Parallel splitting solvers for the isogeometric analysis of the Cahn-Hilliard equation

References

• Allen SM, Cahn JW. 1979. A microscopic theory for antiphase boundary motion and its application to antiphase domain coarsening. Acta Metall. 27(6):1085–1095.
   Google Scholar
• Borden MJ, Verhoosel CV, Scott MA, Hughes TJR, Landis CM. 2012. A phase-field description of dynamic brittle fracture. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 217:77–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahn JW. 1961. On spinodal decomposition. Acta Metall. 9(9):795–801.
   Google Scholar
• Cahn JW, Hilliard JE. 1958. Free energy of a nonuniform system. I. Interfacial free energy. J Chem Phys. 28(2):258–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaplain MA, McDougall SR, Anderson A. 2006. Mathematical modeling of tumor induced angiogenesis. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 8(1):233–257.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen LQ. 2002. Phase-field models for microstructure evolution. Annu Rev Mater Res. 32(1):113–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colli P, Gilardi G, Hilhorst D. 2014. On a Cahn-Hilliard type phase field system related to tumor growth. Discr Cont Dynam Syst–A. 35(6):2423–2442. arXiv Preprint arXiv:14015943.
   Google Scholar
• Cristini V, Li X, Lowengrub JS, Wise SM. 2009. Nonlinear simulations of solid tumor growth using a mixture model: invasion and branching. J Math Biol. 58(4–5):723–763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristini V, Lowengrub J. 2010. Multiscale modeling of cancer: an integrated experimental and mathematical modeling approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demkowicz L. 2006. Computing with hp-adaptive finite element method. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis, CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas J. 1955. On the numerical integration of d2udx2 + d2udy2 = dudt by implicit methods. J Soc Indus Appl Math. 3(1):42–65.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas J, Gunn JE. 1964. A general formulation of alternating direction methods. Numer Math. 6(1):428–453.
   Google Scholar
• Dzwinel W, Kłusek A, Vasilyev O. 2016. Supermodeling in simulation of melanoma progression. Proc Comput Sci. 80:999–1000.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca I, Morini M, Slastikov V. 2007. Surfactants in foam stability: a phase-field model. Arch Rational Mech Anal. 183(3):411–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried E, Gurtin ME. 1994. Dynamic solid-solid transitions with phase characterized by an order parameter. Phys D: Nonlinear Phenomena. 72(4):287–308.
   Google Scholar
• Gao L, Calo VM. 2014. Fast isogeometric solvers for explicit dynamics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 274:19–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcke H, Nestler B, Stoth B. 1998. On anisotropic order parameter models for multi-phase systems and their sharp interface limits. Phys D: Nonlinear Phenomena. 115(1–2):87–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginzburg VL, Landau LD. 1950. On the theory of superconductivity. Zh Eksp Teor Fiz. 20(1064–1082):35.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez H, Calo VM, Bazilevs Y, Hughes TJ. 2008. Isogeometric analysis of the Cahn-Hilliard phase-field model. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 197(49–50):4333–4352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez H, Hughes TJ. 2011. Provably unconditionally stable, second-order time-accurate, mixed variational methods for phase-field models. Comput Phys. 230(13):5310–5327.
   Google Scholar
• Guillén-González F, Tierra G. 2014. Second order schemes and time-step adaptivity for Allen-Cahn and Cahn-Hilliard models. Comput Math Appl. 68(8):821–846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurtin ME. 1996. Generalized Ginzburg-Landau and Cahn-Hilliard equations based on a microforce balance. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena. 92(3–4):178–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins-Daarud A, Prudhomme S, van der Zee KG, Oden JT. 2013. Bayesian calibration, validation, and uncertainty quantification of diffuse interface models of tumor growth. J Math Biol. 67(6–7):1457–1485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilhorst D, Kampmann J, Nguyen TN, Van Der Zee KG. 2015. Formal asymptotic limit of a diffuse-interface tumor-growth model. Math Models Methods Appl Sci. 25(6):1011–1043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes TJR, Cottrell JA, Bazilevs Y. 2005. Isogeometric analysis: CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 194(39–41):4135–4195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kästner M, Metsch P, De Borst R. 2016. Isogeometric analysis of the Cahn-Hilliard equation: a convergence study. Comput Phys. 305:360–371.
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Dedè L, Evans JA, Borden MJ, Hughes T. 2013. Isogeometric analysis of the advective Cahn-Hilliard equation: spinodal decomposition under shear flow. Comput Phys. 242:321–350.
   Google Scholar
• Łoś M, Kłusek A, Hassaan MA, Pingali K, Dzwinel W, Paszyński M. 2019. Parallel fast isogeometric L2 projection solver with GALOIS system for 3D tumor growth simulations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 343(1):1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Łoś M, Paszyński M, Kłusek A, Dzwinel W. 2017. Application of fast isogeometric L2 projection solver for tumor growth simulations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 316:1257–1269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Łoś M, Woźniak M, Paszyński M, Dalcin L, Calo VM. 2015. Dynamics with matrices possessing Kronecker product structure. Proc Comput Sci. 51:286–295.
   Google Scholar
• Łoś M, Woźniak M, Paszyński M, Lenharth A, Hassaan MA, Pingali K. 2017. Iga-ads: isogeometric analysis fem using ads solver. Comput Phys Commun. 217:99–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowengrub J, Truskinovsky L. 1998. Quasi-incompressible Cahn-Hilliard fluids and topological transitions. Proc R Soc London A: Math Phys Eng Sci. 454:2617–2654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oden JT, Hawkins A, Prudhomme S. 2010. General diffuse-interface theories and an approach to predictive tumor growth modeling. Math Models Methods Appl Sci. 20(03):477–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peaceman DW, Rachford HH. Jr. 1955. The numerical solution of parabolic and elliptic differential equations. J Soc Indus Appl Math. 3(1):28–41.
   Google Scholar
• Pingali K, Nguyen D, Kulkarni M, Burtscher M, Hassaan MA, Kaleem R, Lee TH, Lenharth A, Manevich R, Méndez-Lojo M. 2011. The Tao of parallelism in algorithms. Sigplan Not. 46:12–25. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Waals J. 1894. Thermodynamische Theorie der Kapillarität unter voraussetzung stetiger Dichteänderung. Zeitschrift Für Physikalische Chemie. 13(1):657–725.
   Google Scholar
• van der Zee KG, Oden JT, Prudhomme S, Hawkins-Daarud A. 2011. Goal-oriented error estimation for Cahn-Hilliard models of binary phase transition. Numer Methods Partial Differential Eq. 27(1):160–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vignal P, Collier N, Dalcin L, Brown DL, Calo VM. 2017. An energy-stable time-integrator for phase-field models. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 316:1179–1214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilanova G, Colominas I, Gomez H. 2013. Capillary networks in tumor angiogenesis: from discrete endothelial cells to phase-field averaged descriptions via isogeometric analysis. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 29(10):1015–1037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wcisło R, Dzwinel W, Yuen DA, Dudek AZ. 2009. A 3-D model of tumor progression based on complex automata driven by particle dynamics . J Mol Model. 15(12):1517–1539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells GN, Kuhl E, Garikipati K. 2006. A discontinuous Galerkin method for the Cahn-Hilliard equation. Comput Phys. 218(2):860–877.
   Google Scholar
• Welter M, Rieger H. 2010. Physical determinants of vascular network remodeling during tumor growth. Eur Phys J E. 33(2):149–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu X, van Zwieten GJ, van der Zee K. 2014. Stabilized second-order convex splitting schemes for cahn–hilliard models with application to diffuse-interface tumor-growth models. Int J Numer Meth Biomed Eng. 30(2):180–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar