Effect of body weight support variation on muscle activities during robot assisted gait: a dynamic simulation study

References

• Anderson FC, Pandy MG. 2003. Individual muscle contributions to support in normal walking. Gait Posture. 17:159–169.10.1016/S0966-6362(02)00073-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoyagi D, Ichinose WE, Harkema SJ, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Bobrow JE. 2007. A robot and control algorithm that can synchronously assist in naturalistic motion during body-weight-supported gait training following neurologic injury. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 15:387–400.10.1109/TNSRE.2007.903922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banala SK, Kim SH, Agrawal SK, Scholz JP. 2009. Robot Assisted gait training with active leg exoskeleton (ALEX). IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 17:2–8.10.1109/TNSRE.2008.2008280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo G, Joerg M, Schreie R, Dietz V. 2000. Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. J Rehabil Res Dev. 37:693–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz V, Müller R, Colombo G. 2002. Locomotor activity in spinal man: significance of afferent input from joint and load receptors. Brain. 125:2626–2634.10.1093/brain/awf273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris DP, Aagaard P, Simonsen EB, Farley CT, Dyhre-Poulsen P. 2001. Soleus H-reflex gain in humans walking and running under simulated reduced gravity. J Physiol. 530:167–180.10.1111/tjp.2001.530.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch L, Barbeau H, Arsenault B. 1991. Influence of body weight support on normal human gait: development of a gait retraining strategy. Phys Ther. 71:842–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey M, Colombo G, Vaglio M, Bucher R, Jörg M Riener R. 2006. A novel mechatronic body weight support system. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 14:311–321.10.1109/TNSRE.2006.881556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazzani F, Fadda A, Torre M, Macellari V. 2000. WARD: a pneumatic system for body weight relief in gait rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 8:506–513.10.1109/86.895954
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerritsen KGM, Van Den Bogert AJ, Nigg BM. 1995. Direct dynamics simulation of the impact phase in heel-toe running. J Biomech. 28:661–668.10.1016/0021-9290(94)00127-P
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geyer H, Herr H. 2010. A muscle-reflex model that encodes principles of legged mechanics produces human walking dynamics and muscle activities. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 18:263–273.10.1109/TNSRE.2010.2047592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkema SJ, Hurley SL, Patel UK, Requejo PS, Dobkin BH, Edgerton VR. 1997. Human lumbosacral spinal cord interprets loading during stepping. J Neurophysiol. 77:797–811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks J, Arnold A, Anderson F, Schwartz M, Delp S. 2007. The effect of excessive tibial torsion on the capacity of muscles to extend the hip and knee during single-limb stance. Gait Posture. 26:546–552.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidler J, Neckel N. Inverse-dynamics based assessment of gait using a robotic orthosis. In: Conference proceedings: ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Vol. 1; 2006. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society; p. 185–188.
   Google Scholar
• Hidler JM, Wall AE. 2005. Alterations in muscle activation patterns during robotic-assisted walking. Clin Biomech. 20:184–193.10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.09.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hof AL, Elzinga H, Grimmius W, Halbertsma JPK. 2002. Speed dependence of averaged EMG profiles in walking. Gait Posture. 16:78–86.10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00206-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain S. 2014. State-of-the-art robotic gait rehabilitation orthoses: design and control aspects. NeuroRehabilitation. 35:701–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain S, Xie SQ, Liu G. 2011. Robot assisted treadmill training: mechanisms and traning strategies. Med Eng Phys. 33:527–53310.1016/j.medengphy.2010.12.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain S, Xie SQ, Jamwal PK, Parsons J. 2012. An intrinsically compliant robotic orthosis for treadmill training. Med Eng Phys. 34:1448–1453.10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain S, Xie SQ, Jamwal PK. 2013a. Adaptive impedance control of a robotic orthosis for gait rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Cybern. 43:1025–1034.10.1109/TSMCB.2012.2222374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain S, Xie SQ, Jamwal PK. 2013b. Effect of cadence regulation on muscle activation patterns during robot-assisted gait: a dynamic simulation study. IEEE J Biomed Health Inf. 17:442–451.10.1109/TITB.2012.2226596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain S, Xie SQ, Jamwal PK. 2013c. Robust nonlinear control of an intrinsically compliant robotic gait training orthosis. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. 43:655–665.10.1109/TSMCA.2012.2207111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanenko YP, Grasso R, Macellari V, Lacquaniti F. 2002. Control of foot trajectory in human locomotion: role of ground contact forces in simulated reduced gravity. J Neurophysiol. 87:3070–3089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jezernik S, Colombo G, Morari M. 2004. Automatic gait-pattern adaptation algorithms for rehabilitation with a 4-DOF robotic orthosis. IEEE Trans Rob Autom. 20:574–582.10.1109/TRA.2004.825515
   Google Scholar
• Klarner T, Chan HK, Wakeling JM, Lam T. 2010. Patterns of muscle coordination vary with stride frequency during weight assisted treadmill walking. Gait Posture. 31:360–365.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moré JJ, Toraldo G. 1989. Algorithms for bound constrained quadratic programming problems. Numerische Mathematik. 55:377–400.10.1007/BF01396045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neckel ND, Blonien N, Nichols D, Hidler J. 2008. Abnormal joint torque patterns exhibited by chronic stroke subjects while walking with a prescribed physiological gait pattern. J NeuroEng Rehabil. 5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandy MG. 2001. Computer modeling and simulation of human movement. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 3:245–273.10.1146/annurev.bioeng.3.1.245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riener R, Lunenburger L, Jezernik S, Anderschitz M, Colombo G, Dietz V. 2005. Patient-cooperative strategies for robot-aided treadmill training: first experimental results. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 13:380–394.10.1109/TNSRE.2005.848628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele KM, Seth A, Hicks JL, Schwartz MS, Delp SL. 2010. Muscle contributions to support and progression during single-limb stance in crouch gait. J Biomech. 43:2099–2105.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinnen E, Baeyens JP, Hens G, Knaepen K, Beckwée D, Michielsen M, Clijsen R, Kerckhofs E. 2015a. Body weight support during robot-assisted walking: influence on the trunk and pelvis kinematics. NeuroRehabilitation. 36:81–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinnen E, Baeyens JP, Hens G, Knaepen K, Beckwée D, Michielsen M, Clijsen R, Kerckhofs E. 2015b. Robot-assisted walking with the Lokomat: the influence of different levels of guidance force on thorax and pelvis kinematics. Clin Biomech. 30:254–259.10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinnen E, Baeyens JP, Hens G, Knaepen K, Beckwée D, Michielsen M, Clijsen R, Kerckhofs E. 2015c. Walking with robot assistance: the influence of body weight support on the trunk and pelvis kinematics. Disability Rehabil Assistive Technol. 10:252–257.10.3109/17483107.2014.888487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueda J, Ming D, Krishnamoorthy V, Shinohara M, and Ogasawara T. 2010. Individual muscle control using an exoskeleton robot for muscle function testing. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 18:339–350.10.1109/TNSRE.2010.2047116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kammen K, Boonstra A, Reinders-Messelink H, den Otter R. 2014. The combined effects of body weight support and gait speed on gait related muscle activity: a comparison between walking in the lokomat exoskeleton and regular treadmill walking. PLoS One. 9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kammen K, Boonstra AM, van der Woude LH, Reinders-Messelink HA, den Otter R. 2016. The combined effects of guidance force, bodyweight support and gait speed on muscle activity during able-bodied walking in the Lokomat. Clin Biomech. 36:65–73.10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.04.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veneman JF, Kruidhof R, Hekman EE, Ekkelenkamp R, Van Asseldonk EH, Van Der Kooij H. 2007. Design and evaluation of the LOPES exoskeleton robot for interactive gait rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 15:379–386.10.1109/TNSRE.2007.903919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter DA. 1991. The biomechanics and motor control of human gait: normal, elderly and pathological. 2nd ed. Waterloo: University of Waterloo Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi GT. 2001. Dynamic modeling of musculoskeletal motion – a vectorized approach for biomechanical analysis in three dimensions. 1st ed. US: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zajac FE. 2002. Understanding muscle coordination of the human leg with dynamical simulations. J Biomech. 35:1011–1018.10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00046-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajac FE, Neptune RR, Kautz SA. 2002. Biomechanics and muscle coordination of human walking: part I: introduction to concepts, power transfer, dynamics and simulations. Gait Posture. 16:215–232.10.1016/S0966-6362(02)00068-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajac FE, Neptune RR, Kautz SA. 2003. Biomechanics and muscle coordination of human walking: part II: lessons from dynamical simulations and clinical implications. Gait Posture. 17:1–17.10.1016/S0966-6362(02)00069-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar