A three-dimensional topology optimization model for tooth-root morphology

References

• Andrade-Campos A, Ramos A, Simoes J. 2012. A model of bone adaptation as a topology optimization process with contact. J Biomed Sci Eng. 5:229–244.10.4236/jbise.2012.55030
   Google Scholar
• Andreassen E, Clausen A, Schevenels M, Lazarov BS, Sigmund O. 2001. Efficient topology optimization in MATLAB using 88 lines of code. Struct Multidisc Optim 43(1):1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner A, Harzheim L, Mattheck C. 1992. SKO (soft kill option): the biological way to find an optimum structure topology. Int J Fatigue. 14(6):387–393.10.1016/0142-1123(92)90226-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendsøe M. 1989. Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Struct Optim. 1(4):193–202.10.1007/BF01650949
   Google Scholar
• Bendsøe M, Sigmund O. 2003. Topology optimization: Theory, methods, and applications. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns TE, Tortorelli DA. 2001. Topology optimization of non-linear elastic structures and compliant mechanisms. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg. 190(26–27):3443–3459.10.1016/S0045-7825(00)00278-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunski JB. 1999. In Vivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone/dental-implant interface. Adv Dent Res. 13:99–119.10.1177/08959374990130012301
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buschang PH, Julien K, Sachdeva R, Demirjian A. 1992. Childhood and pubertal growth changes of the human symphysis. Angle Orthod. 62(3):203–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang CL, Chen CS, Huang CH, Hsu ML. 2012. Finite element analysis of the dental implant using a topology optimization method. Med Eng Phys. 34(7):999–1008.10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng YC, Lin DH, Jiang CP, Lin YM. 2017. Dental implant customization using numerical optimization design and 3-dimensional printing fabrication of zirconia ceramic. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng. 33 (5). DOI:10.1002/cnm.2820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi AH, Conway RC, Ben-Nissan B. 2014. Finite-element modeling and analysis in nanomedicine and dentistry. Nanomed. 9(11):1681–1695.10.2217/nnm.14.75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dìaz A, Sigmund O. 1995. Checkerboard patterns in layout optimization: structural optimization. Struct Optim. 19(1):40–45.
   Google Scholar
• Farah JW, Craig RG, Meroueh KA. 1989. Finite element analysis of three- and four-unit bridges. J Oral Rehabil. 16(6):603–611.10.1111/jor.1989.16.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo X, Zhang W, Zhong W. 2014. Doing topology optimization explicitly and geometrically – a new moving morphable components based framework. J Appl Mech. 81(8):081009.10.1115/1.4027609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo X, Zhang W, Zhang J, Yuan J. 2016. Explicit structural topology optimization based on moving morphable components (MMC) with curved skeletons. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng. 310:711–748.10.1016/j.cma.2016.07.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harzheim L. 2008. Strukturoptimierung: Grundlagen und Anwendungen [Structural optimization: basics and applications]. 1st ed. Frankfurt: Harri Deutsch. Deutsch.
   Google Scholar
• Harzheim L, Graf G. 2006. A review of optimization of cast parts using topology optimization. Struct Multidiscipl Optim. 31(5):388–399.10.1007/s00158-005-0554-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasegawa A, Shinya A, Nakasone Y, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK, Shinya A. 2010. Development of 3D CAD/FEM analysis system for natural teeth and jaw bone constructed from X-ray CT images. Intern J Biomater. 2010. DOI:10.1155/2010/659802
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koca OL, Eskitascioglu G, Usumez A. 2005. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of functional stresses in different bone locations produced by implants placed in the maxillary posterior region of the sinus floor. J Prosthet Dent. 93(1):38–44.10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li T, Hu K, Cheng L, Ding Y, Ding Y, Shao J, Kong L. 2010. Optimum selection of the dental implant diameter and length in the posterior mandible with poor bone quality – A 3D finite element analysis. Appl Math Model. 35(1):446–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu K, Tovar A. 2014. An efficient 3d topology optimization code written in matlab. Struct Multidiscipl Optim. 50(6):1175–1196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez Choy SE, Lenz J, Schweizerhof K, Schmittmer M, Schindler HJ. 2017. Realistic kinetic loading of the jaw system during single chewing cycles: a finite element study. J Oral Rehab. 44(5):375–384.10.1111/joor.2017.44.issue-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattheck C. 1990. Design and growth rules for biological structures and their application to engineering. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 13(5):535–550.10.1111/ffe.1990.13.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer HJ, Kuiper JH, Starmans FJ, Bosman F. 1992. Stress distribution around dental implants: Influence of superstructure, length of implants, and height of mandible. J Prosthet Dent. 68(1):96–102.10.1016/0022-3913(92)90293-J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murakami N, Wakabayashi N. 2014. Finite element contact analysis as a critical technique in dental biomechanics: A review. J Prosthodont Res. 58(2):92–101.10.1016/j.jpor.2014.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nutu E. 2015. Interpretation of parameters in strain energy density bone adaptation equation when applied to topology optimization of inert structures. Mechanika. 21(6):443–449.
   Google Scholar
• Pucker T, Grabe J. 2011. Structural optimization in geotechnical engineering: basics and application. Acta Geotechnic. 6:41–49.10.1007/s11440-011-0134-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Querin OM, Steven GP, Xie YM. 1998. Evolutionary structural optimization (ESO) using a bi-directional algorithm. Eng Comput. 15:1031–1048.10.1108/02644409810244129
   Google Scholar
• Rozvany GIN. 2009. A critical review of established methods of structural topology optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim. 37:217–237.10.1007/s00158-007-0217-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seitz K, Grabe J. 2016. Three-dimensional topology optimization for geotechnical foundations in granular soil. Comput Geotech. 80:41–48.10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi L, Li H, Fok AS, Ucer C, Devlin H, Horner K. 2007. Shape optimization of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 22(6):911–920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigmund O. 1997. On the design of compliant mechanisms using topology optimization. Mech Struct Mach. 25(4):493–524.10.1080/08905459708945415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigmund O. 2001. A 99 line topology optimization code written in Matlab. Struct Multidisc Optim. 21(2):120–127.10.1007/s001580050176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigmund O, Petersson J. 1998. Numerical instabilities in topology optimization: a survey on procedures dealing with checkerboards, mesh-dependencies and local minima. Struct Optim. 16(1):68–75.10.1007/BF01214002
   Google Scholar
• Van Staden RC, Guan H, Loo YC. 2006. Application of the finite element method in dental implant research. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 9(4):257–270.10.1080/10255840600837074
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolff  J.  1892. Das Gesetz der Transformation von Knochen [The law of bone remodelling]. Berlin: Springer. Deutsch.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon Y, Sun X, Huang J, Hou G, Rechowicz K, McKenzie F. 2013. Designing natural-tooth-shaped dental implants based on soft-kill option optimization. Computer-Aided Des Appl. 10(1):59–72.10.3722/cadaps.2013.59-72
   Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Yang W, Zhou J, Li D, Guo X. 2017. Structural Topology Optimization Through Explicit Boundary Evolution. J Appl Mech. 84(1):11011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Chen J, Zhu X, Zhou J, Xue D, Lei X, Guo X. 2017. Explicit three dimensional topology optimization via moving Morphable void (MMV) approach. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng. 322:590–614.10.1016/j.cma.2017.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou M, Rozvany G. 1991. The COC algorithm, Part II: Topological, geometrical and generalized shape optimization. Comp Methods Appl Mech Eng. 89(1–3):309–336.10.1016/0045-7825(91)90046-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar