308
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Abstract

Reaching a good agreement between computational hemodynamics results and in vitro data is not enough

, &

References

  • Bergersen AW, Mortensen M, Valen-Sendstad K. 2019. The FDA nozzle benchmark: “In theory there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice there is. Int J Numer Meth Biomed Eng. 35(1):e3150.
  • Chnafa C, Mendez S, Nicoud F. 2014. Imagebased large-eddy-simulation in a realistic left heart. Computer Fluid. 94:173–187.
  • Hariharan P, Giarra M, Reddy V, Day SW, Manning KB, Deutsch S, Stewart SFC, Myers MR, Berman MR, Burgreen GW, et al. 2011. Multilaboratory particle image velocimetry analysis of the FDA benchmark nozzle model to support validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations. J Biomech Eng. 133(4):041002.
  • Méndez Rojano R, Mendez S, Nicoud F. 2018. Introducing the pro-coagulant contact system in the numerical assessment of device-related thrombosis. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 17(3):815–826.
  • Nicoud F, Toda HB, Cabrit O, Bose S, Lee J. 2011. Using singular values to build a subgrid-scale model for large eddy simulations. Phys Fluid. 23(8):085106.
  • Sigüenza J, Mendez S, Ambard D, Dubois F, Jourdan F, Mozul R, Nicoud F. 2016. Validation of an immersed thick boundary method for simulating fluid-structure interactions of deformable membranes. Comput Phys. 322:723–746.
  • Sigüenza J, Pott D, Mendez S, Sonntag S J, Kaufmann TAS, Steinseifer U, Nicoud F. 2018. Fluid-structure interaction of a pulsatile flow with an aortic valve model: a combined experimental and numerical study. Int J Numer Meth Biomed Eng. 34(4):e2945–19.
  • Zmijanovic V, Mendez S, Moureau V, Nicoud F. 2017. About the numerical robustness of biomedical benchmark cases: interlaboratory FDA’s idealized medical device. Int J Numer Meth Biomed Eng. 33(1):e02789.