Computational biomechanical analysis of postoperative inferior tibiofibular syndesmosis: a modified modeling method

References

• Anderson AE, Ellis BJ, Maas SA, Peters CL, Weiss JA. 2008. Validation of finite element predictions of cartilage contact pressure in the human hip joint. J Biomech Eng. 130:051008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beumer A, Campo MM, Niesing R, Day J, Kleinrensink GJ, Swierstra BA. 2005. Screw fixation of the syndesmosis: a cadaver model comparing stainless steel and titanium screws and three and four cortical fixation. Injury. 36:60–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beumer A, Valstar ER, Garling EH, Niesing R, Ginai AZ, Ranstam J, Swierstra BA. 2006. Effects of ligament sectioning on the kinematics of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: a radiostereometric study of 10 cadaveric specimens based on presumed trauma mechanisms with suggestions for treatment. Acta Orthop. 77:531–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Qiang M, Zhang K, Li H, Dai H. 2015. Novel computer-assisted preoperative planning system for humeral shaft fractures: report of 43 cases. Int J Med Robot. 11:109–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Zhang K, Qiang M, Li H, Dai H. 2014. Computer-assisted preoperative planning for proximal humeral fractures by minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis. Chin Med J. 127:3278–3285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung JT, Zhang M, Leung AK, Fan YB. 2005. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the foot during standing–a material sensitivity study. J Biomech. 38:1045–1054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottom JM, Hyer CF, Philbin TM, Berlet GC. 2009. Transosseous fixation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: comparison of an interosseous suture and endobutton to traditional screw fixation in 50 cases. J Foot Ankle Surg. 48:620–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis MJ, Michelson JD, Urquhart MW, Byank RP, Jinnah RH. 1992. Tibiotalar contact and fibular malunion in ankle fractures. A cadaver study. Acta Orthop Scand. 63:326–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolzynski M, Latosiewicz R. 1998. Rotatory instability of the ankle: an experimental investigation of tibio-fibular syndesmosis function. Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol. 63:451–454.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Egol KA, Pahk B, Walsh M, Tejwani NC, Davidovitch RI, Koval KJ. 2010. Outcome after unstable ankle fracture: effect of syndesmotic stabilization. J Orthop Trauma. 24:7–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner R, Yousri T, Holmes F, Clark D, Pollintine P, Miles AW, Jackson M. 2013. Stabilization of the syndesmosis in the Maisonneuve fracture-a biomechanical study comparing 2-hole locking plate and quadricortical screw fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 27:212–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gefen A, Megido-Ravid M, Itzchak Y, Arcan M. 2000. Biomechanical analysis of the three-dimensional foot structure during gait: a basic tool for clinical applications. J Biomech Eng. 122:630–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper MC. 1990. Mechanical considerations for the syndesmosis screw. A cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 72:1575–1576.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Helfet DL, Haas NP, Schatzker J, Matter P, Moser R, Hanson B. 2003. AO philosophy and principles of fracture management-its evolution and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 85-A:1156–1160.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoefnagels EM, Waites MD, Wing ID, Belkoff SM, Swierstra BA. 2007. Biomechanical comparison of the interosseous tibiofibular ligament and the anterior tibiofibular ligament. Foot Ankle Int. 28:602–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoiness P, Stromsoe K. 2004. Tricortical versus quadricortical syndesmosis fixation in ankle fractures: a prospective, randomized study comparing two methods of syndesmosis fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 18:331–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karapinar H, Kalenderer O, Karapinar L, Altay T, Manisali M, Gunal I. 2007. Effects of three- or four-cortex syndesmotic fixation in ankle fractures. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 97:457–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liacouras PC, Wayne JS. 2007. Computational modeling to predict mechanical function of joints: application to the lower leg with simulation of two cadaver studies. J Biomech Eng. 129:811–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Zhang K, Zhuang Y, Li Z, Yu B, Pei G. 2013. Analysis of the stress and displacement distribution of inferior tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries repaired with screw fixation: a finite element study. PloS ONE. 8:e80236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Zhao G, Yu B, Ma J, Li Z, Zhang K. 2016. Effects of inferior tibiofibular syndesmosis injury and screw stabilization on motion of the ankle: a finite element study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 24:1228–1235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manjoo A, Sanders DW, Tieszer C, MacLeod MD. 2010. Functional and radiographic results of patients with syndesmotic screw fixation: implications for screw removal. J Orthop Trauma. 24:2–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller RS, Weinhold PS, Dahners LE. 1999. Comparison of tricortical screw fixation versus a modified suture construct for fixation of ankle syndesmosis injury: a biomechanical study. J Orthop Trauma. 13:39–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore JA, Jr., Shank JR, Morgan SJ, Smith WR. 2006. Syndesmosis fixation: a comparison of three and four cortices of screw fixation without hardware removal. Foot ankle Int. 27:567–572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales-Orcajo E, Bayod J, Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo R, Losa-Iglesias M, Doblare M. 2015. Influence of first proximal phalanx geometry on hallux valgus deformity: a finite element analysis. Med Biol Eng Comput. 53:645–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naqvi GA, Cunningham P, Lynch B, Galvin R, Awan N. 2012. Fixation of ankle syndesmotic injuries: comparison of tightrope fixation and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy of syndesmotic reduction. Am J Sports Med. 40:2828–2835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie B, Panzer MB, Mane A, Mait AR, Donlon JP, Forman JL, Kent RW. 2016. A framework for parametric modeling of ankle ligaments to determine the in situ response under gross foot motion. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng Imaging Vis. 19:1254–1265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrier A, Bucki M, Luboz V, Vuillerme N, Payan Y. 2015. 3D musculoskeletal finite element analysis of the foot kinematics under muscle activation with and without ankle arthrodesis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng Imaging Vis. 14:1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Qiang M, Chen Y, Zhang K, Li H, Dai H. 2014. Measurement of three-dimensional morphological characteristics of the calcaneus using CT image post-processing. J Foot Ankle Res. 7:19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey PL, Hamilton W. 1976. Changes in tibiotalar area of contact caused by lateral talar shift. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 58:356–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegler S, Block J, Schneck CD. 1988. The mechanical characteristics of the collateral ligaments of the human ankle joint. Foot ankle. 8:234–242.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang Y, Guo ZY, Sun X, Lu SB, Xu WJ, Zhao Q, Peng J. 2016. Identification of changes in gene expression of ratsafter sensory and motor nerves injury. Sci Rep. 6:26579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Li Z, Wong DW, Zhang M. 2015. Effects of ankle arthrodesis on biomechanical performance of the entire foot. PloS ONE. 10:e0134340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong DW, Niu W, Wang Y, Zhang M. 2016. Finite element analysis of foot and ankle impact injury: risk evaluation of calcaneus and talus fracture. PloS ONE.11:e0154435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang K, Chen Y, Qiang M, Hao Y, Li H, Dai H. 2014. The morphology of medial malleolus and its clinical relevance. Pak J Med Sci. 30:348–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar