References
- dos Santos MBF, Meloto G, de O, Bacchi A, CorrerSobrinho L. 2017. Stress distribution in cylindrical and conical implants under rotational micromovement with different boundary conditions and bone properties: 3-D FEA. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 20(8):893–900.
- Linetskiy I, Demenko V, Linetska L, Yefremov O. 2017. Impact of annual bone loss and different bone quality on dental implant success: a finite element study. Comput Biol Med. 91:318–325.
- Oh T-J, Yoon J, Misch CE, Wang H-L. 2002. The causes of early implant bone loss: myth or science? J Periodontol. 73(3):322–333.
- Richards RG. 2002. The effect of surface roughness on fibroblast adhesion in vitro. Injury. 27(Suppl 3):C38–C43.
- Simmons CA, Meguid SA, Pilliar RM. 2001. Differences in osseo integration rate due to implant surface geometry can be explained by local tissue strains. J Orthop Res. 19(2):187–194.
- Suzuki M, Guimaraes MVM, Marin C, Granato R, Gil JN, Coelho PG. 2009. Histomorphometric evaluation of alumina-blasted/acid-etched and thin ion beam-deposited bioceramic surfaces: an experimental study in dogs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 67(3):602–607.