Biomechanical comparison of implant inclinations and load times with the all-on-4 treatment concept: a three-dimensional finite element analysis

References

• Almeida EO, Rocha EP, Freitas Junior AC, Anchieta RB, Poveda R, Gupta N, Coelho PG. 2015. Tilted and short implants supporting fixed prosthesis in an atrophic maxilla: a 3D-FEA biomechanical evaluation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 17(Suppl 1):e332–e342.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bacchi A, Consani RL, Mesquita MF, Dos Santos MB. 2013. Effect of framework material and vertical misfit on stress distribution in implant-supported partial prosthesis under load application: 3-D finite element analysis. Acta Odontol Scand. 71(5):1243–1249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellini CM, Romeo D, Galbusera F, Taschieri S, Raimondi MT, Zampelis A, Francetti L. 2009. Comparison of tilted versus nontilted implant-supported prosthetic designs for the restoration of the edentuous mandible: a biomechanical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 24(3):511–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benzing UR, Gall H, Weber H. 1995. Biomechanical aspects of two different implant-prosthetic concepts for edentulous maxillae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 10(2):188–198.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhering CL, Mesquita MF, Kemmoku DT, Noritomi PY, Consani RL, Barao VA. 2016. Comparison between all-on-four and all-on-six treatment concepts and framework material on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: A prototyping guided 3D-FEA study. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 69:715–725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunski JB, Puleo DA, Nanci A. 2000. Biomaterials and biomechanics of oral and maxillofacial implants: current status and future developments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 15(1):15–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalli N, Barbaro B, Spasari D, Azzola F, Ciatti A, Francetti L. 2012. Tilted implants for full-arch rehabilitations in completely edentulous maxilla: a retrospective study. Int J Dent. 2012:1.
   Google Scholar
• Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M. 2009. Methods to treat the edentulous posterior maxilla: implants with sinus grafting. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 67(4):867–871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Souza Batista VE, Verri FR, Almeida DA, Santiago Junior JF, Lemos CA, Pellizzer EP. 2017. Finite element analysis of implant-supported prosthesis with pontic and cantilever in the posterior maxilla. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 20(6):663–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dos Santos MBF, Meloto GO, Bacchi A, Correr-Sobrinho L. 2017. Stress distribution in cylindrical and conical implants under rotational micromovement with different boundary conditions and bone properties: 3-D FEA. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 20(8):893–900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duyck J, Ronold HJ, Van Oosterwyck H, Naert I, Vander Sloten J, Ellingsen JE. 2001. The influence of static and dynamic loading on marginal bone reactions around osseointegrated implants: an animal experimental study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 12(3):207–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazi G, Tellini S, Vangi D, Branchi R. 2011. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of different implant configurations for a mandibular fixed prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 26(4):752–759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francetti L, Romeo D, Corbella S, Taschieri S, Del Fabbro M. 2012. Bone level changes around axial and tilted implants in full-arch fixed immediate restorations. Interim results of a prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 14(5):646–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gumrukcu Z, Korkmaz YT. 2018. Influence of implant number, length, and tilting degree on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: a finite element study. Med Biol Eng Comput. 56(6):979–989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horita S, Sugiura T, Yamamoto K, Murakami K, Imai Y, Kirita T. 2017. Biomechanical analysis of immediately loaded implants according to the “all-on-four” concept. J Prosthodont Res. 61(2):123–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang HL, Hsu JT, Fuh LJ, Tu MG, Ko CC, Shen YW. 2008. Bone stress and interfacial sliding analysis of implant designs on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: a non-linear finite element study. J Dent. 36(6):409–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malo P, Rangert B, Nobre M. 2003. All-on-Four" immediate-function concept with Branemark System implants for completely edentulous mandibles: a retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 5(Suppl 1):2–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malo P, Rangert B, Nobre M. 2005. All-on-4 immediate-function concept with Branemark System implants for completely edentulous maxillae: a 1-year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Rel Res. 7(s1):S88–S94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mellal A, Wiskott HW, Botsis J, Scherrer SS, Belser UC. 2004. Stimulating effect of implant loading on surrounding bone. Comparison of three numerical models and validation by in vivo data. Clin Oral Implants Res. 15(2):239–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misch CE, Suzuki JB, Misch-Dietsh FM, Bidez MW. 2005. A positive correlation between occlusal trauma and peri-implant bone loss: literature support. Implant Dent. 14(2):108–116.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pessoa RS, Coelho PG, Muraru L, Marcantonio E, Jr., Vaz LG, Vander Sloten J, Jaecques SV. 2011. Influence of implant design on the biomechanical environment of immediately placed implants: computed tomography-based nonlinear three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 26(6):1279–1287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly DT, Burstein AH. 1975. The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. J Biomech. 8(6):393–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubo JH, Capello Souza EA. 2010. Finite-element analysis of stress on dental implant prosthesis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 12(2):105–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh Saber F, Ghasemi S, Koodaryan R, Babaloo A, Abolfazli N. 2015. The Comparison of Stress Distribution with Different Implant Numbers and Inclination Angles In All-on-four and Conventional Methods in Maxilla: A Finite Element Analysis. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 9(4):246–253.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sevimay M, Turhan F, Kilicarslan MA, Eskitascioglu G. 2005. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown. J Prosthet Dent. 93(3):227–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shigemitsu R, Yoda N, Ogawa T, Kawata T, Gunji Y, Yamakawa Y, Ikeda K, Sasaki K. 2014. Biological-data-based finite-element stress analysis of mandibular bone with implant-supported overdenture. Comput Biol Med. 54:44–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva GC, Mendonca JA, Lopes LR, Landre J. Jr. 2010. Stress patterns on implants in prostheses supported by four or six implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 25(2):239–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trisi P, Perfetti G, Baldoni E, Berardi D, Colagiovanni M, Scogna G. 2009. Implant micromotion is related to peak insertion torque and bone density. Clin Oral Implants Res. 20(5):467–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verri FR, Cruz RS, de Souza Batista VE, Almeida DA, Verri AC, Lemos CA, Santiago Junior JF, Pellizzer EP. 2016. Can the modeling for simplification of a dental implant surface affect the accuracy of 3D finite element analysis? Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 19(15):1665–1672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu JC, Chen CS, Yip SW, Hsu ML. 2012. Stress distribution and micromotion analyses of immediately loaded implants of varying lengths in the mandible and fibular bone grafts: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 27(5):e77–e84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar