275
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

3D characterisation of the dynamics of foot joints of adults during walking. Gait pattern identification

, , &
Pages 1015-1030 | Received 01 Nov 2016, Accepted 13 May 2017, Published online: 19 May 2017

References

  • Bruening DA, Cooney KM, Buczek FL. 2012a. Analysis of a kinetic multi-segment foot model. Part I: model repeatability and kinematic validity. Gait Posture. 35:529–534.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.10.363
  • Bruening DA, Cooney KM, Buczek FL. 2012b. Analysis of a kinetic multi-segment foot model part II: kinetics and clinical implications. Gait Posture. 35:535–540.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.11.012
  • Buldt AK, Levinger P, Murley GS, Menz HB, Nester CJ, Landorf KB. 2015. Foot posture is associated with kinematics of the foot during gait: a comparison of normal, planus and cavus feet. Gait Posture. 42, 42–48.
  • Chiu M-C, Wang M-J. 2007. The effect of gait speed and gender on perceived exertion, muscle activity, joint motion of lower extremity, ground reaction force and heart rate during normal walking. Gait Posture. 25:385–392.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.05.008
  • Cho SH, Park JM, Kwon OY. 2004. Gender differences in three dimensional gait analysis data from 98 healthy Korean adults. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 19:145–152.10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2003.10.003
  • Crenna P, Frigo C. 2011. Dynamics of the ankle joint analyzed through moment–angle loops during human walking: gender and age effects. Hum Mov Sci. 30:1185–1198.10.1016/j.humov.2011.02.009
  • Davis RB, DeLuca PA. 1996. Gait characterization via dynamic joint stiffness. Gait Posture. 4:224–231.10.1016/0966-6362(95)01045-9
  • Dixon PC, Böhm H, Döderlein L. 2012. Ankle and midfoot kinetics during normal gait: a multi-segment approach. J Biomech. 45:1011–1016.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.01.001
  • Grood ES, Suntay WJ. 1983. A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng. 105:136–144.10.1115/1.3138397
  • Huber PJ, Ronchetti EM. 2009. Robust statistics. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.10.1002/SERIES1345
  • Hunt AE, Smith RM. 2004. Mechanics and control of the flat versus normal foot during the stance phase of walking. Clin Biomech. 19:391–397.10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2003.12.010
  • Hunt AE, Smith RM, Torode M. 2001. Extrinsic muscle activity, foot motion and ankle joint moments during the stance phase of walking. Foot Ankle Int/Am Orthop Foot Ankle Soc [and] Swiss Foot Ankle Soc. 22:31–41.10.1177/107110070102200105
  • Kirby KA. 2000. Biomechanics of the normal and abnormal foot. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 90:30–34.10.7547/87507315-90-1-30
  • Kirby KA. 2002. Biomechanics of funcional hallux limitus. In: Foot and lower extremity biomechanics II: precision intricast newsletters. Payson, AZ: Precision Intricast; p. 141–149.
  • Kirby KA. 2008. Relatioship between Achilles tendon and plantar fascia tension. In: Foot and lower extremity biomechanics II: precision intricast newsletters. Payson, AZ: Precision Intricast; p. 100–101.
  • Leardini A, Benedetti MG, Berti L, Bettinelli D, Nativo R, Giannini S. 2007. Rear-foot, mid-foot and fore-foot motion during the stance phase of gait. Gait Posture. 25:453–462.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.05.017
  • Lin YC, Yang BS, Lin YT, Yang YT. 2011. Human recognition based on kinematics and kinetics of gait. J Med Biol Eng. 31:255–263.10.5405/jmbe.806
  • Maceira E, Monteagudo M. 2014. Functional hallux rigidus and the Achilles-calcaneus-plantar system. Foot Ankle Clin. 19:669–699.10.1016/j.fcl.2014.08.006
  • MacWilliams BA, Cowley M, Nicholson DE. 2003. Foot kinematics and kinetics during adolescent gait. Gait Posture. 17:214–224.10.1016/S0966-6362(02)00103-0
  • Nester CJ, Jarvis HL, Jones RK, Bowden PD, Liu A. 2014. Movement of the human foot in 100 pain free individuals aged 18–45: implications for understanding normal foot function. J Foot Ankle Res. 7:51.
  • Pascual Huerta J. 2014. The effect of the gastrocnemius on the plantar fascia. Foot Ankle Clin. 19:701–718.10.1016/j.fcl.2014.08.011
  • Powers CM. 2003. The influence of altered lower-extremity kinematics on patellofemoral joint dysfunction: a theoretical perspective. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 33:639–646.10.2519/jospt.2003.33.11.639
  • Queen RM, De Biasio JC, Butler RJ, DeOrio JK, Easley ME, Nunley JA. 2012. J. Leonard Goldner Award 2011: changes in pain, function, and gait mechanics two years following total ankle arthroplasty performed with two modern fixed-bearing prostheses. Foot Ankle Int. 33:535–542.10.3113/FAI.2012.0535
  • Queen RM, Sparling TL, Butler RJ, Adams SB, DeOrio JK, Easley ME, Nunley JA. 2014. Patient-reported outcomes, function, and gait mechanics after fixed and mobile-bearing total ankle replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 96:987–993.10.2106/JBJS.M.00971
  • Redmond AC, Crosbie J, Ouvrier RA. 2006. Development and validation of a novel rating system for scoring standing foot posture: the Foot Posture Index. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 21:89–98.10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.08.002
  • Rouhani H, Favre J, Crevoisier X, Aminian K. 2012. Measurement of multi-segment foot joint angles during gait using a wearable system. J Biomech Eng. 134:061006.
  • Rouhani H, Favre J, Crevoisier X, Aminian K. 2014. A wearable system for multi-segment foot kinetics measurement. J Biomech. 47:1704–1711.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.02.027
  • Rousseeuw PJ, Croux C. 2012. Alternatives to the median absolute deviation. J Am Stat Assoc. 88:1273–1283.
  • Saraswat P, MacWilliams BA, Davis RB, D’Astous JL. 2014. Kinematics and kinetics of normal and planovalgus feet during walking. Gait Posture. 39:339–345.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.08.003
  • Shamaei K, Sawicki GS, Dollar AM. 2013. Estimation of quasi-stiffness and propulsive work of the human ankle in the stance phase of walking. PLoS One. 8:e89935.
  • Simonsen EB, Alkjær T. 2012. The variability problem of normal human walking. Med Eng Phys. 34:219–224.10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.07.013
  • Singer S, Klejman S, Pinsker E, Houck J, Daniels T. 2013. Ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis: gait analysis compared with normal controls. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 95:e191(1–10).
  • Söderkvist I, Wedin PA. 1993. Determining the movements of the skeleton using well-configured markers. J Biomech. 26:1473–1477.10.1016/0021-9290(93)90098-Y

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.