016/j.jocd.2011.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looker AC, Orwoll ES, Johnston CC, Jr., Lindsay RL, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Calvo MS, Harris TB, Heyse SP. 1997. Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older U.S. adults from NHANES III. J Bone Miner Res. 12:1761–1768.10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.11.1761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan EF, Bayraktar HH, Keaveny TM. 2003. Trabecular bone modulus–density relationships depend on anatomic site. J Biomech. 36:897–904.10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00071-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orwoll ES, Marshall LM, Nielson CM, Cummings SR, Lapidus J, Cauley JA, Ensrud K, Lane N, Hoffmann PR, Kopperdahl DL, Keaveny TM, Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study Group. 2009. Finite element analysis of the proximal femur and hip fracture risk in older men. J Bone Miner Res. 24:475–483.10.1359/jbmr.081201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahr DH, Zysset PK. 2009. From high-resolution CT data to finite element models: development of an integrated modular framework. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 12:45–57.10.1080/10255840802144105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkkari J, Kannus P, Palvanen M, Natri A, Vainio J, Aho H, Vuori I, Jarvinen M. 1999. Majority of hip fractures occur as a result of a fall and impact on the greater trochanter of the femur: a prospective controlled hip fracture study with 206 consecutive patients. Calcif Tissue Int. 65:183–187.10.1007/s002239900679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peleg E, Herblum R, Beek M, Joskowicz L, Liebergall M, Mosheiff R, Whyne C. 2014. Can a partial volume edge effect reduction algorithm improve the repeatability of subject-specific finite element models of femurs obtained from CT data? Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 17:204–209.10.1080/10255842.2012.673595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poelert S, Valstar E, Weinans H, Zadpoor AA. 2013. Patient-specific finite element modeling of bones. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 227:464–478.10.1177/0954411912467884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schileo E, Dall’ara E, Taddei F, Malandrino A, Schotkamp T, Baleani M, Viceconti M. 2008. An accurate estimation of bone density improves the accuracy of subject-specific finite element models. J Biomech. 41:2483–2491.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.05.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treece GM, Gee AH, Mayhew PM, Poole KE. 2010. High resolution cortical bone thickness measurement from clinical CT data. Med Image Anal. 14:276–290.10.1016/j.media.2010.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viceconti M, Davinelli M, Taddei F, Cappello A. 2004. Automatic generation of accurate subject-specific bone finite element models to be used in clinical studies. J Biomech. 37:1597–1605.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.12.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang LI, Greenspan M, Ellis R. 2006. Validation of bone segmentation and improved 3-D registration using contour coherency in CT data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 25:324–334.10.1109/TMI.2005.863834
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitmarsh T, Treece GM, Poole KES. 2014. Automatic segmentation and discrimination of connected joint bones from CT by multi-atlas registration. Lecture notes in computational vision and biomechanics. In: J. Yao, T. Klinder and S. Li. Proceedings of the Workshop held at the 16th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention; September 22-26, 2013, Nagoya, Japan, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; p. 199–207.10.1007/978-3-319-07269-2
   Google Scholar
• Yokota F, Okada T, Takao M, Sugano N, Tada Y, Tomiyama N, Sato Y. 2013. Automated CT segmentation of diseased hip using hierarchical and conditional statistical shape models. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. In: K. Mori, I. Sakuma, Y. Sato, C. Barillot and N. Navab. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; p. 190–197.10.1007/978-3-642-40763-5
   Google Scholar