3D finite element modeling of pelvic organ prolapse

References

• Addington WR, Stephens RE, Phelipa MM, Widdicombe JG, Ockey RR. 2008. Intra-abdominal pressures during voluntary and reflex cough. Cough. 4:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Amundsen CL, Flynn BJ, Webster GD. 2003. Anatomical correction of vaginal vault prolapse by uterosacral ligament fixation in women who also require a pubovaginal sling. J Urol. 169:1770–1774.10.1097/01.ju.0000061472.94183.26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartscht KD, DeLancey JO. 1988. A technique to study the passive supports of the uterus. Obstet Gynecol. 72:940–943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boreham MK, Wai CY, Miller RT, Schaffer JI, Word RA. 2002. Morphometric properties of the posterior vaginal wall in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 187:1501–1508, discussion 1508-9.10.1067/mob.2002.130005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyles, SH, Weber M, Meyn L. 2003. Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979–1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 188:108–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Ashton-Miller JA, Hsu Y, DeLancey JO. 2006. Interaction among apical support, levator ani impairment, and anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 108:324–332.10.1097/01.AOG.0000227786.69257.a8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen PY, Lin AY, McKittrick J, Meyers MA. 2008. Structure and mechanical properties of crab exoskeletons. Acta Biomaterialia. 4:587–596.10.1016/j.actbio.2007.12.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO. 2009. A 3D finite element model of anterior vaginal wall support to evaluate mechanisms underlying cystocele formation. J Biomech. 42:1371–1377.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.04.043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen ZW, Joli P, Feng ZQ. 2011. Finite element modelling of interactions between pelvic organs due to pressure. 10e colloque national en calcul des structures (pp. Clé-USB).
   Google Scholar
• Chen L, Ramanah R, Hsu Y, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO. 2013. Cardinal and deep uterosacral ligament lines of action: MRI based 3D technique development and preliminary findings in normal women. Int Urogynecol J. 24:37–45.10.1007/s00192-012-1801-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb WS, Burns JM, Kercher KW, Matthews BD, James Norton H, Todd Heniford B. 2005. Normal intraabdominal pressure in healthy adults. J Surg Res. 129:231–235.10.1016/j.jss.2005.06.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corton MM. 2005. Anatomy of the pelvis: how the pelvis is built for support. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 48:611–626.10.1097/01.grf.0000170578.24583.64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creighton SM, Pearce JM, Stanton SL. 1992. Perineal video-ultrasonography in the assessment of vaginal prolapse: early observations. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 99:310–313.10.1111/bjo.1992.99.issue-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DeLancey JO, Morgan DM, Fenner DE, Kearney R, Guire K, Miller JM, Hussain H, Umek W, Hsu Y, Ashton-Miller JA. 2007. Comparison of levator Ani muscle defects and function in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 109:295–302.10.1097/01.AOG.0000250901.57095.ba
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feola A, Duerr R, Moalli P, Abramowitch S. 2013. Changes in the rheological behavior of the vagina in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 24:1221–1227.10.1007/s00192-012-2002-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel B, Denschlag D, Göbel H, Fittkow C, Werner M, Gitsch G, Watermann D. 2005. Uterosacral ligament in postmenopausal women with or without pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 16:475–479.10.1007/s00192-005-1294-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel B, Rubod C, Brieu M, Dedet B, de Landsheere L, Delmas V, Cosson M. 2011. Vagina, abdominal skin, and aponeurosis: do they have similar biomechanical properties? Int Urogynecol J. 22:23–27.10.1007/s00192-010-1237-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauth EA, Jaeger HJ, Libera H, Lange S, Forsting M. 2007. MR imaging of the uterus and cervix in healthy women: Determination of normal values. Eur Radiol. 17:734–742.10.1007/s00330-006-0313-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilbrun ME, Nygaard IE, Lockhart ME, Richter HE, Brown MB, Kenton KS, Rahn DD, Thomas JV, Weidner AC, Nager CW, Delancey JO. 2010. Correlation between levator ani muscle injuries on magnetic resonance imaging and fecal incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and urinary incontinence in primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 202:488.e1–488.e6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A. 2002. Pelvic organ prolapse in the women's health initiative: Gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 186:1160–1166.10.1067/mob.2002.123819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard D, Miller JM, Delancey JO, Ashton-Miller JA. 2000. Differential effects of cough, valsalva, and continence status on vesical neck movement. Obstet Gynecol. 95:535–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyte L, Schierlitz L, Zou K, Flesh G, Fielding JR. 2001. Two- and 3-dimensional MRI comparison of levator ani structure, volume, and integrity in women with stress incontinence and prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 185:11–19.10.1067/mob.2001.116365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu Y, Chen L, Delancey JO, Ashton-Miller JA. 2005. Vaginal thickness, cross-sectional area, and perimeter in women with and those without prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 105:1012–1014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquetin B, Fatton B, Rosenthal C, Clavé H, Debodinance P, Hinoul P, Gauld J, Garbin O, Berrocal J, Villet R, Lizée DS. 2010. Total transvaginal mesh (TVM) technique for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a 3-year prospective follow-up study. Int Urogynecol J. 21:1455–1462.10.1007/s00192-010-1223-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jean-Charles C, Rubod C, Brieu M, Boukerrou M, Fasel J, Cosson M. 2010. Biomechanical properties of prolapsed or non-prolapsed vaginal tissue: impact on genital prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 21:1535–1538.10.1007/s00192-010-1208-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelovsek JE, Maher C, Barber MD. 2007. Pelvic organ prolapse. Lancet. 369:1027–1038.10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60462-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones KA, Shepherd JP, Oliphant SS, Wang L, Bunker CH, Lowder JL. 2010. Trends in inpatient prolapse procedures in the United States, 1979–2006. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 202: 501-e1–e14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu PF, Krestin GP, Huch RA, Göhde SC, Caduff RF, Debatin JF. 1998. MRI of the uterus, uterine cervix, and vagina: diagnostic performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar gradient-echo imaging in comparison with fast spin-echo T2-weighted pulse imaging. Eur Radiol. 8:1433–1440.10.1007/s003300050569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo J, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO. 2011. A model patient: female pelvic anatomy can be viewed in diverse 3-dimensional images with a new interactive tool. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 205:391.e1–391.e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo J, Smith TM, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO. 2014. In vivo properties of uterine suspensory tissue in pelvic organ prolapse. J Biomech Eng. 136:021016.10.1115/1.4026159
   Google Scholar
• Majumder S, Roychowdhury A, Pal S. 2008. Effects of trochanteric soft tissue thickness and hip impact velocity on hip fracture in sideways fall through 3D finite element simulations. J Biomech. 41:2834–2842.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malbrain ML. 2004. Different techniques to measure intra-abdominal pressure (IAP): time for a critical re-appraisal. Intensive Care Med. 30:357–371.10.1007/s00134-003-2107-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malbrain ML, Deeren DH. 2006. Effect of bladder volume on measured intravesical pressure: a prospective cohort study. Crit Care (London, England). 10:R98.
   Google Scholar
• Martins P, Silva-Filho AL, Fonseca AM, Santos A, Santos L, Mascarenhas T, Jorge RM, Ferreira AM. 2013. Strength of round and uterosacral ligaments: a biomechanical study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 287:313–318.10.1007/s00404-012-2564-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazza E, Nava A, Bauer M, Winter R, Bajka M, Holzapfel GA. 2006. Mechanical properties of the human uterine cervix: an in vivo study. Med Image Anal. 10:125–136.10.1016/j.media.2005.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen JN, Burchette RJ. 2008. Outcome after anterior vaginal prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 111:891–898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panayi DC, Digesu GA, Tekkis P, Fernando R, Khullar V. 2010. Ultrasound measurement of vaginal wall thickness: a novel and reliable technique. Int Urogynecol J. 21:1265–1270.10.1007/s00192-010-1183-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peña E, Martins P, Mascarenhas T, Natal Jorge RM, Ferreira A, Doblaré M, Calvo B. 2011. Mechanical characterization of the softening behavior of human vaginal tissue. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 4:275–283.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peña E, Calvo B, Martínez MA, Doblaré M. 2007. An anisotropic visco-hyperelastic model for ligaments at finite strains. Formulation and computational aspects. Int J Solids Struct. 44:760–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petros PE, Woodman PJ. 2008. The Integral Theory of continence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. 19:35–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramanah R, Berger MB, Parratte BM, DeLancey JO. 2012. Anatomy and histology of apical support: a literature review concerning cardinal and uterosacral ligaments. Int Urogynecol J. 23:1483–1494.10.1007/s00192-012-1819-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao GV, Rubod C, Brieu M, Bhatnagar N, Cosson M. 2010. Experiments and finite element modelling for the study of prolapse in the pelvic floor system. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 13:349–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivaux G, Rubod C, Dedet B, Brieu M, Gabriel B, Cosson M. 2013. Comparative analysis of pelvic ligaments: a biomechanics study. Int Urogynecol J. 24:135–139.10.1007/s00192-012-1861-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooban N, Regli A, Davis WA, De Keulenaer BL. 2012. Comparing intra-abdominal pressures in different body positions via a urinary catheter and nasogastric tube: a pilot study. Ann Intensive Care. 2(Suppl 1), S11-5820-2-S1-S11. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubod C, Boukerrou M, Brieu M, Dubois P, Cosson M. 2007. Biomechanical properties of vaginal tissue. Part 1: new experimental protocol. J Urol. 178:320–325; discussion 325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubod C, Boukerrou M, Brieu M, Jean-Charles C, Dubois P, Cosson M. 2008. Biomechanical properties of vaginal tissue: preliminary results. Int Urogynecol J. 19:811–816.10.1007/s00192-007-0533-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubod C, Brieu M, Cosson M, Rivaux G, Clay JC, de Landsheere L, Gabriel B. 2012. Biomechanical properties of human pelvic organs. Urology. 79:968.e17–968.e22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelsson EC, Arne Victor FT, Tibblin G, Svärdsudd KF. 1999. Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 180:299–305.10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70203-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subak LL, Waetjen LE, van den Eeden S, Thom DH, Vittinghoff E, Brown JS. 2001. Cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 98:646–651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung Vivian W, Washington Blair, Raker Christina A. 2010. Costs of ambulatory care related to female pelvic floor disorders in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 202:483-e1–e7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swift SE, Herring M. 1998. Comparison of pelvic organ prolapse in the dorsal lithotomy compared with the standing position. Obstet Gynecol. 91:961–964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulikangas PK. 2005. Defect theory of pelvic organ prolapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 48:662–667.10.1097/01.grf.0000170429.83937.42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umutlu L, Kraff O, Fischer A, Kinner S, Maderwald S, Nassenstein K, Nensa F, Grüneisen J, Orzada S, Bitz AK, Forsting M, Ladd ME, Lauenstein TC. 2013. Seven-Tesla MRI of the female pelvis. Eur Radiol. 23:2364–2373.10.1007/s00330-013-2868-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usta A, Guzin K, Kanter M, Ozgül M, Usta CS. 2014. Expression of matrix metalloproteinase-1 in round ligament and uterosacral ligament tissue from women with pelvic organ prolapse. J Mol Histol. 45:275–281.10.1007/s10735-013-9550-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vardy MD, Gardner TR, Cosman F, Scotti RJ, Mikhail MS, Preiss-Bloom AO, Williams JK, Cline JM, Lindsay R. 2005. The effects of hormone replacement on the biomechanical properties of the uterosacral and round ligaments in the monkey model. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 192:1741–1751.10.1016/j.ajog.2004.10.639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss JA, Maakestad BJ. 2006. Permeability of human medial collateral ligament in compression transverse to the collagen fiber direction. J Biomech. 39:276–283.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.11.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yucel N, Usta A, Guzin K, Kanter M, Bilgic E, Ozel NO, Ozgul M. 2013. Immunohistochemical analysis of connective tissue in patients with pelvic organ prolapse. J Mol Histol. 44:97–102.10.1007/s10735-012-9456-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar