Assessment of scapular morphology and bone quality with statistical models

References

• Anglin C, Tolhurst P, Wyss UP, Pichora DR. 1999. Glenoid cancellous bone strength and modulus. J Biomech. 32(10):1091–1097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali AA, Cristofolini L, Schileo E, Hu H, Taddei F, Kim RH, Rullkoetter PJ, Laz PJ. 2014. Specimen-specific modeling of hip fracture pattern and repair. J Biomech. 47(2):536–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin MA, Langenderfer JE, Rullkoetter PJ, Laz PJ. 2010. Development of subject-specific and statistical shape models of the knee using an efficient segmentation and mesh-morphing approach. Comp Methods Prog Biomed. 97(3):232–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besl PJ, McKay ND. 1992. A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 14(2):239–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan R, Mohan PS, Hopkins A, Galloway F, Taylor M, Nair PB. 2010. Statistical modelling of the whole human femur incorporating geometric and material properties. Med Eng Phys. 32(1):57–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan R, Nair PB, Taylor M. 2009. Use of a statistical model of the whole femur in a large scale, multi-model study of femoral neck fracture risk. J Biomech. 42(13):2171–2176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell JQ, Petrella AJ. 2016. Automated finite element modeling of the lumbar spine: Using a statistical shape model to generate a virtual population of models. J Biomech. 49(13):2593–2599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campoli G, Baka N, Kaptein BL, Valstar ER, Zachow S, Weinans H, Zadpoor AA. 2014. Relationship between the shape and density distribution of the femur and its natural frequencies of vibration. J Biomech. 47(13):3334–3343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchill RS, Brems JJ, Kotschi H. 2001. Glenoid size, inclination, and version: an anatomic study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 10(4):327–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cootes TF, Taylor CJ. 2001. Statistical models of appearance for medical image analysis and computer vision. Proc SPIE Med Imaging. 4322:236–248.
   Google Scholar
• Ding C, He X. 2004. K-means clustering via principal component analysis. International Conference of Machine Learning, 29.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick CK, Baldwin MA, Ali AA, Laz PJ, Rullkoetter PJ. 2011. Comparison of patellar bone strain in the natural and implanted knee during simulated deep flexion. J Orthop Res. 29(2):232–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick CK, Hemelaar P, Taylor M. 2014. Computationally efficient prediction of bone–implant interface micromotion of a cementless tibial tray during gait. J Biomech. 47(7):1718–1726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankle MA, Teramoto A, Luo Z-P, Levy JC, Pupello D. 2009. Glenoid morphology in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: classification and surgical implications. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 18(6):874–885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman RJ, Hawthorne KB, Genez BM. 1992. The use of computerized tomography in the measurement of glenoid version. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 74(7):1032–1037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frich LH. 1994. Glenoid Knoglestyrke og knoglestruktur [Glenoid bone strength and bone structure] [dissertation]. Aarhus: University of Aarhus (Denmark).
   Google Scholar
• Frich LH, Jensen NC, Odgaard A, Pedersen CM, Søjbjerg JO, Dalstra M. 1997. Bone strength and material properties of the glenoid. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 6(2):97–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulin P, Kysilko M, Pokorny D, Padr R, Kasprikova N, Landor I, Sosna A. 2017. Study of the variability of scapular inclination and the glenoid version – considerations for preoperative planning: clinical-radiological study . BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 18(1):16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ghafurian S, Galdi B, Bastian S, Tan V, Li K. 2016. Computerized 3D morphological analysis of glenoid orientation. J Orthop Res. 34(4):692–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Dan P. 2004. Bone geometry and mechanical properties of the human scapula using computed tomography data. Trends Biomater Artif Organs. 17:61–70.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan SS, Leith JM, Campbell B, Kapil R, Smith KL, Matsen FA. 2002. Characteristics of unsatisfactory shoulder arthroplasties. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 11(5):431–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn JL. 1965. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika. 30:179–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iannotti JP, Gabriel JP, Schneck SL, Evans BG, Misra S. 1992. The normal glenohumeral relationships. An anatomical study of one hundred and forty shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 74(4):491–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolliffe IT. 1986. Principal component analysis and factor analysis. In: Principal component analysis. New York, NY: Springer; p. 115–128
   Google Scholar
• Kalouche I, Crépin J, Abdelmoumen S, Mitton D, Guillot G, Gagey O. 2010. Mechanical properties of glenoid cancellous bone. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)). 25(4):292–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamer L, Noser H, Popp AW, Lenz M, Blauth M. 2016. Computational anatomy of the proximal humerus: An ex vivo high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography study. J Orthop Transl. 4:46–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyak JH, Rossi SA, Jones KA, Les CM, Skinner HB. 2001. Prediction of fracture location in the proximal femur using finite element models. Med Eng Phys. 23(9):657–664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laz PJ, Browne M. 2010. A review of probabilistic analysis in orthopaedic biomechanics. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 224:927–943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtinen JT, Tingart MJ, Apreleva M, Warner JJ. 2004. Total, trabecular, and cortical bone mineral density in different regions of the glenoid. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 13(3):344–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansat P, Barea C, Hobatho MC, Darmana R, Mansat M. 1998. Anatomic variation of the mechanical properties of the glenoid. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 7(2):109–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsen FA, III Clinton J, Lynch J, Bertelsen A, Richardson ML. 2008. Glenoid component failure in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 90(4):885–896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumura N, Ogawa K, Kobayashi S, Oki S, Watanabe A, Ikegami H, Toyama Y. 2014. Morphologic features of humeral head and glenoid version in the normal glenohumeral joint. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 23(11):1724–1730.
   Google Scholar
• Mathews S, Burkhard M, Serrano N, Link K, Häusler M, Frater N, Franke I, Bischofberger H, Buck FM, Gascho D, Thali M. 2017. Glenoid morphology in light of anatomical and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a dissection-and 3D-CT-based study in male and female body donors. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 18:9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayya M, Poltaretskyi S, Hamitouche C, Chaoui J. 2013. Scapula statistical shape model construction based on watershed segmentation and elastic registration. IEEE 10th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, p. 101–104.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson EJ, Friedman RJ, An YH, Chokesi R, Dooley RL. 1997. Anthropometric study of normal glenohumeral relationships. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 6(2):105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrill A, Guzman K, Miller SL. 2009. Gender differences in glenoid anatomy: an anatomic study. Surg Radiol Anat. 31(3):183–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mimar R, Limb D, Hall RM. 2008. Evaluation of the mechanical and architectural properties of glenoid bone. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 17(2):336–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutsvangwa T, Burdin V, Schwartz C, Roux C. 2015. An automated statistical shape model developmental pipeline: application to the human scapula and humerus. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 62(4):1098–1107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers CA, Laz PJ, Shelburne KB, Davidson BS. 2015. A probabilistic approach to quantify the impact of uncertainty propagation in musculoskeletal simulations. Ann Biomed Eng. 43(5):1098–1111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myronenko A, Song X, Carreira-Perpinán MA. 2007. Non-rigid point set registration: Coherent point drift. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intel. 1009–1016.
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke D, Al-Dirini RM, Taylor M. 2018. Primary stability of a cementless acetabular cup in a cohort of patient-specific finite element models. J Orthop Res. 36(3):1012–1023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Querol LB, Büchler P, Rueckert D, Nolte LP, Ballester MÁ. 2006. Statistical finite element model for bone shape and biomechanical properties. Int Conf Med Image Comp and Comp-Assisted Intervention. October 1; Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. p. 405–411.
   Google Scholar
• Roberson TA, Bentley JC, Griscom JT, Kissenberth MJ, Tolan SJ, Hawkins RJ, Tokish JM. 2017. Outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty in patients younger than 65 years: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 26(7):1298–1306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schileo E, Dall’Ara E, Taddei F, Malandrino A, Schotkamp T, Baleani M, Viceconti M. 2008. An accurate estimation of bone density improves the accuracy of subject-specific finite element models. J Biomech. 41(11):2483–2491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sintini I, Burton WS II, Sade P Sr, Chavarria JM, Laz PJ. 2018. Investigating gender and ethnicity differences in proximal humeral morphology using a statistical shape model. J Orthop Res. 36(11):3043–3052. doi:10.1002/jor.24070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrancken AC, Crijns SP, Ploegmakers MJ, O'kane C, Tienen TG, Janssen D, Buma P, Verdonschot N. 2014. 3D geometry analysis of the medial meniscus-a statistical shape modeling approach. J Anat. 225(4):395–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner BS, Hudek R, Burkhart KJ, Gohlke F. 2017. The influence of three-dimensional planning on decision-making in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 26(8):1477–1483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu G, van der Helm FCT, (DirkJan) Veeger HEJ, Makhsous M, Van Roy P, Anglin C, Nagels J, Karduna AR, McQuade K, Wang X, et al. 2005. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion—Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. J Biomech. 38(5):981–992.,
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang YM, Rueckert D, Bull AM. 2008. Predicting the shapes of bones at a joint: application to the shoulder. Comput Method Biomech Biomed Eng. 11(1):19–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Fernandez J, Hislop-Jambrich J, Besier TF. 2016. Lower limb estimation from sparse landmarks using an articulated shape model. J Biomech. 49(16):3875–3881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar