Numerical study of hemodynamics in brain aneurysms treated with flow diverter stents using porous medium theory

References

• Arvo J. 1991. Graphics gems II. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asgharzadeh H, Borazjani I. 2016. Effects of Reynolds and Womersley numbers on the hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms. Comput Math Methods Med 2016:1.
   Google Scholar
• Augsburger L, Reymond P, Rufenacht DA, Stergiopulos N. 2011. Intracranial stents being modeled as a porous medium: flow simulation in stented cerebral aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng. 39(2):850–863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babiker MH. 2013. The effects of endovascular treatment parameters on cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University.
   Google Scholar
• Babiker MH, Chong B, Gonzalez LF, Cheema S, Frakes DH. 2013. Finite element modeling of embolic coil deployment: Multifactor characterization of treatment effects on cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics. J Biomech. 46(16):2809–2816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babiker MH, Gonzalez LF, Ryan J, Albuquerque F, Collins D, Elvikis A, Frakes DH. 2012. Influence of stent configuration on cerebral aneurysm fluid dynamics. J Biomech. 45(3):440–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carman PC. 1956. Flow of gases through porous media. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhury RA, Herrmann M, Frakes DH, Adrian RJ. 2015. Length and time for development of laminar flow in tubes following a step increase of volume flux. Exp Fluids. 56:22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dazeo N, Dottori J, Boroni G, Larrabide I. 2018. A comparative study of porous medium CFD models for flow diverter stents: advantages and shortcomings. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 34(12):e3145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ham F, Iaccarino G. 2004. Energy conservation in collocated discretization schemes on unstructured meshes. Ann Res Briefs. 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu CT, Cheng P. 1990. Thermal dispersion in a porous medium. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 33(8):1587–1597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulcsár Z, Ernemann U, Wetzel SG, Bock A, Goericke S, Panagiotopoulos V, Forsting M, Ruefenacht DA, Wanke I. 2010. High-profile flow diverter (Silk) implantation in the basilar artery. Stroke. 41(8):1690–1696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Zhang M, Verrelli DI, Chong W, Ohta M, Qian Y. 2018. Numerical simulation of aneurysmal haemodynamics with calibrated porous-medium models of flow-diverting stents. J Biomech. 80:88–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Vasilyev OV. 2007. A Brinkman penalization method for compressible flows in complex geometries. Comput Phys. 227(2):946–966.
   Google Scholar
• Morales HG, Bonnefous O. 2014. Modeling hemodynamics after flow diverter with a porous medium, in: 2014 IEEE 11th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI). Presented at the 2014 IEEE 11th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), pp. 1324–1327.
   Google Scholar
• Morales HG, Bonnefous O, Geers AJ, Brina O, Pereira VM, Spelle L, Moret J, Larrabide I. 2016. Does arterial flow rate affect the assessment of flow-diverter stent performance? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 37(12):2293–2298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mut F, Löhner R, Chien A, Tateshima S, Viñuela F, Putman C, Cebral J. 2011. Computational hemodynamics framework for the analysis of cerebral aneurysms. Int j Numer Meth Biomed Engng. 27(6):822–839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mut F, Raschi M, Scrivano E, Bleise C, Chudyk J, Ceratto R, Lylyk P, Cebral JR. 2015. Association between hemodynamic conditions and occlusion times after flow diversion in cerebral aneurysms. J Neurointervent Surg. 7(4):286–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair P, Chong BW, Indahlastari A, Ryan J, Workman C, Haithem Babiker M, Yadollahi Farsani H, Baccin CE, Frakes D. 2016. Hemodynamic characterization of geometric cerebral aneurysm templates treated with embolic coils. J Biomech Eng. 138(2):021011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittal R, Iaccarino G. 2005. Immersed boundary methods. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 37(1):239–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raschi M, Mut F, Löhner R, Cebral JR. 2014. Strategy for modeling flow diverters in cerebral aneurysms as a porous medium. Int J Numer Meth Biomed Engng. 30(9):909–925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roache PJ. 1994. Perspective: a method for uniform reporting of grid refinement studies. J Fluids Eng. 116(3):405–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roszelle BN, Nair P, Gonzalez LF, Haithem Babiker M, Ryan J, Frakes D. 2014. Comparison among different high porosity stent configurations: hemodynamic effects of treatment in a large cerebral aneurysm. J Biomech Eng. 136(2):021013–021019. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4026257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seong J, Wakhloo AK, Lieber BB. 2007. In vitro evaluation of flow divertors in an elastase-induced saccular aneurysm model in rabbit. J Biomech Eng. 129:863–872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheard GJ. 2009. Flow dynamics and wall shear-stress variation in a fusiform aneurysm. J Eng Math. 64(4):379–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremmel M, Dhar S, Levy EI, Mocco J, Meng H. 2009. Influence of intracranial aneurysm-to-parent vessel size ratio on hemodynamics and implication for rupture: results from a virtual experimental study. Neurosurgery. 64(4):622–630. Discussion 630–631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitaker S. 1998. The method of volume averaging. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Yadollahi-Farsani H, Herrmann M, Frakes D, Chong B. 2018. A new method for simulating embolic coils as heterogeneous porous media. Cardiovasc Eng Tech. 10(1):32–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Chong W, Qian Y. 2013. Investigation of intracranial aneurysm hemodynamics following flow diverter stent treatment. Med Eng Phys. 35(5):608–615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar