687
Views
28
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Subject-specific musculoskeletal modelling in patients before and after total hip arthroplastyFootnote*

, , , , , & show all
Pages 1683-1691 | Received 22 May 2015, Accepted 18 Apr 2016, Published online: 28 Apr 2016

References

  • Ackland DC, Lin Y-C, Pandy MG. 2012. Sensitivity of model predictions of muscle function to changes in moment arms and muscle–tendon properties: a Monte-Carlo analysis. J Biomech. 45:1463–1471.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.02.023
  • Anderson FC, Pandy MG. 2001. Dynamic optimization of human walking. J Biomech Eng. 123:381–390.10.1115/1.1392310
  • Andriacchi T, Mündermann A, Smith LR, Alexander EJ, Dyrby CO, Koo S. 2004. A framework for the in vivo pathomechanics of osteoarthritis at the knee. Ann Biomed Eng. 32:447–457.10.1023/B:ABME.0000017541.82498.37
  • Arokoski MH, Arokoski JPA, Haara M, Kankaanpää M, Vesterinen M, Niemitukia LH, Helminen HJ. 2002. Hip muscle strength and muscle cross sectional area in men with and without hip osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol. 29:2185–2195.
  • Bartels W, Demol J, Gelaude F, Jonkers I, Vander Sloten J. 2015. Computed tomography-based joint locations affect calculation of joint moments during gait when compared to scaling approaches. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 18:1238–1251.10.1080/10255842.2014.890186
  • Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, Strauss J, Duda GN. 2001. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech. 34:859–871.10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00040-9
  • Bosmans L, Valente G, Wesseling M, Van Campen A, De Groote F, De Schutter J, Jonkers I. 2015. Sensitivity of predicted muscle forces during gait to anatomical variability in musculotendon geometry. J Biomech. 48:2116–2123.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.02.052
  • Bosmans L, Wesseling M, Desloovere K, Molenaers G, Scheys L, Jonkers I. 2014. Hip contact force in presence of aberrant bone geometry during normal and pathological gait. J Orthop Res. 32:1406–1415.10.1002/jor.v32.11
  • Davis RB, Õunpuu S, Tyburski D, Gage JR. 1991. A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique. Hum Mov Sci. 10:575–587.10.1016/0167-9457(91)90046-Z
  • De Groote F, Van Campen A, Jonkers I, De Schutter J. 2010. Sensitivity of dynamic simulations of gait and dynamometer experiments to hill muscle model parameters of knee flexors and extensors. J Biomech. 43:1876–1883.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.03.022
  • Delp SL, Loan JP, Hoy MG, Zajac FE, Topp EL, Rosen JM. 1990. An interactive graphics-based model of the lower extremity to study orthopaedic surgical procedures. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 37:757–767.10.1109/10.102791
  • Delp SL, Anderson FC, Arnold AS, Loan P, Habib A, John CT, Guendelman E, Thelen DG. 2007. OpenSim: open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 54:1940–1950.10.1109/TBME.2007.901024
  • Foucher KC, Hurwitz DE, Wimmer MA. 2007. Preoperative gait adaptations persist one year after surgery in clinically well-functioning total hip replacement patients. J Biomech. 40:3432–3437.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.05.020
  • Foucher KC, Hurwitz DE, Wimmer MA. 2009. Relative importance of gait vs. joint positioning on hip contact forces after total hip replacement. J Orthop Res. 27:1576–1582.10.1002/jor.20935
  • Garner BA, Pandy MG. 2003. Estimation of musculotendon properties in the human upper limb. Ann Biomed Eng. 31:207–220.10.1114/1.1540105
  • Hainisch R, Gfoehler M, Zubayer-Ul-Karim M, Pandy MG. 2012. Method for determining musculotendon parameters in subject-specific musculoskeletal models of children developed from MRI data. Multibody Syst Dyn. 28:143–156.10.1007/s11044-011-9289-0
  • Jonkers I, Sauwen N, Lenaerts G, Mulier M, Van der Perre G, Jaecques S. 2008. Relation between subject-specific hip joint loading, stress distribution in the proximal femur and bone mineral density changes after total hip replacement. J Biomech. 41:3405–3413.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.09.011
  • Klein Horsman MD. 2007. The Twente lower extremity model: consistent dynamic simulation of the human locomotor apparatus [PhD thesis]. Enschede: University of Twente.
  • van der Krogt MM, Delp SL, Schwartz MH. 2012. How robust is human gait to muscle weakness? Gait Posture. 36:113–119.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.01.017
  • Lenaerts G, Bartels W, Gelaude F, Mulier M, Spaepen A, Van der Perre G, Jonkers I. 2009. Subject-specific hip geometry and hip joint centre location affects calculated contact forces at the hip during gait. J Biomech. 42:1246–1251.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.03.037
  • Lenaerts G, De Groote F, Demeulenaere B, Mulier M, Van der Perre G, Spaepen A, Jonkers I. 2008. Subject-specific hip geometry affects predicted hip joint contact forces during gait. J Biomech. 41:1243–1252.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.01.014
  • Lenaerts G, Mulier M, Spaepen A, Van der Perre G, Jonkers I. 2009. Aberrant pelvis and hip kinematics impair hip loading before and after total hip replacement. Gait Posture. 30:296–302.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.05.016
  • Li J, Redmond AC, Jin Z, Fisher J, Stone MH, Stewart TD. 2014. Hip contact forces in asymptomatic total hip replacement patients differ from normal healthy individuals: implications for preclinical testing. Clin Biomech. 29:747–751.10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.06.005
  • Li J, McWilliams AB, Jin Z, Fisher J, Stone MH, Redmond AC, Stewart TD. 2015. Unilateral total hip replacement patients with symptomatic leg length inequality have abnormal hip biomechanics during walking. Clin Biomech. 30:513–519.10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.02.014
  • Lloyd DG, Besier TF. 2003. An EMG-driven musculoskeletal model to estimate muscle forces and knee joint moments in vivo. J Biomech. 36:765–776.10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00010-1
  • Logist F, Houska B, Diehl M, Van Impe J. 2010. Fast Pareto set generation for nonlinear optimal control problems with multiple objectives. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 42:591–603.10.1007/s00158-010-0506-x
  • Lu TW, O’Connor JJ. 1999. Bone position estimation from skin marker co-ordinates using global optimisation with joint constraints. J Biomech. 32:129–134.10.1016/S0021-9290(98)00158-4
  • Martelli S, Valente G, Viceconti M, Taddei F. 2015. Sensitivity of a subject-specific musculoskeletal model to the uncertainties on the joint axes location. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 18:1–9.
  • Mellon SJ, Grammatopoulos G, Andersen MS, Pegg EC, Pandit HG, Murray DW, Gill HS. 2013. Individual motion patterns during gait and sit-to-stand contribute to edge-loading risk in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Eng Med. 227:799–810.10.1177/0954411913483639
  • Meyer C, Corten K, Wesseling M, Peers K, Simon J-P, Jonkers I, Desloovere K. 2013. Test-retest reliability of innovated strength tests for hip muscles. PLoS One. 8:e81149.10.1371/journal.pone.0081149
  • Mizner R, Stevens J, Snyder-Mackler L. 2003. Voluntary activation and decreased force production of the quadriceps femoris muscle after total knee arthroplasty. Phys Ther. 83:359–365.
  • Raasch C, Zajac F, Ma B, Levine W. 1997. Muscle coordination of maximum-speed pedaling. J Biomech. 30:595–602.10.1016/S0021-9290(96)00188-1
  • Scheys L, Jonkers I, Loeckx D, Maes F. 2006. Image based musculoskeletal modeling allows personalized biomechanical analysis of gait. Lect Notes Comput Sci. 4072:58–66.10.1007/11790273
  • Scheys L, Van Campenhout A, Spaepen A, Suetens P, Jonkers I. 2008. Personalized MR-based musculoskeletal models compared to rescaled generic models in the presence of increased femoral anteversion: effect on hip moment arm lengths. Gait Posture. 28:358–365.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.05.002
  • Stansfield BW, Nicol AC. 2002. Hip joint contact forces in normal subjects and subjects with total hip prostheses: walking and stair and ramp negotiation. Clin Biomech. 17:130–139.10.1016/S0268-0033(01)00119-X
  • Steele KM, Demers MS, Schwartz MH, Delp SL. 2012. Compressive tibiofemoral force during crouch gait. Gait Posture. 35:556–560.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.11.023
  • Stevens JE, Mizner RL, Snyder-Mackler L. 2003. Quadriceps strength and volitional activation before and after total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. J Orthop Res. 21:775–779.10.1016/S0736-0266(03)00052-4
  • Szwedowski TD, Taylor WR, Heller MO, Perka C, Müller M, Duda GN. 2012. Generic rules of mechano-regulation combined with subject specific loading conditions can explain bone adaptation after THA. PLoS One. 7:e36231.10.1371/journal.pone.0036231
  • Thelen DG. 2003. Adjustment of muscle mechanics model parameters to simulate dynamic contractions in older adults. J Biomech Eng. 125:70–77.10.1115/1.1531112
  • Valente G, Taddei F, Jonkers I. 2013. Influence of weak hip abductor muscles on joint contact forces during normal walking: probabilistic modeling analysis. J Biomech. 46:2186–2193.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.06.030
  • Valente G, Pitto L, Testi D, Seth A, Delp SL, Stagni R, Viceconti M, Taddei F. 2014. Are subject-specific musculoskeletal models robust to the uncertainties in parameter identification? PLoS One. 9:e112625.10.1371/journal.pone.0112625
  • Van Campen A, Pipeleers G, De Groote F, Jonkers I. 2014. A new method for estimating subject-specific muscle – tendon parameters of the knee joint actuators: a simulation study. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 30:969–987.10.1002/cnm.v30.10
  • Wesseling M, Derikx LC, de Groote F, Bartels W, Meyer C, Verdonschot N, Jonkers I. 2015. Muscle optimization techniques impact the magnitude of calculated hip joint contact forces. J Orthop Res. 33:430–438.10.1002/jor.v33.3
  • Wesseling M, Meyer C, Corten K, Simon J-P, Desloovere K, Jonkers I. 2016. Does surgical approach or prosthesis type affect hip joint loading one year after surgery? Gait Posture. 44:74–82.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.11.009
  • Wesseling M, De Groote F, Bosmans L, Bartels W, Meyer C, Desloovere K, Jonkers I. 2016. Subject-specific geometrical detail rather than cost function formulation affects hip loading calculation. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 1–14.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.