An interactive surgical simulation tool to assess the consequences of a partial glossectomy on a biomechanical model of the tongue

References

• Van Alphen MJA, Kreeft AM, Van Der Heijden F, Smeele LE, Balm A. 2013. Towards virtual surgery in oral cancer to predict postoperative oral functions preoperatively. Br J Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 51(8):747–751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blemker SS, Pinsky PM, Delp SL. 2005. A 3D model of muscle reveals the causes of nonuniform strains in the biceps brachii. J Biomech. 38(4):657–665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyé S, Guennebaud G, Schlick C. 2010. Least squares subdivision surfaces. Comput Graph Forum. 29(7):2011–2290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braillon A. 2017. Independence is critical for shared decision making. BMJ. 358: j3286.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buchaillard S, Brix M, Perrier P, Payan Y. 2007. Simulations of the consequences of tongue surgery on tongue mobility: Implications for speech production in post-surgery conditions. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg. 3(3):252–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchaillard S, Perrier P, Payan Y. 2009. A biomechanical model of cardinal vowel production: muscle activations and the impact of gravity on tongue positioning. J Acoust Soc Am. 126(4):2033–2051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cignoni P, Cignoni P, Callieri M, Callieri M, Corsini M, Corsini M, Dellepiane M, Dellepiane M, Ganovelli F, Ganovelli F, et al. 2008. MeshLab: An open-source mesh processing tool. Sixth Eurographics Ital. Chapter Conf. 129–136.
   Google Scholar
• Costa Bandeira AK, Azevedo EHM, Vartanian JG, Nishimoto IN, Kowalski LP, Carrara-De Angelis E. 2008. Quality of life related to swallowing after tongue cancer treatment. Dysphagia. 23(2):183–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csimsoft [accessed 2018 Jul 3]. http://www.csimsoft.com/boltoverview
   Google Scholar
• Dabbaghchian S, Arnela M, Engwall O, Guasch O, Stavness I, Badin P, Grup GTM, Mèdia T, Salle L, Llull UR, et al. 2016. Using a biomechanical model and articulatory data for the numerical production of vowels. DiVA. 3569–3573.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk S, van Alphen MJA, Jacobi I, Smeele LE, van der Heijden F, Balm A. 2016. A new accurate 3d measurement tool to assess the range of motion of the tongue in oral cancer patients: A standardized model. Dysphagia. 31(1):97–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujita S, Dang J, Suzuki N, Honda K. 2007. A Computational tongue model and its clinical application. Oral Sci. Int. 4(2):97–109.
   Google Scholar
• Gaige, Terry A., Thomas Benner, Ruopeng Wang, Van J. Wedeen, and Richard J. Gilbert. 2007. “Three Dimensional Myoarchitecture of the Human Tongue Determined in Vivo by Diffusion Tensor Imaging with Tractography.” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 26(3):654–61.
   Google Scholar
• Gérard J-M, Perrier P, Payan Y. 2006. 3D biomechanical tongue modeling to study speech production. Speech Prod. Model. Phonetic Process. Tech. 85–102.
   Google Scholar
• Gérard J-M, Wilhelms-Tricarico R, Perrier P, Payan Y. 2003. A 3D dynamical biomechanical tongue model to study speech motor control. Res Dev Biomech. 1:49–64.
   Google Scholar
• Gerard JM, Ohayon J, Luboz V, Perrier P, Payan Y. 2005. Non-linear elastic properties of the lingual and facial tissues assessed by indentation technique. Application to the biomechanics of speech production. Med Eng Phys. 27(10):884–892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, Richard J. et al. 2006. “Three-Dimensional Myoarchitecture of the Bovine Tongue Demonstrated by Diffusion Spectrum Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Tractography.” Anatomical Record - Part A Discoveries in Molecular, Cellular, and Evolutionary Biology 288(11):1173–82.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta N, Gupta R, Acharya AK, Patthi B, Goud V, Reddy S, Garg A, Singla A. 2016. Changing Trends in oral cancer - a global scenario. Nepal J Epidemiol. 6(4):613–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harandi NM, Woo J, Stone M, Abugharbieh R, Fels S. 2014. Subject-specific biomechanical modelling of the tongue: Analysis of muscle activations during speech. Proc Int Semin Speech Prod. 174–177.
   Google Scholar
• Hermant N, Perrier P, Payan Y. 2017. Human tongue biomechanical modeling. In Payan Y, Ohayon JBT-B of LO, editors. Biomechanics of living organs series. Oxford: Academic Press; 395–411.
   Google Scholar
• Honda K, Murano EZE, Takano S, Masaki S, Dang J. 2013. Anatomical considerations on the extrinsic tongue muscles for articulatory modeling. Proc Meet Acoust. 19:60270.
   Google Scholar
• Kreeft AM, van der Molen L, Hilgers FJ, Balm AJ. 2009. Speech and swallowing after surgical treatment of advanced oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma: A systematic review of the literature. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 266(11):1687–1698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreeft AM, Tan IB, Van Den Brekel MWM, Hilgers FJ, Balm A. J. 2009. The surgical dilemma of “functional inoperability” in oral and oropharyngeal cancer: Current consensus on operability with regard to functional results. Clin. Otolaryngol. 34(2):140–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd JE. 2014. ArtiSynth Reference Manual. [accessed 2018 Jun 5]. https://www.artisynth.org/Documentation/ArtisynthRefManual
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd JE, Stavness I, Fels S. 2012. ArtiSynth: A fast interactive biomechanical modeling toolkit combining multibody and finite element simulation. In Payan Y. editor. Soft tissue biomechanical modeling for computer assisted surgery. Springer; 355–394.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Molen L, Van Rossum MA, Burkhead LM, Smeele LE, Hilgers F. 2009. Functional outcomes and rehabilitation strategies in patients treated with chemoradiotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer: A systematic review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 266(6):889–900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore SR, Johnson NW, Pierce A. M, Wilson DF. 2000. The epidemiology of mouth cancer: a review of global incidence. Oral Dis. 6(2):65–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosier K, Liu WC, Behin B, Lee C, Baredes S. 2005. Cortical adaptation following partial glossectomy with primary closure: Implications for reconstruction of the oral tongue. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 114(9):681–687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mu L, Sanders I. 2010. Human tongue neuroanatomy: Nerve supply and motor endplates. Clin Anat. 23(7):777–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NIH 2007. NLM’s Current Bibliographies in Medicine, Visible Human Project®. [accessed 2018 Jul 3]. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/archive/20120907/pubs/cbm/visible_human_2007.html
   Google Scholar
• Rohan P-Y, Lobos C, Nazari M. A, Perrier P, Payan Y. 2017. Finite element models of the human tongue: A mixed-element mesh approach. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng Imaging Vis. 5(6): 390–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders I, Mu L. 2013. A three-dimensional atlas of human tongue muscles. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 296(7):1102–1114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sessions DG, Spector GJ, Lenox J, Haughey B, Chao C, Marks J. 2002. Analysis of treatment results for oral tongue cancer. The Laryngoscope. 112(4): 616–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah J, Gil Z. 2009. Current concepts in management of oral cancer-surgery. Oral Oncol. 45(4–5):394–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speksnijder CM, Van Der Bilt A, Van Der Glas HW, Koole R, Merkx M. 2011. Tongue function in patients treated for malignancies in tongue and/or floor of mouth; A one year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 40(12):1388–1394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavness I, Lloyd JE, Fels S. 2012. Automatic prediction of tongue muscle activations using a finite element model. J Biomech. 45(16):2841–2848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Alphen, M. J. A., M. Eskes, L. E. Smeele, A. J. M. Balm, and F. van der Heijden. 2017. “In Vivo Intraoperative Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Quantitative Tongue Motion Analysis.” Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging & Visualization 5(6):409–15.
   Google Scholar
• Vogt F, Lloyd J, Buchaillard S, Perrier P, Chabanas M, Payan Y, Fels S. 2006. Efficient 3D finite element modeling of a muscle-activated tongue. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 19–28.
   Google Scholar
• Warnakulasuriya S. 2009. Global epidemiology of oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncol. 45(4-5):309–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelms-Tricarico R. 2000. Development of a tongue and mouth floor model for normalization and biomechanical modelling,” in Proceedings of the Fifth Speech Production Seminar and CREST Workshop on Models of Speech Production. Kloster Seeon, Bavaria.
   Google Scholar
• Wu X, Dang J, Stavness I. 2014. Iterative method to estimate muscle activation with a physiological articulatory model. Acoust Sci Technol. 35: 201–212.
   Google Scholar
• Yousefi AAK, Nazari MA, Perrier P, Panahi MS, Payan Y. 2018. A visco-hyperelastic constitutive model and its application in bovine tongue tissue. J Biomech. 71: 190–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yudkin JS, Kavanagh J, McCormack JP. 2016. Guidelines for treating risk factors should include tools for shared decision making. BMJ. 353: i3147.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar