An automated magnetoencephalographic data cleaning algorithm

References

• Barbati G, Porcaro C, Zappasodi F, Rossini PM, Tecchio F. 2004. Optimization of an independent component analysis approach for artifact identification and removal in magnetoencephalographic signals. Clin Neurophysiol. 115(5):1220–1232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigdely-Shamlo N, Mullen T, Kothe C, Su K-M, Robbins KA. 2015. The PREP pipeline: standardized preprocessing for large-scale EEG analysis. Front Neuroinform. 9:16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma M, Smit DJ, Boomsma DI, De Geus EJ, Delemarre-van de Waal HA, Stam CJ. 2013. Growing trees in child brains: graph theoretical analysis of electroencephalography-derived minimum spanning tree in 5- and 7-year-old children reflects brain maturation. Brain Connectivity. 3(1):50–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bruns A, Eckhorn R, Jokeit H, Ebner A. 2000. Amplitude envelope correlation detects coupling among incoherent brain signals. Neuroreport. 11(7):1509–1514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Cheveign A, Simon JZ. 2007. Denoising based on time-shift PCA. J Neurosci Methods. 165(2):297–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Cheveign A, Simon JZ. 2008. Denoising based on spatial filtering. J Neurosci Methods. 171:331–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Cheveigné A. 2016. Sparse time artifact removal. J Neurosci Methods. 262:14–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman LC. 1977. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry. 40(1):35–41.
   Google Scholar
• Gong G, He Y, Concha L, Lebel C, Gross DW, Evans AC, Beaulieu C. 2009. Mapping anatomical connectivity patterns of human cerebral cortex using in vivo diffusion tensor imaging tractography. Cereb Cortex. 19(3):524–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramfort A, Luessi M, Larson E, Engemann DA, Strohmeier D, Brodbeck C, Parkkonen L, Hämäläinen MS. 2014. MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data. Neuroimage. 86:446–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross J, Baillet S, Barnes GR, Henson RN, Hillebrand A, Jensen O, Jerbi K, Litvak V, Maess B, Oostenveld R. 2013. Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research. Neuroimage. 65:349–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillebrand A, Stam CJ. 2014. Recent developments in MEG network analysis. In: Supek S, Aine C, editors. Magnetoencephalography. New York (NY): Springer. pp. 263–277.
   Google Scholar
• Jas M, Engemann DA, Bekhti Y, Raimondo F, Gramfort A. 2017. Autoreject: automated artifact rejection for MEG and EEG data. Neuroimage. 159417–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawakatsu M. 2003. Application of ICA to MEG noise reduction. Presented at the 4th International Symposium on Independent Component Analysis and Blind Signal Separation (ICA2003), volume 1, pp. 535–541.
   Google Scholar
• Kayser J, Tenke CE. 2006. Principal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying ERP generator patterns: I. Evaluation with auditory oddball tasks. Clin Neurophysiol. 117(2):348–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagerlund TD, Sharbrough FW, Busacker NE. 1997. Spatial filtering of multichannel electroencephalographic recordings through principal component analysis by singular value decomposition. J Clin Neurophysiol. 14(1):73–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman MEJ. 2002. Mixing patterns in networks. arXiv:cond-mat/0209450.
   Google Scholar
• Nolan H, Whelan R, Reilly R. 2010. FASTER: fully automated statistical thresholding for EEG artifact rejection. J Neurosci Methods. 192(1):152–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oostenveld R, Fries P, Maris E, Schoffelen J-M. 2011. FieldTrip: open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011:156869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rombetto S, Granata C, Vettoliere A, Russo M. 2014. Multichannel system based on a high sensitivity superconductive sensor for magnetoencephalography. Sensors (Basel). 14(7):12114–12126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadasivan P, Dutt DN. 1996. SVD based technique for noise reduction in electroencephalographic signals. Signal Processing. 55(2):179–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stam C, Tewarie P, Van Dellen E, Van Straaten E, Hillebrand A, Van Mieghem P. 2014. The trees and the forest: characterization of complex brain networks with minimum spanning trees. Int J Psychophysiol. 92(3):129–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stam CJ, Nolte G, Daffertshofer A. 2007. Phase lag index: assessment of functional connectivity from multi channel EEG and MEG with diminished bias from common sources. Hum Brain Mapp. 28(11):1178–1193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadel F, Baillet S, Mosher JC, Pantazis D, Leahy RM. 2011. Brainstorm: a user-friendly application for MEG/EEG analysis. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011:879716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taulu S, Hari R. 2009. Removal of magnetoencephalographic artifacts with temporal signal-space separation: demonstration with single-trial auditory-evoked responses. Hum Brain Mapp. 30(5):1524–1534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taulu S, Simola J, Kajola M. 2005. Applications of the signal space separation method. IEEE Trans Signal Process. 53(9):3359–3372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewarie P, van Dellen E, Hillebrand A, Stam CJ. 2015. The minimum spanning tree: an unbiased method for brain network analysis. Neuroimage. 104:177–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N, Mazoyer B, Joliot M. 2002. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage. 15(1):273–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Veen BD, Van Drongelen W, Yuchtman M, Suzuki A. 1997. Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 44(9):867–880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wijk BC, Stam CJ, Daffertshofer A. 2010. Comparing brain networks of different size and connectivity density using graph theory. PLoS One. 5(10):e13701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigário R, Jousmäki V, Hämäläinen M, Hari R, Oja E. 1998. Independent component analysis for identification of artifacts in magnetoencephalographic recordings. In: Jordan MI, Kearns MJ, Solla SA, editors. Advances in neural information processing systems. London (UK): MIT Press. pp 229–235.
   Google Scholar