A multiscale investigation of mechanical properties of bio-inspired scaffolds

References

• Aryal S, Matsunaga K, Ching W-Y. 2015. Ab initio simulation of elastic and mechanical properties of Zn-and Mg-doped hydroxyapatite (HAP). J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 47:135–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babensee JE, Anderson JM, McIntire LV, Mikos AG. 1998. Host response to tissue engineered devices. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 33(1–2):111–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bose S, Roy M, Bandyopadhyay A. 2012. Recent advances in bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Trends Biotechnol. 30(10):546–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching W, Rulis P, Misra A. 2009. Ab initio elastic properties and tensile strength of crystalline hydroxyapatite. Acta Biomater. 5(8):3067–3075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury M, Islam M, Ibna Zahid Z. 2016. Finite element modeling of compressive and splitting tensile behavior of plain concrete and steel fiber reinforced concrete cylinder specimens. Adv Civ Eng. 2016:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Cox SC, Thornby JA, Gibbons GJ, Williams MA, Mallick KK. 2015. 3D printing of porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds intended for use in bone tissue engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng C. 47:237–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deymier AC, Nair AK, Depalle B, Qin Z, Arcot K, Drouet C, Yoder CH, Buehler MJ, Thomopoulos S, Genin GM. 2017. Protein-free formation of bone-like apatite: new insights into the key role of carbonation. Biomaterials. 127:75–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitriou R, Jones E, McGonagle D, Giannoudis PV. 2011. Bone regeneration: current concepts and future directions. BMC Med. 9(1):66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Do AV, Khorsand B, Geary SM, Salem AK. 2015. 3D printing of scaffolds for tissue regeneration applications. Adv Healthc Mater. 4(12):1742–1762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost HM. 1994. Wolff's Law and bone's structural adaptations to mechanical usage: an overview for clinicians. Angle Orthod. 64(3):175–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallegos-Nieto E, Medellín-Castillo HI, de Lange DF. 2015. A complete structural performance analysis and modelling of hydroxyapatite scaffolds with variable porosity. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 18(11):1225–1237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson LJ, Ashby MF. 1999. Cellular solids: structure and properties. Cambridge (MA): Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore R, Katz J. 1982. Elastic properties of apatites. J Mater Sci. 17(4):1131–1141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross KA, Rodrı́guez-Lorenzo LM. 2004. Biodegradable composite scaffolds with an interconnected spherical network for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 25(20):4955–4962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes JM, Cameron M, Crowley KD. 1989. Structural variations in natural F, OH, and Cl apatites. Am Mineral. 74(7–8):870–876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inzana JA, Olvera D, Fuller SM, Kelly JP, Graeve OA, Schwarz EM, Kates SL, Awad HA. 2014. 3D printing of composite calcium phosphate and collagen scaffolds for bone regeneration. Biomaterials. 35(13):4026–4034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz J, Ukraincik K. 1971. On the anisotropic elastic properties of hydroxyapatite. J Biomech. 4(3):221–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutsopoulos S. 2002. Synthesis and characterization of hydroxyapatite crystals: a review study on the analytical methods. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 62(4):600–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S. 2008. Boundary conditions for unit cells from periodic microstructures and their implications. Compos Sci Technol. 68(9):1962–1974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menéndez-Proupin E, Cervantes-Rodríguez S, Osorio-Pulgar R, Franco-Cisterna M, Camacho-Montes H, Fuentes M. 2011. Computer simulation of elastic constants of hydroxyapatite and fluorapatite. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 4(7):1011–1020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller B. 2012. Additive manufacturing technologies–rapid prototyping to direct digital manufacturing. Assembly Automation. 32(2):1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Nagels J, Stokdijk M, Rozing PM. 2003. Stress shielding and bone resorption in shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 12(1):35–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair AK, Gautieri A, Chang S-W, Buehler MJ. 2013. Molecular mechanics of mineralized collagen fibrils in bone. Nat Commun. 4:1724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niinomi M, Nakai M. 2011. Titanium-based biomaterials for preventing stress shielding between implant devices and bone. Int J Biomater. 2011:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Oryan A, Alidadi S, Moshiri A, Maffulli N. 2014. Bone regenerative medicine: classic options, novel strategies, and future directions. J Orthop Surg Res. 9(1):18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otsuki B, Takemoto M, Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. 2006. Pore throat size and connectivity determine bone and tissue ingrowth into porous implants: three-dimensional micro-CT based structural analyses of porous bioactive titanium implants. Biomaterials. 27(35):5892–5900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasteris JD. 2016. A mineralogical view of apatitic biomaterials. Am Mineral. 101(12):2594–2610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul CD. 2015. Interface Property of Collagen and Hydroxyapatite in Bone and Developing Bioinspired Materials. Inquiry: The University of Arkansas Undergraduate Research Journal. 19:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Puleo D, Nanci A. 1999. Understanding and controlling the bone–implant interface. Biomaterials. 20(23–24):2311–2321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raimondi MT, Eaton SM, Laganà M, Aprile V, Nava MM, Cerullo G, Osellame R. 2013. Three-dimensional structural niches engineered via two-photon laser polymerization promote stem cell homing. Acta Biomater. 9(1):4579–4584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramesh N, Moratti SC, Dias GJ. 2018. Hydroxyapatite–polymer biocomposites for bone regeneration: a review of current trends. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 106(5): 2046–2057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren F, Case E, Morrison A, Tafesse M, Baumann M. 2009. Resonant ultrasound spectroscopy measurement of Young's modulus, shear modulus and Poisson's ratio as a function of porosity for alumina and hydroxyapatite. Philos Mag. 89(14):1163–1182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice RW. 1998. Porosity of ceramics: properties and applications. Boca Raton (FL):CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ridzwan M, Shuib S, Hassan A, Shokri A, Ibrahim MM. 2007. Problem of stress shielding and improvement to the hip implant designs: a review. J Med Sci. 7(3):460–467.
   Google Scholar
• Sadat-Shojai M, Khorasani M-T, Dinpanah-Khoshdargi E, Jamshidi A. 2013. Synthesis methods for nanosized hydroxyapatite with diverse structures. Acta Biomater. 9(8):7591–7621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schijve J. 2001. Fatigue of structures and materials. New York (NY): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd JH, Shepherd DV, Best SM. 2012. Substituted hydroxyapatites for bone repair. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 23(10):2335–2347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šupová M. 2015. Substituted hydroxyapatites for biomedical applications: a review. Ceram Int. 41(8):9203–9231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Bael S, Chai YC, Truscello S, Moesen M, Kerckhofs G, Van Oosterwyck H, Kruth J-P, Schrooten J. 2012. The effect of pore geometry on the in vitro biological behavior of human periosteum-derived cells seeded on selective laser-melted Ti6Al4V bone scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 8(7):2824–2834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu C, Pongkitwitoon S, Qiu J, Thomopoulos S, Xia Y. 2018. Design and fabrication of a hierarchically structured scaffold for tendon‐to‐bone repair. Adv Mater. 30 (16):1707306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar