Hemodynamic simulation of intracranial aneurysm growth with virtual silk stent implantation

References

• Alghamdi F, Morais R, Scillia P, Lubicz B. 2015. The Silk flow-diverter stent for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Expert Rev Med Devices. 12(6):753–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augsburger L, Reymond P, Rufenacht DA, Stergiopulos N. 2011. Intracranial stents being modeled as a porous medium: flow simulation in stented cerebral aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng. 39(2):850–863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boecherschwarz HG, Ringel K, Kopacz L, Heimann A, Kempski O. 2000. Ex vivo study of the physical effect of coils on pressure and flow dynamics in experimental aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 21(8):1532–1536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cebral JR, Castro MA, Burgess JE, Pergolizzi RS, Sheridan MJ, Putman CM. 2005. Characterization of cerebral aneurysms for assessing risk of rupture by using patient-specific computational hemodynamics models. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 26(10):2550–2559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong W, Zhang Y, Qian Y, Lai L, Parker G, Mitchell K. 2014. Computational hemodynamics analysis of intracranial aneurysms treated with flow diverters: correlation with clinical outcomes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 35(1):136–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock SD, Iannaccone F, Santis GD, Beule MD, Mortier P, Verhegghe B, Segers P. 2012. Our capricious vessels: the influence of stent design and vessel geometry on the mechanics of intracranial aneurysm stent deployment. J Biomech. 45(8):1353–1359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding D. 2014. Endovascular approaches for morphologically unfavorable intracranial aneurysms: adjunctive coiling techniques versus flow diversion. Acta Neurochir. 156(9):1701–1702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farnoush A, Avolio A, Qian Y. 2014. A growth model of saccular aneurysms based on hemodynamic and morphologic discriminant parameters for risk of rupture. J Clin Neurosci. 21(9):1514–1519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foutrakis GN, Yonas H, Sclabassi RJ. 1999. Saccular aneurysm formation in curved and bifurcating arteries. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 20(7):1309–1317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francesco B, Giuseppe L, Mariano M, Giuseppe M, Ferdinando C, Arturo B, Francesco M. 2015. Endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms using flow-diverter devices: a systematic review. Neuroradiol J. 28(4):365–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goubergrits L, Schaller J, Kertzscher U, Woelken T, Ringelstein M, Spuler A. 2014. Hemodynamic impact of cerebral aneurysm endovascular treatment devices: coils and flow diverters. Expert Rev Med Devices. 11(4):361–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallmes DF, Hanel R, Lopes D, Boccardi E, Bonafé A, Cekirge S, Fiorella D, Jabbour P, Levy E, McDougall C, et al. 2015. International retrospective study of the pipeline embolization device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 36(1):108–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaminogo M, Yonekura M, Shibata S. 2003. Incidence and outcome of multiple intracranial aneurysms in a defined population. Stroke 34(1):16–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulcsár Z, Augsburger L, Reymond P, Pereira VM, Hirsch S, Mallik AS, Millar J, Wetzel SG, Wanke I, Rüfenacht DA. 2012. Flow diversion treatment: intra-aneurismal blood flow velocity and wss reduction are parameters to predict aneurysm thrombosis. Acta Neurochir. 154(10):1827–1834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linn FH, Rinkel GJ, Algra A, Van GJ. 1996. Incidence of subarachnoid hemorrhage: role of region, year, and rate of computed tomography: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 27(4):625–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liou TM, Liou SN, Chu KL. 2004. Intra-aneurysmal flow with helix and mesh stent placement across side-wall aneurysm pore of a straight parent vessel. J Biomech Eng. 126(1):36–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long Y, Yu H, Zhuo Z, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Yang X, Li H. 2014. A geometric scaling model for assessing the impact of aneurysm size ratio on hemodynamic characteristics. Biomed Eng Online. 13(1):1–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Long Y, Zhong J, Yu H, Yan H, Zhuo Z, Meng Q, Yang X, Li H. 2015. A scaling aneurysm model-based approach to assessing the role of flow pattern and energy loss in aneurysm rupture prediction. J Transl Med. 13(1):1–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lylyk P, Ferrario A, Pasbón B, Miranda C, Doroszuk G. 2005. Buenos aires experience with the neuroform self-expanding stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 102(2):235–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales HG, Kim M, Vivas EE, Villauriol MC, Larrabide I, Sola T, Guimaraens L, Frangi AF. 2011. How do coil configuration and packing density influence intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics? Am J Neuroradiol. 32(10):1935–1941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira VM, Bonnefous O, Ouared R, Brina O, Stawiaski J, Aerts H, Ruijters D, Narata AP, Bijlenga P, Schaller K, et al. 2013. A dsa-based method using contrast-motion estimation for the assessment of the intra-aneurysmal flow changes induced by flow-diverter stents. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 34(4):808–815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghavan ML, Ma B, Harbaugh RE. 2005. Quantified aneurysm shape and rupture risk. J Neurosurg. 102(2):355–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retarekar R, Ramachandran M, Dickerhoff B, Harbaugh R, Hasan D, Ogilvy C, Rosenwasser R, Raghavan ML. 2012. Hemodynamics and natural history outcome in unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a prospective longitudinal cohort study. Dissertations & Theses - Gradworks, V01AT18A004-V01AT18A004.
   Google Scholar
• Shojima M, Oshima M, Takagi K, Torii R, Hayakawa M, Katada K, Morita A, Kirino T. 2004. Magnitude and role of wall shear stress on cerebral aneurysm: computational fluid dynamic study of 20 middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Stroke. 36(9):2500–2505.
   Google Scholar
• Sugiyama S, Meng H, Funamoto K, Inoue T, Fujimura M, Nakayama T, Omodaka S, Shimizu H, Takahashi A, Tominaga T. 2012. Hemodynamic analysis of growing intracranial aneurysms arising from a posterior inferior cerebellar artery. World Neurosurg. 78(5):462–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szikora I, Berentei Z, Kulcsar Z, Marosfoi M, Vajda ZS, Lee W, Berez A, Nelson PK. 2010. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 31(6):1139–1147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tateshima S, Tanishita K, Omura H, Villablanca JP, Vinuela F. 2007. Intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics during the growth of an unruptured aneurysm: in vitro study using longitudinal CT angiogram database. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 28(4):622–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ujiie H, Tachibana H, Hiramatsu O, Hazel AL, Matsumoto T, Ogasawara Y, Nakajima H, Hori T, Takakura K, Kajiya F. 1999. Effects of size and shape (aspect ratio) on the hemodynamics of saccular aneurysms: a possible index for surgical treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 45(1):119–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utter B, Rossmann JS. 2007. Numerical simulation of saccular aneurysm hemodynamics: influence of morphology on rupture risk. J Biomech. 40(12):2716–2722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Ding G, Zhang Y, Yang X. 2011. Computational haemodynamics in two idealised cerebral wide-necked aneurysms after stent placement. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 14(11):927–937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir B. 2002. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a review. J Neurosurg. 96(1):3–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir B, Amidei C, Kongable G, Findlay JM, Kassell NF, Kelly J, Dai L, Karrison TG. 2003. The aspect ratio (dome/neck) of ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 99(3):447–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston J III, Meissner I, Brown RD Jr, Piepgras DG, Forbes GS, Thielen K, Nichols D, O'Fallon WM, et al. 2003. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet. 362(9378):103–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winn HR, Jane JA Sr, Taylor J, Kaiser D, Britz GW. 2002. Prevalence of asymptomatic incidental aneurysms: review of 4568 arteriograms. J Neurosurg. 96(1):43–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang J, Damiano RJ, Lin N, Snyder KV, Siddiqui AH, Levy EI, Meng H. 2015. High-fidelity virtual stenting: modeling of flow diverter deployment for hemodynamic characterization of complex intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 123(4):832–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang J, Tremmel M, Kolega J, Levy EI, Natarajan SK, Meng H. 2012. Newtonian viscosity model could overestimate wall shear stress in intracranial aneurysm domes and underestimate rupture risk. J Neurointerv Surg. 4(5):351–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng Z, Durka MJ, Kallmes DF, Ding Y, Robertson AM. 2011. Can aspect ratio be used to categorize intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics?–a study of elastase induced aneurysms in rabbit. J Biomech. 44(16):2809–2816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Mu SQ, Chen JL, Wang SZ, Li HY, Yu HY, Jiang F, Yang XJ. 2011. Hemodynamic analysis of intracranial aneurysms with daughter blebs. Eur Neurol. 66:359–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong J, Long Y, Yan H, Meng Q, Zhao J, Zhang Y, Yang X, Li H. 2016. Fast virtual stenting with active contour models in intracranical aneurysm. Sci Rep. 6:21724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar