Finite element analysis of implant-supported prosthesis with pontic and cantilever in the posterior maxilla

References

• Akca K, Iplikcioglu H. 2002. Finite element stress analysis of the effect of short implant usage in place of cantilever extensions in mandibular posterior edentulism. J Oral Rehabil. 29:350–356.10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00872.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alencar SM, Nogueira LB, Leal de Moura W, Rubo JH, de Oliveira Silva TS, Martins GA, Moura CD. 2015. FEA of peri-implant stresses in fixed partial denture prostheses with cantilevers. J Prosthodont. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12384
   Google Scholar
• Caneva M, Lang NP, Calvo Guirado JL, Spriano S, Iezzi G, Botticelli D. 2015. Bone healing at bicortically installed implants with different surface configurations. An experimental study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res. 26:293–299.10.1111/clr.2015.26.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen XY, Zhang CY, Nie EM, Zhang MC. 2012. Treatment planning of implants when 3 mandibular posterior teeth are missing: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Implant Dent. 21:340–343.10.1097/ID.0b013e31825cbc67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost HM. 2003. Bone's mechanostat: a 2003 update. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 275A:1081–1101.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0185
   Google Scholar
• Fu JH, Hsu YT, Wang HL. 2012. Identifying occlusal overload and how to deal with it to avoid marginal bone loss around implants. Eur J Oral Implantol. 5(Suppl):S91–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goiato MC, dos Santos DM, Santiago JF Jr, Moreno A, Pellizzer EP. 2014. Longevity of dental implants in type IV bone: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 43:1108–1116.10.1016/j.ijom.2014.02.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harder S, Wolfart S, Egert C, Kern M. 2011. Three-year clinical outcome of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures – Results of preliminary prospective study. J Dent. 39:656–661.10.1016/j.jdent.2011.07.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan I, Bourauel C, Keilig L, Reimann S, Heinemann F. 2011. The influence of implant number and abutment design on the biomechanical behaviour of bone for an implant-supported fixed prosthesis: a finite element study in the upper anterior region. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 14:1113–1116.10.1080/10255842.2010.515212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreissl ME, Gerds T, Muche R, Heydecke G, Strub JR. 2007. Technical complications of implant-supported fixed partial dentures in partially edentulous cases after an average observation period of 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 18:720–726.10.1111/clr.2007.18.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lekholm U, Zarb G. 1985. Patient selection and preparation Tissue-integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago (IL): Quintessence Inc.; p. 199–209.
   Google Scholar
• Lemos CA, Ferro-Alves ML, Okamoto R, Mendonça MR, Pellizzer EP. 2016. Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 47:8–17.10.1016/j.jdent.2016.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limbert G, van Lierde C, Muraru OL, Walboomers XF, Frank M, Hansson S, Middleton J, Jaecques S. 2010. Trabecular bone strains around a dental implant and associated micromotions – A micro-CT-based three-dimensional finite element study. J Biomech. 43:1251–1261.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milinkovic I, Cordaro L. 2014. Are there specific indications for the different alveolar bone augmentation procedures for implant placement? A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 43:606–625.10.1016/j.ijom.2013.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellizzer EP, de Mello CC, Santiago Junior JF, de Souza Batista VE, de Faria Almeida DA, Verri FR. 2015. Analysis of the biomechanical behavior of short implants: the photo-elasticity method. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 55:187–192.10.1016/j.msec.2015.05.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington J, Parker S. 2012. Improving quality of life using removable and fixed implant prostheses. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 33:268–270, 272:274–266.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Puri N, Pradhan KL, Chandna A, Sehgal V, Gupta R. 2007. Biometric study of tooth size in normal, crowded, and spaced permanent dentitions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 132:279.e277–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos Verri F, Santiago Junior JF, de Faria Almeida DA, de Oliveira GB, de Souza Batista VE, Marques Honório H, Yoshito Noritomi PY, Piza Pellizzer EP. 2015. Biomechanical influence of crown-to-implant ratio on stress distribution over internal hexagon short implant: 3-D finite element analysis with statistical test. J Biomech. 48:138–145.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.10.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sallam H, Kheiralla LS, Aldawakly A. 2012. Microstrains around standard and mini implants supporting different bridge designs. J Oral Implantol. 38:221–229.10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santiago JFJ, Verri FR, Almeida DA, de Souza Batista VE, Lemos CA, Pellizzer EP. 2016. Finite element analysis on influence of implant surface treatments, connection and bone types. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 63:292–300.10.1016/j.msec.2016.02.061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevimay M, Turhan F, Kiliçarslan MA, Eskitascioglu G. 2005. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown. J Prosthet Dent. 93:227–234.10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.12.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torcato LB, Pellizzer EP, Verri FR, Falcón-Antenucci RM, Batista VE, Lopes LF. 2014. Effect of the parafunctional occlusal loading and crown height on stress distribution. Braz Dent J. 25:554–560.10.1590/0103-6440201300144
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Staden RC, Guan H, Loo YC. 2006. Application of the finite element method in dental implant research. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 9:257–270.
   Google Scholar
• Verri FR, Batista VE, Santiago JF Jr, Almeida DA, Pellizzer EP. 2014. Effect of crown-to-implant ratio on peri-implant stress: a finite element analysis. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 45:234–240.10.1016/j.msec.2014.09.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verri FR, Cruz RS, de Souza Batista VE, Almeida DA, Verri AC, Lemos CA, Santiago Júnior JF, Pellizzer EP. 2016. Can the modeling for simplification of a dental implant surface affect the accuracy of 3D finite element analysis? Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 19:1665–1672.10.1080/10255842.2016.1176156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verri FR, Cruz RS, Lemos CA, de Souza Batista VE, Almeida DA, Verri AC, Pellizzer EP. 2017. Influence of bicortical techniques in internal connection placed in premaxillary area by 3D finite element analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 20:193–200.10.1080/10255842.2016.1209188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokoyama S, Wakabayashi N, Shiota M, Ohyama T. 2004. The influence of implant location and length on stress distribution for three-unit implant-supported posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 91:234–240.10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.12.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar