FEBio finite element models of the human lumbar spine

References

• Ackerman MJ. 1997. The Visible Human ProjectTM: a resource for anatomical visualization. In: Information Technology Applications in Biomedicine, 1997. ITAB ’97. Proceedings of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Region 8 International Conference. p. 29–31.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson AE, Ellis BJ, Weiss JA. 2007. Verification, validation and sensitivity studies in computational biomechanics. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 10:171–184.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ateshian DGA, Shim JJ, Maas SA, Weiss JA. 2017 Dec 13. Finite element framework for computational fluid dynamics in FEBio. J Biomech Eng.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayturk UM, Puttlitz CM. 2011. Parametric convergence sensitivity and validation of a finite element model of the human lumbar spine. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 14:695–705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahill PJ, Wang W, Asghar J, Booker R, Betz RR, Ramsey C, Baran G. 2012. The use of a transition rod may prevent proximal junctional kyphosis in the thoracic spine after scoliosis surgery: a finite element analysis. Spine 37:E687.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell JQ, Coombs DJ, Rao M, Rullkoetter PJ, Petrella AJ. 2016. Automated finite element meshing of the lumbar spine: Verification and validation with 18 specimen-specific models. J. Biomech. 49:2669–2676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell JQ, Petrella AJ. 2015. An automated method for landmark identification and finite-element modeling of the lumbar spine. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 62:2709–2716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cegoñino J, Moramarco V, Calvo-Echenique A, Pappalettere C, Pérez del Palomar A. 2014. A constitutive model for the annulus of human intervertebral disc: implications for developing a degeneration model and its influence on lumbar spine functioning. J. Appl. Math. 2014:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Chen CS, Cheng CK, Liu CL, Lo WH. 2001. Stress analysis of the disc adjacent to interbody fusion in lumbar spine. Med Eng Phys. 23:483–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong L, Li G, Mao H, Marek S, Yang KH. 2013. Development and validation of a 10-year-old child ligamentous cervical spine finite element model. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 41:2538–2552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreischarf M, Zander T, Bergmann G, Rohlmann A. 2010. A non-optimized follower load path may cause considerable intervertebral rotations. J Biomech. 43:2625–2628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreischarf M, Zander T, Shirazi-Adl A, Puttlitz CM, Adam CJ, Chen CS, Goel VK, Kiapour A, Kim YH, Labus KM, et al. 2014. Comparison of eight published static finite element models of the intact lumbar spine: predictive power of models improves when combined together. J Biomech. 47:1757–1766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs NT, Cortes DH, Peloquin JM, Vresilovic EJ, Elliott DM. 2014. Validation and application of an intervertebral disc finite element model utilizing independently constructed tissue-level constitutive formulations that are nonlinear, anisotropic, and time-dependent. J Biomech. 47:2540–2546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs NT, Cortes DH, Vresilovic EJ, Elliott DM. 2013. Biaxial tension of fibrous tissue: using finite element methods to address experimental challenges arising from boundary donditions and anisotropy. J Biomech Eng. 135:0210041–02100410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiapour A, Anderson DG, Spenciner DB, Ferrara L, Goel VK. 2012. Kinematic effects of a pedicle-lengthening osteotomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. J. Neurosurg. Spine 17:314–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumaresan S, Yoganandan N, Pintar FA. 1999. Finite element analysis of the cervical spine: a material property sensitivity study. Clin. Biomech. Bristol Avon 14:41–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little JP, Izatt MT, Labrom RD, Askin GN, Adam CJ. 2013. An FE investigation simulating intra-operative corrective forces applied to correct scoliosis deformity. Scoliosis 8:9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maas SA, Ellis BJ, Ateshian GA, Weiss JA. 2012. FEBio: finite elements for biomechanics. J Biomech Eng. 134:011005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas SA, Ellis BJ, Rawlins DS, Weiss JA. 2016. Finite element simulation of articular contact mechanics with quadratic tetrahedral elements. J Biomech. 49:659–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malandrino A, Noailly J, Lacroix D. 2013. Regional annulus fibre orientations used as a tool for the calibration of lumbar intervertebral disc finite element models. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Engin. 16:923–928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer GJM, Homminga J, Veldhuizen AG, Verkerke GJ. 2011. Influence of interpersonal geometrical variation on spinal motion segment stiffness: implications for patient-specific modeling. Spine 36:E929–935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natarajan RN, Andersson GB. 1999. The influence of lumbar disc height and cross-sectional area on the mechanical response of the disc to physiologic loading. Spine 24:1873–1881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemeyer F, Wilke H-J, Schmidt H. 2012. Geometry strongly influences the response of numerical models of the lumbar spine—a probabilistic finite element analysis. J Biomech. 45:1414–1423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxland TR. 2016. Fundamental biomechanics of the spine–what we have learned in the past 25 years and future directions. J Biomech. 49:817–832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patwardhan AG, Havey RM, Meade KP, Lee B, Dunlap B. 1999. A follower load increases the load-carrying capacity of the lumbar spine in compression. Spine 24:1003–1009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng RD. 2011. Reproducible research in computational science. Science 334:1226–1227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robin S, Skalli W, Lavaste F. 1994. Influence of geometrical factors on the behavior of lumbar spine segments: a finite element analysis. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res. Soc. 3:84–90.
   Google Scholar
• Rohlmann A, Burra NK, Zander T, Bergmann G. 2007. Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis. Eur. Spine J. Off. Publ. Eur. Spine Soc. Eur. Spinal Deform. Soc. Eur. Sect. Cerv. Spine Res. Soc. 16:1223–1231.
   Google Scholar
• Rohlmann A, Neller S, Claes L, Bergmann G, Wilke HJ. 2001. Influence of a follower load on intradiscal pressure and intersegmental rotation of the lumbar spine. Spine 26:E557–561.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rohlmann A, Zander T, Schmidt H, Wilke H-J, Bergmann G. 2006. Analysis of the influence of disc degeneration on the mechanical behaviour of a lumbar motion segment using the finite element method. J Biomech. 39:2484–2490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt H, Galbusera F, Rohlmann A, Zander T, Wilke H-J. 2012. Effect of multilevel lumbar disc arthroplasty on spine kinematics and facet joint loads in flexion and extension: a finite element analysis. Eur. Spine J. Off. Publ. Eur. Spine Soc. Eur. Spinal Deform. Soc. Eur. Sect. Cerv. Spine Res. Soc. 21(Suppl 5):S663–S674.
   Google Scholar
• Shirazi-Adl A. 1994. Biomechanics of the lumbar spine in sagittal/lateral moments. Spine 19:2407–2414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirazi-Adl SA, Shrivastava SC, Ahmed AM. 1984. Stress analysis of the lumbar disc-body unit in compression. A three-dimensional nonlinear finite element study. Spine 9:120–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilke HJ, Neef P, Caimi M, Hoogland T, Claes LE. 1999. New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life. Spine 24:755–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woldtvedt DJ, Womack W, Gadomski BC, Schuldt D, Puttlitz CM. 2011. Finite element lumbar spine facet contact parameter predictions are affected by the cartilage thickness distribution and initial joint gap size. J Biomech Eng. 133:061009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu M, Yang J, Lieberman IH, Haddas R. 2017. Lumbar spine finite element model for healthy subjects: development and validation. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 20:1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zander T, Dreischarf M, Timm A-K, Baumann WW, Schmidt H. 2017. Impact of material and morphological parameters on the mechanical response of the lumbar spine - A finite element sensitivity study. J Biomech. 53:185–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar