Stress distribution of three-unit fixed partial prostheses (conventional and pontic) supported by three or two implants: 3D finite element analysis of ductile materials

References

• Akça K, Cehreli MC. 2006. Biomechanical consequences of progressive marginal bone loss around oral implants: a finite element stress analysis. Med Biol Eng Comput. 44(7):527–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashman RB, Van Buskirk WC. 1987. The elastic properties of a human mandible. Adv Dent Res. 1(1):64–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Attard N, Zarb GA. 2003. Implant prosthodontic management of partially edentulous patients missing posterior teeth: the Toronto experience. J Prosthet Dent. 89(4):352–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer R, Welsch G, Collings EW. 1994. Materials Properties Handbook: Titanium Alloys. Novelty, OH: ASM International.
   Google Scholar
• Buser D, Belser UC, Lang N. 1998. The original one-stage dental implant system and its clinical application. Periodontol 2000. 17(1):106–118.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bragger U, Krenander P, Lang NP. 2005. Economic aspects of single-tooth replacement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 16(3):335–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen XY, Zhang CY, Nie EM, Zhang MC. 2012. Treatment planning of implants when 3 mandibular posterior teeth are missing: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Implant Dent. 21(4):340–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrêa CB, Margonar R, Noritomi PY, Vaz LG. 2014. Mechanical behavior of dental implants in different positions in the rehabilitation of the anterior maxilla. J Prosth Dent. 3(4):301–309.
   Google Scholar
• Davidoff SR. 1996. Restorative-based treatment planning: determining adequate support for implant-retained fixed restorations. Implant Dent. 5(3):179–184.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fereguetti P, Martins JF. 2013. Aplicações do critério de resistência de von Mises para materiais dúcteis sem usar as tensões principais. In: Anais do PET Civil UFOP, 2008. Disponível em:< http://www.em.ufop.br/petcivil/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=111&Itemid=98&limitstart=1>.
   Google Scholar
• Guichet DL, Yoshinobu D, Caputo AA. 2002. Effect of splinting and interproximal contact tightness on load transfer by implant restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 87(5):528–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Highbond, Biomaterials Technology. 2017. Instruções de uso – pastilhas de cobalto cromo (Co-Cr). Disponível em: http://www.highbond.com.br/images/HB27.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Iplikçioğlu H, Akça K. 2002. Comparative evaluation of the effect of diameter, length and number of implants supporting three-unit fixed partial prostheses on stress distribution in the bone. J Dent. 30(1):41–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jivraj S, Chee W. 2006. Treatment planning of implants in posterior quadrants. Br Dent J. 201(1):13–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutjering G, Williams JC. 2003. Titanium-Engineering Materials and Processes. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Martins V, Bonilha T, Falcon-Antenucci R, Verri ACG, Verri FR. 2011. Osseointegration: analysis of clinical success and failure factors. Revista Odontológica de Araçatuba. 32(1):26–31.
   Google Scholar
• Misch CE, Suzuki JB, Misch-Dietsh FM, Bidez MW. 2005. A positive correlation between occlusal trauma and peri-implant bone loss: literature support. Implant Dent. 14(2):108–116.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meriscke-Stern R, Assal P, Meriscke E, Burgin W. 1995. Occlusal force and oral sensibility measured in partially edentulous patients with ITI implants. Int J Oral Maxill Implants. 10345–354.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Naert I, Koutsikakis G, Duyck J, Quirynen M, Jacobs R, Van Steenberghe D. 2002. Biologic outcome of implant-supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism. Part I: a longitudinal clinical evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 13(4):381–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishimura RD, Beumer J, Perri GR, Davodi A. 1997. Implants in the partially edentulous patient: restorative considerations. J Calif Dent Assoc. 25(12):866–871.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perdijk FB, Meijer GJ, Bronkhorst EM, Koole R. 2011. Implants in the severely resorbed mandibles: whether or not to augment? What is the clinician's preference? Oral Maxillofac Surg. 15(4):225–231.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rangert B, Jemt T, Jorneus L. 1989. Forces and moments on Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 4(3):241–247.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanitá PV, Pinelli LAP, Silva RHBT, Segalla JCM. 2009. Clinical applications of occlusal principles in implantology. RFO. 14(3):268–275.
   Google Scholar
• Silva MG, Mori M, Poiate Junior E, Andueza A, Vasconcelos AB, Poiate IAVP. 2005. Influência da esplintagem de restaurações protéticas fixas sobre implantes na distribuição de tensões em mandíbula edentada posterior. Revista Brasileira de Odontologia. 62(3/4):187–192.
   Google Scholar
• Stegaroiu R, Sato T, Kusakari H, Miyakawa O. 1998. Influence of restoration type on stress distribution in bone around implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 13(1):82–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan DY. 1986. Prosthetic considerations for the utilization of osseointegrated fixtures in the partially edentulous arch. Int J Oral Maxill Implants. 1:39–45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor T, Agar JR, Vogiatzi T. 2000. Implant prosthodontics: current perpective and future directions. Int J Oral Maxill Implants. 15:66–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toniollo MB, Macedo AP, Rodrigues RSC, Ribeiro RF, Mattos MGC. 2012. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution on different bony ridges with different lengths of Morse taper implants and prosthesis dimensions. J Craniofac Surg. 23(6):1888–1892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toniollo MB, Macedo AP, Pupim D, Zaparolli D, Mattos MGC. 2017. Finite element analysis of bone stress in the posterior mandible using regular and short implants, in the same context, with splinted and non-splinted prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 32(4):199–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Mises R. 1913. Mechanik der festen Körper im plastisch deformablen Zustand. Göttin. Nachr. Math. Phys. 1:582–592.
   Google Scholar
• Wang TM, Leu LJ, Wang JS. 2002. Effects of prosthesis materials and prosthesis splinting on peri-implant bone stress around implants in poor-quality bone: a numeric analysis. Int J Oral Maxill Implants. 17(2):231–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zitzmann NU, Marinello CP. 2000. Treatment outcomes of fixed or removable implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. Part II: clinical findings. J Prosthet Dent. 83(4):434–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembic A, Wismeijer D. 2014. Patient-reported outcomes of maxillary implant-supported overdentures compared with conventional dentures. Clin Oral Implants Res. 25(4):441–450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar