Bicuspid aortic valve aortopathies: An hemodynamics characterization in dilated aortas

References

• Atkins SK, Cao K, Rajamannan NM, Sucosky P. 2014. Bicuspid aortic valve hemodynamics induces abnormal medial remodeling in the convexity of porcine ascending aortas. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 13(6):1209–1225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avolio AP. 1980. Physiological simulation of blood flow in the aorta: Multi-branched model of the human arterial system. Med Biol Eng Comput. 18(6):709–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azadani AN, Chitsaz S, Matthews PB, Jaussaud N, Leung J, Tsinman T, Ge L, Tseng EE. 2012. Comparison of mechanical properties of human ascending aorta and aortic sinuses. Ann Thorac Surg. 93(1):87–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker AJ, Lanning C, Shandas R. 2010. Quantification of hemodynamic wall shear stress in patients with bicuspid aortic valve using phase-contrast MRI. Ann Biomed Eng. 38(3):788–800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker AJ, Markl M, Bürk J, Lorenz R, Bock J, Bauer S, Schulz-Menger J, von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F. 2012. Bicuspid aortic valve is associated with altered wall shear stress in the ascending aorta. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 5(4):457–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazilevs Y, Calo V, Tezduyar T, Hughes T. 2007. YZ β discontinuity capturing for advection-dominated processes with application to arterial drug delivery. Int J Numer Meth Fluids. 54(6–8):593–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bissell MM, Hess AT, Biasiolli L, Glaze SJ, Loudon M, Pitcher A, Davis A, Prendergast B, Markl M, Barker AJ, et al. 2013. Aortic dilation in bicuspid aortic valve disease: flow pattern is a major contributor and differs with valve fusion type. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 6(4):499–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonomi D, Vergara C, Faggiano E, Stevanella M, Conti C, Redaelli A, Puppini G, Faggian G, Formaggia L, Luciani GB. 2015. Influence of the aortic valve leaflets on the fluid-dynamics in aorta in presence of a normally functioning bicuspid valve. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 14(6):1349–1361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao K, Sucosky P. 2016. Computational comparison of regional stress and deformation characteristics in tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valve leaflets. Int J Numer Meth Biomed Engng. 33(3):e02798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao K, BukaČ M, Sucosky P. 2016. Three-dimensional macro-scale assessment of regional and temporal wall shear stress characteristics on aortic valve leaflets. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 19(6):603–613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao K, Atkins SK, McNally A, Liu J, Sucosky P. 2017. Simulations of morphotype-dependent hemodynamics in non-dilated bicuspid aortic valve aortas. J Biomech. 50:63–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corte A, Romano G, Tizzano F, Amarelli C, De Santo L, De Feo M, Scardone M, Dialetto G, Covino F, Cotrufo M. 2006. Echocardiographic anatomy of ascending aorta dilatation: Correlations with aortic valve morphology and function. Int J Cardiol. 113(3):320–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corte A, Bancone C, Quarto C, Dialetto G, Covino F, Scardone M, Caianiello G, Cotrufo M. 2007. Predictors of ascending aortic dilatation with bicuspid aortic valve: a wide spectrum of disease expression. Eur J Cardiothorac. 31:397–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faggiano E, Formaggia L, Antiga L. 2013. An open-source tool for patient-specific fluid-structure vessel mesh generation. Fifth International Symposium on Modelling of Physiological Flows; Chia Laguna, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Faggiano E, Antiga L, Puppini G, Quarteroni A, Luciani G, Vergara C. 2013. Helical flows and asymmetry of blood jet in dilated ascending aorta with normally functioning bicuspid valve. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 12(4):801–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez M, Formaggia L, Gerbeau JF, Quarteroni A. 2009. The derivation of the equations for fluids and structure. In: Formaggia L, Quarteroni A, Veneziani A, editors. Cardiovascular Mathematics. Modeling and simulation of the circulatory system. Milano: Springer; p. 76–121.
   Google Scholar
• Grewa N, Groot A, Poelmann R, Klautz R, Lindeman J, Goumans M, Palmen M, Mohamed S, Sievers H, Bogers A, DeRuiter M. 2014. Ascending aorta dilation in association with bicuspid aortic valve: A maturation defect of the aortic wall. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 148(4):1583–1590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guntheroth WG. 2008. A critical review of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association practice guidelines on bicuspid aortic valve with dilated ascending aorta. Am J Cardiol. 102(1):107–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindmarsh AC, Brown PN, Grant KE, Lee SL, Serban R, Shumaker DE, Woodward CS. 2005. Sundials: Suite of nonlinear and differential/algebraic equation solvers. ACM Trans Math Softw. 31(3):363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope MD, Hope TA, Meadows AK, Ordovas KG, Urbania TH, Alley MT, Higgins CB. 2010. Bicuspid aortic valve: four-dimensional MR evaluation of ascending aortic systolic flow patterns. Radiology. 255(1):53–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janela J, Moura A, Sequeira A. 2010. Absorbing boundary conditions for a 3D non-Newtonian fluid-structure interaction model for blood flow in arteries. J Eng Sci. 48(11):1332–1349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang J, Song H, Yang D, Baek S, Kim D, Song J, Kang D, Lim T, Song J. 2013. Association between bicuspid aortic valve phenotype and patterns of valvular dysfunction and bicuspid aortopathy: Comprehensive evaluation using MDCT and echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 6(2):150–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keane MG, Wiegers SE, Plappert T, Pochettino A, Bavaria JE, Sutton MG. 2000. Bicuspid aortic valves are associated with aortic dilatation out of proportion to coexistent valvular lesions. Circulation. 102(19 Suppl 3):III35–III39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura N, Nakamura M, Komiya K, Nishi S, Yamaguchi A, Tanaka O, Misawa Y, Adachi H, Kawahito K. 2017. Patient-specific assessment of hemodynamics by computational fluid dynamics in patients with bicuspid aortopathy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 153(4):52–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaDisa JF, Jr, Taylor CA, Feinstein JA. 2010. Aortic coarctation: recent developments in experimental and computational methods to assess treatments for this simple condition. Prog Pediatr Cardiol. 30(1):45–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lantz J, Renner J, Karlsson M. 2011. Wall shear stress in a subject specific human aorta influence of fluid-structure interaction. Int J Appl Mechanics. 3(4):759–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahadevia R, Barker AJ, Schnell S, Entezari P, Kansal P, Fedak PW, Malaisrie SC, McCarthy P, Collins J, Carr J, Markl M. 2014. Bicuspid aortic cusp fusion morphology alters aortic three-dimensional outflow patterns, wall shear stress, and expression of aortopathy. Circulation. 129(6):673–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markl M, Kilner P, Ebbers T. 2011. Comprehensive 4D velocity mapping of the heart and great vessels by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 13(7):1–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marom G, Kim HS, Rosenfeld M, Raanani E, Haj–Ali R, Luca A, Pilato M, Scardulla C. 2013. Fully coupled fluid-structure interaction model of congenital bicuspid aortic valves: effect of asymmetry on hemodynamics. Med Biol Eng Comput. 51(8):839–848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendez V, Di Giuseppe M, Pasta S. 2018. Comparison of hemodynamic and structural indices of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm as predicted by 2-way FSI, CFD rigid wall simulation and patient-specific displacement-based FEA. Comput Bio Med. 100:221–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neil ML, Kerckhoffs R. 2010. Current progress in patient-specific modeling. Brief Bioinform. 11(1):111–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padang R, Bannon PG, Jeremy R, Richmond DR, Semsarian C, Vallely M, Wilson M, Yan TD. 2013. The genetic and molecular basis of bicuspid aortic valve associated thoracic aortopathy: a link to phenotype heterogeneity. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2(1):83–91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parker K, Thiriet M. 2009. Physiology and pathology of the cardiovascular system: a physical perspective. In: Formaggia L, Quarteroni A, Veneziani A, editors. Cardiovascular Mathematics. Modeling and simulation of the circulatory system. Milano: Springer; pp. 1–47.
   Google Scholar
• Pasta S, Rinaudo A, Luca A, Pilato M, Scardulla C, Gleason TG, Vorp DA. 2013. Difference in hemodynamic and wall stress of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve. J Biomech. 46(10):1729–1738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasta S, Gentile G, Raffa GM, Scardulla F, Bellavia D, Luca A, Pilato M, Scardulla C. 2017. Three–dimensional parametric modeling of bicuspid aortopathy and comparison with computational flow predictions. Artif Organs. 41(9):92–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petra CG, Schenk O, Lubin M, Gäertner K. 2014. An augmented incomplete factorization approach for computing the schur complement in stochastic optimization. SIAM J Sci Comput. 36(2):C139–C162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piatti P, Sturla F, Bissell M, Pirola S, Lombardi M, Nesteruk I, Della Corte A, Redaelli A, Votta E. 2017. 4D flow analysis of BAV-related fluid-dynamic alterations: evidences of wall shear stress alterations in absence of clinically-relevant aortic anatomical remodeling. Front Physiol. 8(441):1–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reymond P, Crosetto P, Deparis S, Quarteroni A, Stergiopulos N. 2013. Physiological simulation of blood flow in the aorta: Comparison of hemodynamic indices as predicted by 3-D FSI, 3-D rigid wall and 1-D models. Med Eng Phys. 35(6):784–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards KE, Deserranno D, Donal E, Greenberg NL, Thomas JD, Garcia MJ. 2004. Influence of structural geometry on the severity of bicuspid aortic stenosis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 287(3):1410–1416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinaudo A, Pasta S. 2014. Regional variation of wall shear stress in ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 228(6):627–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Palomares JF, Dux-Santoy L, Guala A, Kale A, Maldonado G, Teixido-Tura G, Galian L, Huguet M, Valente F, Gutierrez L, et al. 2018. Aortic flow patterns and wall shear stress maps by 4D-flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the assessment of aortic dilatation in bicuspid aortic valve disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 20(28):1–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tonimato R, Salmon J, Susin F, Ducci A, Burriesci G. 2016. Physiological vortices in the sinuses of Valsalva: An in vitro approach for bio-prosthetic valve. J Biomech. 43(13):2635–2643.
   Google Scholar