Haemodynamic assessment of human coronary arteries is affected by degree of freedom of artery movement

References

• Ambrose JA, Tannenbaum MA, Alexopoulos D, Hjemdahl-Monsen CE, Leavy J, Weiss M, Borrico S, Gorlin R, Fuster V. 1988. Angiographic progression of coronary artery disease and the development of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 12:56–62.10.1016/0735-1097(88)90356-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asakura T, Karino T. 1990. Flow patterns and spatial distribution of atherosclerotic lesions in human coronary arteries. Circ Res. 66:1045–1066.10.1161/01.RES.66.4.1045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beltrame JF. 2012. Coronary artery disease – current concepts in epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment. DD Gaze, editor. InTech. 10.5772/2448
   Google Scholar
• Chaichana T, Sun Z, Jewkes J. 2014. Impact of plaques in the left coronary artery on wall shear stress and pressure gradient in coronary side branches. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 17:108–118.10.1080/10255842.2012.671308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan KH, Chawantanpipat C, Gattorna T, Chantadansuwan T, Kirby A, Madden A, Keech A, Ng MK. 2010. The relationship between coronary stenosis severity and compression type coronary artery movement in acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 159:584–592.10.1016/j.ahj.2009.12.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einav S, Bluestein D. 2004. Dynamics of blood flow and platelet transport in pathological vessels. Ann N Y AcadSci. 1015:351–366.10.1196/annals.1302.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari M, Werner GS, Bahrmann P, Richartz BM, Figulla HR. 2006. Turbulent flow as a cause for underestimating coronary flow reserve measured by Doppler guide wire. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 4:14.10.1186/1476-7120-4-14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Friedman MH, Brinkman AM, Qin JJ, Seed WA. 1993. Relation between coronary artery geometry and the distribution of early sudanophilic lesions. Atherosclerosis. 98:193–199.10.1016/0021-9150(93)90128-H
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannoglou GD, Soulis JV, Farmakis TM, Giannakoulas GA, Parcharidis GE, Louridas GE. 2005. Wall pressure gradient in normal left coronary artery tree. Med Eng Phys. 27:455–464.10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.12.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giroud D, Li JM, Urban P, Meier B, Rutishauser W. 1992. Relation of the site of acute myocardial infarction to the most severe coronary arterial stenosis at prior angiography. Am J Cardiol. 69:729–732.10.1016/0002-9149(92)90495-K
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glagov S, Zarins C, Giddens DP, Ku DN. 1988. Hemodynamics and atherosclerosis. Insights and perspectives gained from studies of human arteries. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 112:1018–1031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan M, Rubenstein DA, Yin W. 2013. Effects of cyclic motion on coronary blood flow. J Biomech Eng. 135:121002.10.1115/1.4025335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzapfel GA, Ogden RW. 2006. Mechanics of biological tissue. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/3-540-31184-X
   Google Scholar
• Javadzadegan A, Yong AS, Chang M, Ng AC, Yiannikas J, Ng MK, Behnia M, Kritharides L. 2013. Flow recirculation zone length and shear rate are differentially affected by stenosis severity in human coronary arteries. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 304:H559–H566.10.1152/ajpheart.00428.2012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konta T, Bett JH. 2003. Patterns of coronary artery movement and the development of coronary atherosclerosis. Circ J. 67:846–850.10.1253/circj.67.846
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koshiba N, Ando J, Chen X, Hisada T. 2007. Multiphysics simulation of blood flow and LDL transport in a porohyperelastic arterial wall model. J Biomech Eng. 129:374–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little WC, Constantinescu M, Applegate RJ, Kutcher MA, Burrows MT, Kahl FR, Santamore WP. 1988. Can coronary angiography predict the site of a subsequent myocardial infarction in patients with mild-to-moderate coronary artery disease? Circulation. 78:1157–1166.10.1161/01.CIR.78.5.1157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu B, Zheng J, Bach R, Tang D. 2012. Correlations of coronary plaque wall thickness with wall pressure and wall pressure gradient: a representative case study. Biomed Eng Online. 11:43.10.1186/1475-925X-11-43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzini G, Casalena E. 2008. CFD analysis of pulsatile blood flow in an atherosclerotic human artery with eccentric plaques. J Biomech. 41:1862–1870.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.04.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malek AM, Alper SL, Izumo S. 1999. Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. JAMA. 282:2035–2042.10.1001/jama.282.21.2035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manoharan G, Ntalianis A, Muller O, Hamilos M, Sarno G, Melikian N, Vanderheyden M, Heyndrickx GR, Wyffels E, Wijns W, De Bruyne B. 2009. Severity of coronary arterial stenoses responsible for acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol. 103:1183–1188.10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.12.047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menter FR. 2013. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA. 32:1598–1605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menter FR, Langtry R, Völker S. 2006. Transition modelling for general purpose CFD codes. Flow Turbul Combust. 77:277–303.10.1007/s10494-006-9047-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongrain R, Cabau JR. 2006. Role of shear stress in atherosclerosis and restenosis after coronary stent implantation. Rev Esp Cardiol. 59:1–4.10.1157/13083641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore JE, Xu C, Glagov S, Zarins CK, Ku DN. 1999. Fluid wall shear stress measurements in a model of the human abdominal aorta: oscillatory behavior and relationship to atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 110:225–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris L, Fahy P, Stefanov F, Finn R. 2015. The effects that cardiac motion has on coronary hemodynamics and catheter trackability forces for the treatment of coronary artery disease: an in vitro assessment. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 6:430–449.10.1007/s13239-015-0241-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesbitt WS, Westein E, Tovar-Lopez FJ, Tolouei E, Mitchell A, Fu J, Carberry J, Fouras A, Jackson SP. 2009. A shear gradient-dependent platelet aggregation mechanism drives thrombus formation. Nat Med. 15:665–673.10.1038/nm.1955
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen EM, Oyre S, Agerbæk M, Kristensen IB, Ringgaard S, Boesiger P, Paaske WP. 1999. Distribution of early atherosclerotic lesions in the human abdominal aorta correlates with wall shear stress measured in vivo. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 18:328–333.10.1053/ejvs.1999.0913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perktold K, Peter RO, Resch M, Langs G. 1991. Pulsatile non-newtonian blood flow in three-dimensional carotid bifurcation models: a numerical study of flow phenomena under different bifurcation angles. J Biomed Eng. 13:507–515.10.1016/0141-5425(91)90100-L
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perktold K, Rappitsch G, Loew M, Kuban B, Friedman M. 1998. Validated computation of physiologic flow in a realistic coronary artery branch. J Biomech. 31:217–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petraco R, van de Hoef TP, Nijjer S, Sen S, van Lavieren MA, Foale RA, Meuwissen M, Broyd C, Echavarria-Pinto M, Foin N, et al. 2014. Baseline instantaneous wave-free ratio as a pressure-only estimation of underlying coronary flow reserve: results of the JUSTIFY-CFR Study (Joined Coronary Pressure and Flow Analysis to Determine Diagnostic Characteristics of Basal and Hyperemic Indices of Functional Lesion Severity-Coronary Flow Reserve). Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 7:492–502.10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.000926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, Siebert U, Ikeno F, Bornschein B, van’t Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrøm T, et al. 2010. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 56:177–184.10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu Y, Tarbell JM. 2000. Numerical simulation of pulsatile flow in a compliant curved tube model of a coronary artery. J Biomech Eng. 122:77–85.10.1115/1.429629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramaswamy SD, Vigmostad SC, Wahle A, Lai YG, Olszewski ME, Braddy KC, Brennan TM, Rossen JD, Sonka M, Chandran KB. 2004. Fluid dynamic analysis in a human left anterior descending coronary artery with arterial motion. Ann Biomed Eng. 32:1628–1641.10.1007/s10439-004-7816-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samady H, Eshtehardi P, McDaniel MC, Suo J, Dhawan SS, Maynard C, Timmins LH, Quyyumi AA, Giddens DP. 2011. Coronary artery wall shear stress is associated with progression and transformation of atherosclerotic plaque and arterial remodeling in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 124:779–788.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.021824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuurbiers JC, Lopez NG, Ligthart J, Gijsen FJ, Dijkstra J, Serruys PW, Van der Steen AF, Wentzel JJ. 2009. In vivo validation of CAAS QCA-3D coronary reconstruction using fusion of angiography and intravascular ultrasound (ANGUS). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 73:620–626.10.1002/ccd.v73:5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slager CJ, Wentzel JJ, Gijsen FJH, Schuurbiers JCH, van der Wal AC, Van der Steen AF, Serruys PW. 2005. The role of shear stress in the generation of rupture-prone vulnerable plaques. Nat Clin P Cardiovasc Med. 2:401–407.10.1038/ncpcardio0274
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Slager CJ, Wentzel JJ, Gijsen FJH, Thury A, Van der Wal AC, Schaar JA, Serruys PW. 2005. The role of shear stress in the destabilization of vulnerable plaques and related therapeutic implications. Nat ClinP Cardiovasc Med. 2:456–464.10.1038/ncpcardio0298
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stone PH, Coskun AU, Kinlay S, Clark ME, Sonka M, Wahle A, Ilegbusi OJ, Yeghiazarians Y, Popma JJ, et al. 2003. Effect of endothelial shear stress on the progression of coronary artery disease, vascular remodelling, and in-stent restenosis in humans: in vivo 6-month follow-up study. Circulation. 108:438–444.10.1161/01.CIR.0000080882.35274.AD
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone PH, Coskun AU, Kinlay S, Popma JJ, Sonka M, Wahle A, Yeghiazarians Y, Maynard C, Kuntz RE, Feldman CL. 2007. Regions of low endothelial shear stress are the sites where coronary plaque progresses and vascular remodelling occurs in humans: an in vivo serial study. Eur Heart J. 28:705–710.10.1093/eurheartj/ehl575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor C, Zairns TH. 1998. Finite element modelling of blood flow in arteries. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 158:155–196.10.1016/S0045-7825(98)80008-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theodorakakos A, Gavaises M, Andriotis A, Zifan A, Liatsis P, Pantos I, Efstathopoulos EP, Katritsis D. 2008. Simulation of cardiac motion on non-Newtonian, pulsating flow development in the human left anterior descending coronary artery. Phys Med Biol. 53(18):4875–4892.10.1088/0031-9155/53/18/002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torii R, Keegan J, Wood NB, Dowsey AW, Hughes AD, Yang GZ, Firmin DN, Mcg Thom SA, Xu XY. 2009. The effect of dynamic vessel motion on haemodynamic parameters in the right coronary artery: a combined MR and CFD study. Br J Radiol. 82:S24–S32.10.1259/bjr/62450556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torii R, Wood NB, Hadjiloizou N, Dowsey AW, Wright AR, Hughes AD, Davies J. 2009. Fluid–structure interaction analysis of a patient-specific right coronary artery with physiological velocity and pressure waveforms. Commun Numer Meth Eng. 25:565–580.10.1002/cnm.v25:5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yong ASC, Ng ACC, Brieger D, Lowe HC, Ng MKC, Kritharides L. 2011. Three-dimensional and two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and their prediction of reduced fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J. 32:345–353.10.1093/eurheartj/ehq259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng D, Boutsianis E, Ammann M, Boomsma K, Wildermuth S, Poulikakos D. 2008. A study on the compliance of a right coronary artery and its impact on wall shear stress. J Biomech Eng. 130:041014.10.1115/1.2937744
   Google Scholar
• Zeng D, Ding Z, Friedman MH, Ethier CR. 2003. Effects of cardiac motion on right coronary artery hemodynamics. Ann Biomed Eng. 31:420–429.10.1114/1.1560631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar