A screening method to analyse the sensitivity of a lower limb multibody kinematic model

References

• Ackland D, Lin YC, Pandy M. 2012. Sensitivity of model predictions of muscle function to changes in moment arms and muscle-tendon properties: a Monte-Carlo analysis. J Biomech. 45(8):1463–1471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin M, Laz P, Stowe J, Rullkoetter P. 2009. Efficient probabilistic representation of tibiofemoral soft tissue constraint. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 12(6):651–659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begon M, Andersen M, Dumas R. 2018. Multibody kinematics optimization for the estimation of upper and lower limb human joint kinematics: a systematized methodological. Review. J Biomech Eng. 140(3):030801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosmans L, Valente G, Wesseling M, Van Campen A, De Groote F, De Schutter J, Jonkers I. 2015. Sensitivity of predicted muscle forces during gait to anatomical variability in musculotendon geometry. J Biomech. 48(10):2116–2123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brito da Luz S, Modenese L, Sancisi N, Mills P, Kennedy B, Beck B, Lloyd D. 2017. Feasibility of using MRIs to create subject-specific parallel-mechanism joint models. J Biomech. 53:45–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camomilla V, Dumas R, Cappozzo A. 2017. Human movement analysis: the soft tissue artefact issue. J Biomech. 62:1–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campolongo F, Cariboni J, Saltelli A. 2007. An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models. Environ Model Softw. 22(10):1509–1518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campolongo F, Saltelli A, Cariboni J. 2011. From screening to quantitative sensitivity analysis: a unified approach. Comput Phys Commun. 182(4):978–988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbone V, van der Krogt M, Koopman H, Verdonschot N. 2012. Sensitivity of subject-specific models to errors in musculo-skeletal geometry. J Biomech. 45(14):2476–2480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charbonnier C, Chagué S, Kolo F, Duthon V, Menetrey J. 2017. Multi-body optimization with subject-specific knee models: performance at high knee flexion angles. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 20:1571–1579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clément J, Dumas R, Hagemeister N, de Guise J. 2015. Soft tissue artifact compensation in knee kinematics by multi-body optimization: performance of subject-specific knee joint models. J Biomech. 48(14):3796–3802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groote F, Van Campen A, Jonkers I, De Schutter J. 2010. Sensitivity of dynamic simulations of gait and dynamometer experiments to hill muscle model parameters of knee flexors and extensors. J Biomech. 43(10):1876–1883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Gregorio R, Parenti-Castelli V, O’Connor J, Leardini A. 2007. Mathematical models of passive motion at the human ankle joint by equivalent spatial parallel mechanisms. Med Bio Eng Comput. 45:305–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duprey S, Cheze L, Dumas R. 2010. Influence of joint constraints on lower limb kinematics estimation from skin markers using global optimization. J Biomech. 43(14):2858–2862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Habachi A, Moissenet F, Duprey S, Cheze L, Dumas R. 2015. Global sensitivity analysis of the joint kinematics during gait to the parameters of a lower limb multi-body model. Med Biol Eng Comput. 53(7):655–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feikes JD, O'Connor JJ, Zavatsky AB. 2003. A constraint-based approach to modelling the mobility of the human knee joint. J Biomech. 36(1):125–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaffney B, Christiansen C, Murray A, Myers C, Laz P, Davidson B. 2017. The effects of prosthesis inertial parameters on inverse dynamics: a probabilistic analysis. J Verif Valid Uncert. 2(3):031003.
   Google Scholar
• Gasparutto X, Sancisi N, Jacquelin E, Parenti-Castelli V, Dumas R. 2015. Validation of a multi-body optimization with knee kinematic models including ligament constraints. J Biomech. 48(6):1141–1146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamberto G, Martelli S, Cappozzo A, Mazzà C. 2017. To what extent is joint and muscle mechanics predicted by musculoskeletal models sensitive to soft tissue artefacts? J Biomech. 62:68–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langenderfer J, Laz P, Petrella A, Rullkoetter P. 2008. An efficient probabilistic methodology for incorporating uncertainty in body segment parameters and anatomical landmarks in joint loadings estimated from inverse dynamics. J Biomech Eng. 130(1):014502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leardini A, Belvedere C, Nardini F, Sancisi N, Conconi M, Parenti-Castelli V. 2017. Kinematic models of lower limb joints for musculo-skeletal modelling and optimization in gait analysis. J Biomech. 62:77–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martelli S, Valente G, Viceconti M, Taddei F. 2015. Sensitivity of a subject-specific musculoskeletal model to the uncertainties on the joint axes location. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 18:1555–1563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay M, Beckman R, Conover W. 1979. Comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics. 21:239–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris M. 1991. Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics. 33(2):161–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers C, Laz P, Shelburne K, Davidson B. 2015. A probabilistic approach to quantify the impact of uncertainty propagation in musculoskeletal simulations. Ann Biomed Eng. 43(5):1098–1111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navacchia A, Myers C, Rullkoetter P, Shelburne K. 2016. Prediction of in vivo knee joint loads using a global probabilistic analysis. J Biomech Eng. 138(3):031002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal S, Langenderfer J, Stowe J, Laz P, Petrella A, Rullkoetter P. 2007. Probabilistic modeling of knee muscle moment arms: effects of methods, origin-insertion, and kinematic variability. Ann Biomed Eng. 35(9):1632–1642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pàmies-Vilà R, Font-Llagunes J, Cuadrado J, Alonso F. 2012. Analysis of different uncertainties in the inverse dynamic analysis of human gait. Mech Mach Theory. 58:153–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redl C, Gfoehler M, Pandy M. 2007. Sensitivity of muscle force estimates to variations in muscle-tendon properties. Hum Mov Sci. 26(2):306–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinbolt J, Haftka R, Chmielewski T, Fregly B. 2007. Are patient-specific joint and inertial parameters necessary for accurate inverse dynamics analyses of gait? IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 54(5):782–793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltelli A, Chan K, Scott E. 2000. Sensitivity analysis. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Saltelli A, Tarantola S, Campolongo F, Ratto M. 2004. Sensitivity analysis in pratice. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Sancisi N, Gasparutto X, Parenti-Castelli V, Dumas R. 2017. A multi-body optimization framework with a knee kinematic model including articular contacts and ligaments. Meccanica. 52(3):695–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sancisi N, Parenti-Castelli V. 2011. A new kinematic model of the passive motion of the knee inclusive of the patella. J Mechanisms Robotics. 3(4):041003.
   Google Scholar
• Scovil C, Ronsky J. 2006. Sensitivity of a hill-based muscle model to perturbations in model parameters. J Biomech. 39(11):2055–2063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva M, Ambrósio J. 2004. Sensitivity of the results produced by the inverse dynamic analysis of a human stride to perturbed input data. Gait Posture. 19:35–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smale K, Conconi M, Sancisi N, Krogsgaard M, Alkjaer T, Parenti-Castelli V, Benoit D. 2019. Effect of implementing magnetic resonance imaging for patient-specific opensim models on lower-body kinematics and knee ligament lengths. J Biomech. 83:9–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith C, Lenhart R, Kaiser J, Vignos M, Thelen D. 2016. Influence of ligament properties on tibiofemoral mechanics in walking. J Knee Surg. 29(2):99–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente G, Pitto L, Stagni R, Taddei F. 2015. Effect of lower-limb joint models on subject-specific musculoskeletal models and simulations of daily motor activities. J Biomech. 48:198–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente G, Pitto L, Testi D, Seth A, Delp S, Stagni R, Viceconti M, Taddei F. 2014. Are subject-specific musculoskeletal models robust to the uncertainties in parameter identification? PLoS One. 9(11):e112625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesseling M, de Groote F, Jonkers I. 2014. The effect of perturbing body segment parameters on calculated joint moments and muscle forces during gait. J Biomech. 47(2):596–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu G, Siegler S, Allard P, Kirtley C, Leardini A, Rosenbaum D, Whittle M, D’Lima DD, Cristofolini L, Witte H, et al. 2002. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion—part I: ankle, hip, and spine. Journal of Biomechanics. 35(4):543–548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao M, Higginson J. 2010. Sensitivity of estimated muscle force in forward simulation of normal walking. J Appl Biomech. 26(2):142–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar