Model reduction methodology for computational simulations of endovascular repair

References

• Acosta V, Miranda JC. 2005. Towards the development of a methodology for the optimization of the metal cutting process in multiedge tools from data collected with single edge tools. Manuf Eng Mater Handl Parts A B. 2005:683–689.
   Google Scholar
• Auricchio F, Conti M, Marconi S, Reali A, Tolenaar JL, Trimarchi S. 2013. Patient-specific aortic endografting simulation: from diagnosis to prediction. Comput Biol Med. 43(4):386–394.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2013.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auricchio F, Conti M, Lefieux A, Morganti S, Reali A, Sardanelli F, Secchi F, Trimarchi S, Veneziani A. 2014. Patient-specific analysis of post-operative aortic hemodynamics: a focus on thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR). Comput Mech. 54(4):943–953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capelli C, Taylor AM, Migliavacca F, Bonhoeffer P, Schievano S. 2010. Patient-specific reconstructed anatomies and computer simulations are fundamental for selecting medical device treatment: application to a new percutaneous pulmonary valve. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 368(1921):3027–3038.10.1098/rsta.2010.0088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charbonneau C, Gautrot JE, Hébert MJ, Zhu XX, Lerouge S. 2007. Chondroitin-4-sulfate: a bioactive macromolecule to foster vascular healing around stent-grafts after endovascular aneurysm repair. Macromol Biosci. 7:746–752.10.1002/(ISSN)1616-5195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen D, Müller-Eschner M, Rengier F, Kotelis D, Böckler D, Ventikos Y, Xu Y, Zeng Y, Peng Y, Von Tengg-Kobligk H. 2013. A preliminary study of fast virtual stent-graft deployment: application to stanford type b aortic dissection. Int J Adv Robot Syst. 10:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dar FH, Meakin JR, Aspden RM. 2002. Statistical methods in finite element analysis. J Biomech. 35(9):1155–1161.10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00085-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bock S, Iannaccone F, De Santis G, De Beule M, Van Loo D, Devos D, Vermassen F, Segers P, Verhegghe B. 2012. Virtual evaluation of stent graft deployment: A validated modeling and simulation study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 13:129–139.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.04.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demanget N, Latil P, Orgéas L, Badel P, Avril S, Geindreau C, Albertini J-N, Favre J-P. 2012. Severe bending of two aortic stent-grafts: an experimental and numerical mechanical analysis. Ann Biomed Eng. 40(12):2674–2686.10.1007/s10439-012-0618-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demanget N, Avril S, Badel P, Orgéas L, Geindreau C, Albertini J-N, Favre J-P. 2012. Computational comparison of the bending behavior of aortic stent-grafts. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 5:272–82.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demanget N, Duprey A, Badel P, Orgéas L, Avril S, Geindreau C, Albertini J-N, Favre J-P. 2013. Finite element analysis of the mechanical performances of 8 marketed aortic stent-grafts. J Endovasc Ther. 20(4):523–535.10.1583/12-4063.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon-Murphy D, Noorani1 A, Nordsletten D, Figueroa CA. 2016. Multi-modality image-based computational analysis of haemodynamics in aortic dissection. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 15:857–876.10.1007/s10237-015-0729-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Escalera FM, Zeballos S, Santamaría Acosta VA, Jimenez MA, Rodriguez Pons R. 2014. Application of robust design techniques to calibration of cohesive models for modelling fracture of aluminium 7475. An Mecánica la Fract. 31:159–168.
   Google Scholar
• Gervaso F, Capelli C, Petrini L, Lattanzio S, Di Virgilio L, Migliavacca F. 2008. On the effects of different strategies in modelling balloon-expandable stenting by means of finite element method. J Biomech. 41:1206–1212.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.01.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guivier-Curien C, Deplano V, Bertrand E, DominiqueSingland J, Koskas F. 2009. Analysis of blood flow behaviour in custom stent grafts. J Biomech. 42(11):1754–1761.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.03.053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu W-H, Chao C-K, Hsu H-C, Lin J, Hsu C-C. 2009. Parametric study on the interface pullout strength of the vertebral body replacement cage using FEM-based Taguchi methods. Med Eng Phys. 31(3):287–294.10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahanshahi M, Sanati MH, Babaei Z. 2008. Optimization of parameters for the fabrication of gelatin nanoparticles by the Taguchi robust design method. J Appl Stat. 35(12):1345–1353.10.1080/02664760802382426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lally C, Dolan F, Prendergast PJ. 2005. Cardiovascular stent design and vessel stresses: a finite element analysis. J Biomech. 38:1574–1581.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.07.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrabide I, Kim M, Augsburger L, Villa-Uriol MC, Rüfenacht D, Frangi AF. 2012. Fast virtual deployment of self-expandable stents: Method and in vitro evaluation for intracranial aneurysmal stenting. Med Image Anal. 16(3):721–730.10.1016/j.media.2010.04.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Kleinstreuer C. 2006. Analysis of biomechanical factors affecting stent-graft migration in an abdominal aortic aneurysm model. J Biomech. 39(12):2264–2273.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.07.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Migliavacca F, Petrini L, Colombo M, Auricchio F, Pietrabissa R. 2002. Mechanical behavior of coronary stents investigated through the finite element method. J Biomech. 35:803–811.10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00033-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel VI. 2011. Long-term survival after open repair and thoracic endovascular aortic repair for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. Circulation. 124(24):2645–2646.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.069641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrin D, Demanget N, Badel P, Avril S, Orgéas L, Geindreau C, Albertini J-N. 2015. Deployment of stent grafts in curved aneurysmal arteries: toward a predictive numerical tool. Int J Numer Method Biomed eng. e02698:26–36.
   Google Scholar
• Perrin D, Badel P, Orgéas L, Geindreau C, Dumenil A, Albertini J-N, Avril S. 2015. Patient-specific numerical simulation of stent-graft deployment: validation on three clinical cases. J Biomech. 48(10):1868–1875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrin D, Badel P, Orgeas L, Geindreau C, Rolland du Roscoat S, Albertini JN, Avril S. 2016. Patient-specific simulation of endovascular repair surgery with tortuous aneurysms requiring flexible stent-grafts. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 63:86–99.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.06.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz E, Holfeld J, Czerny M, Langs G. 2012. Visualizing changes in vessel wall dynamics due to stent-grafting in the aortic arch. Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), 2012 9th IEEE International Symposium on, IEEE; p. 788–791.10.1109/ISBI.2012.6235666
   Google Scholar
• Simulia Dassault Systems Corp. 2015. Abaqus 614 documentation.
   Google Scholar
• Spranger K, Capelli C, Bosi GM, Schievano S, Ventikos Y. 2015. Comparison and calibration of a real-time virtual stenting algorithm using Finite Element Analysis and Genetic Algorithms. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 293:462–480.10.1016/j.cma.2015.03.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trabelsi O, López Villalobos JL, Ginel A, Cortes EB, Doblaré M. 2012. A pre-operative planning for endoprosthetic human tracheal implantation: a decision support system based on robust design of experiments. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering:1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia Z, Ju F, Sasaki K. 2007. A general finite element analysis method for balloon expandable stents based on repeated unit cell (RUC) model. Finite Elem Anal Des. 43:649–658.10.1016/j.finel.2007.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarins CK, Taylor CA. 2009. Endovascular device design in the future: transformation from trial and error to computational design. J Endovasc Ther. 16(Suppl 1):I12–I21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar