Virtual anatomical reconstruction of large acetabular bone defects using a statistical shape model

References

• Albrecht T, Lüthi M, Gerig T, Vetter T. 2013. Posterior shape models. Med Image Anal. 17:959–973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baauw M, van Hellemondt GG, van Hooff ML, Spruit M. 2015. The accuracy of positioning of a custom-made implant within a large acetabular defect at revision arthroplasty of the hip. Bone Joint J. 97:780–785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell AL, Pedersen DR, Brand RA. 1990. A comparison of the accuracy of several hip center location prediction methods. J Biomech. 23:617–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berend KR, Sporer SM, Sierra RJ, Glassman AH, Morris MJ. 2010. Achieving stability and lower-limb length in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surgery. 92:2737–2752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besl PJ, McKay ND. 1992. A method for registration of 3-d shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 14:239–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burden RL, Faires JD. 2010. Numerical analysis. In: Numerical analysis, The bisection algorithm, 9th ed., Vol. 2.1. Boston: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Cereatti A, Donati M, Camomilla V, Margheritini F, Cappozzo A. 2009. Hip joint centre location: an ex vivo study. J Biomech. 42:818–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chintalapani G, Ellingsen LM, Sadowsky O, Prince JL, Taylor RH. 2007. Statistical atlases of bone anatomy: Construction, iterative improvement and validation. 10th international conference Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention MICCAI 2007, Proceedings, part I. Brisbane, Australia, October 29--November 2, 2007, Springer; p. 499–506.
   Google Scholar
• Christie MJ, Barrington SA, Brinson MF, Ruhling ME, DeBoer DK. 2001. Bridging massive acetabular defects with the triflange cup: 2-to 9-year results. Clin Orthopaedics Relat Res. 393:216–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danckaers F, Huysmans T, Lacko D, Ledda A, Verwulgent S, Van S, Sijbers J. 2014. Correspondence preserving elastic surface registration with shape model prior. 22nd International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), 2014. Stockholm: IEEE; p. 2143–2148.
   Google Scholar
• Davies R. Taylor C 2008. Statistical models of shape: optimisation and evaluation, Springer Science & Business Media. Available from: https://www.books.google.be/books?id=Lk1dF-GXvwEC&printsec=frontcover\#v=onepage&q&f=false
   Google Scholar
• Frangi AF, Rueckert D, Schnabel JA, Niessen WJ. 2002. Automatic construction of multiple-object three-dimensional statistical shape models: application to cardiac modeling. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 21:1151–1166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelaude F, Clijmans T, Broos P, Lauwers B, Vander Sloten J. 2007. Computer-aided planning of reconstructive surgery of the innominate bone: automated correction proposals. Comput Aided Surgery. 12:286–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelaude F, Clijmans T, Delport H. 2011. Quantitative computerized assessment of the degree of acetabular bone deficiency: total radial acetabular bone loss (TrABL). Adv Orthopedics. Available from: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/aorth/2011/494382/cta/
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goodall C. 1991. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodological). 53:285–339.
   Google Scholar
• Gower JC. 1975. Generalized procrustes analysis. Psychometrika. 40:33–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimann T, Meinzer HP. 2009. Statistical shape models for 3d medical image segmentation: a review. Med Image Anal. 13:543–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalteis T, Handel M, Bthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Grifka J. 2006. Imageless navigation for insertion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: Is it as accurate as ct-based navigation? J Bone Joint Surgery British Volume. 88:163–167.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krol Z, Skadlubowicz P, Hefti F, Krieg AH. 2013. Virtual reconstruction of pelvic tumor defects based on a gender-specific statistical shape model. Comput Aided Surgery. 18:142–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamecker H. Wenckebach TH. Hege HC. 2006. Atlas-based 3d-shape reconstruction from x-ray images. Pattern Recognition, 2006, 18th International Conference on ICPR 2006, Vol. 1. Hong Kong: IEEE; p. 371–374.
   Google Scholar
• Longo JA, Friedman RJ. 2011. Surgical technique of FMP acetabular system. DJO Surgical Report no.
   Google Scholar
• Lorensen WE, Cline HE. 1987. Marching cubes: a high resolution 3d surface construction algorithm. ACM SIGGRAPH computer graphics, Vol. 21. Anaheim: ACM; p. 163–169.
   Google Scholar
• Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM. 1994. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty: A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty. 9:33–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seim H, Kainmueller D, Heller M, Lamecker H, Zachow S, Hege HC. 2008. Automatic segmentation of the Pelvic bones from CT data based on a statistical shape model. In: Botha C, Kindlmann G, Niessen W, Preim B, editors. Eurographics workshop on visual computing for biomedicine. Delft: The Eurographics Association.
   Google Scholar
• Standring S, Borley N. 2008. Gray’s anatomy: The anatomical basis of clinical practice. Gray’s Anatomy. 40th ed. London: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Styner MA, Rajamani KT, Nolte LP, Zsemlye G, Székely G, Taylor CJ, Davies RH. 2003. Evaluation of 3d correspondence methods for model building. Information processing in medical imaging. Ambleside: Springer; p. 63–75.
   Google Scholar
• Valette S, Chassery J, Prost R. 2008. Generic remeshing of 3d triangular meshes with metric-dependent discrete voronoi diagrams. IEEE Trans Visu Comp Grap. 14:369–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wind MA Jr, Swank ML, Sorger JI. 2013. Short-term results of a custom triflange acetabular component for massive acetabular bone loss in revision THA. Orthopedics. 36:e260–e265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wold S, Esbensen K, Geladi P. 1987. Principal component analysis. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems. 2:37–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokota F, Okada T, Takao M, Sugano N, Tada Y, Sato Y. 2009. Automated segmentation of the femur and pelvis from 3d CT data of diseased hip using hierarchical statistical shape model of joint structure. Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention MICCAI 2009. London: Springer; p. 811–818.
   Google Scholar
• Zachow S, Lamecker H, Elsholtz B, Stiller M. 2005. Reconstruction of mandibular dysplasia using a statistical 3d shape model. CARS 2005: Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Proceedings of the 19th International Congress and Exhibition, International congress series, Vol. 1281. Berlin: Elsevier; p. 1238–1243.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng G, Gollmer S, Schumann S, Dong X, Feilkas T, Gonzlez Ballester MA. 2009. A 2d/3d correspondence building method for reconstruction of a patient-specific 3d bone surface model using point distribution models and calibrated x-ray images. Med Image Anal. 13:883–899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar